Image ImageImage Image

Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll

Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet

How much do you think PWill averages over his next deal?

$20M+
1
1%
$15M - $20M
24
30%
$12M - $15M (MLE is $12.3M, QO is $12.9M)
35
44%
Less than $12M
20
25%
 
Total votes: 80

Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 24,988
And1: 7,028
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#161 » by Chi town » Fri Apr 19, 2024 7:24 pm

MrSparkle wrote:The thing about Pat, is he played about 12 good (if we want to call them that.. more like “OK”) games out of 43. I’d consider atleast 10 of those to be deplorable (sub-Snell… better off if he didn’t even shoot the ball). 1-4 record in his 5 “best” games.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/willipa01/gamelog/2024

Coupled with missing half the season for the 2nd time in his short career… he failed to achieve many milestones for a RFA.

Saddiq Bey is probably a dead-on comparison (if not clearly better, so far). We’ll see what either guy makes, having some promise, but also many ups and downs, and season ending injuries.

I’ll be kind of livid if Bulls resign him to $15m or more salary. This should be a Coby deal part 2. $33/3 with no player option… but loaded with lofty incentives (all-star, mip, all-defensive, etc.).


I like Sadiq Bey as a DDR replacement.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 18,630
And1: 13,281
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#162 » by kodo » Fri Apr 19, 2024 8:02 pm

drosestruts wrote:It would be great to get Patrick Williams to re-sign on a value deal.

The way I see it - Lauri broke out in year 6. Coby's having a breakout in year 5. It takes time these days?

From the 2020 NBA Draft - who's even broken out? Anthony Edwards for sure. Tyrese Haliburton for sure. Tyrese Maxey for sure. Desmond Bane.

Haliburton and Bane especially were both older players.

Some will say LaMelo but, does he even play basketball? Poor Ball brothers, they're so good and so much fun to watch.

It's not that I think everyone else is a bust, I think it just takes time these days. Williams was also the youngest player in his draft class. He was always a project to an extent.


I don't see a Coby/Lauri situation. Coby & Lauri showed the talent they had in year 1 & 2. The reason their total #s didn't progress is because in the AK regime opportunities for young talent was de-prioritized over playing vets like Thad Young & Vucevic & Satoransky.

Per 36 minutes
Coby rookie: 18.5 ppg 35% 3P 4 apg
Coby now: 18.9 ppg 37% 3P 5 apg

Lauri year2: 21 ppg 36% 3P 10 rpg
Lauri now: 25 ppg 40% 3P 9 rpg

Patrick has been 12-13 points per 36 for 4 years now, been given every opportunity and start, wasn't buried on the bench by vet PFs (we don't even roster anyone who could possibly compete with him).

Pat's maximized just being a guy standing in the corner and hitting spoon fed shots at excellent efficiency. To break into 22+ ppg he has to do things off the dribble or be constantly moving off-ball like Klay or Herro. He's never shown the DNA of being talented at either.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 23,668
And1: 7,665
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#163 » by sco » Fri Apr 19, 2024 8:14 pm

kodo wrote:
drosestruts wrote:It would be great to get Patrick Williams to re-sign on a value deal.

The way I see it - Lauri broke out in year 6. Coby's having a breakout in year 5. It takes time these days?

From the 2020 NBA Draft - who's even broken out? Anthony Edwards for sure. Tyrese Haliburton for sure. Tyrese Maxey for sure. Desmond Bane.

Haliburton and Bane especially were both older players.

Some will say LaMelo but, does he even play basketball? Poor Ball brothers, they're so good and so much fun to watch.

It's not that I think everyone else is a bust, I think it just takes time these days. Williams was also the youngest player in his draft class. He was always a project to an extent.


I don't see a Coby/Lauri situation. Coby & Lauri showed the talent they had in year 1 & 2. The reason their total #s didn't progress is because in the AK regime opportunities for young talent was de-prioritized over playing vets like Thad Young & Vucevic & Satoransky.

Per 36 minutes
Coby rookie: 18.5 ppg 35% 3P 4 apg
Coby now: 18.9 ppg 37% 3P 5 apg

Lauri year2: 21 ppg 36% 3P 10 rpg
Lauri now: 25 ppg 40% 3P 9 rpg

Patrick has been 12-13 points per 36 for 4 years now, been given every opportunity and start, wasn't buried on the bench by vet PFs (we don't even roster anyone who could possibly compete with him).

Pat's maximized just being a guy standing in the corner and hitting spoon fed shots at excellent efficiency. To break into 22+ ppg he has to do things off the dribble or be constantly moving off-ball like Klay or Herro. He's never shown the DNA of being talented at either.

Yeah good points. He just isn't that sort of guy and he doesn't have the handles or post moves to be guy who creates off the dribble.
:clap:
meekrab
RealGM
Posts: 12,235
And1: 8,961
Joined: Dec 15, 2014

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#164 » by meekrab » Fri Apr 19, 2024 9:14 pm

Chi town wrote:Don’t forget!

https://youtu.be/PUOGCDFA_6g?si=J0klOFyaWb_AXJ1H

I think he resigns a Coby type deal. 3/45.

Man it's frustrating watching a video like that and comparing it to how Pat plays 80% of his games like he's allergic to the basketball.
User avatar
greenl
Starter
Posts: 2,458
And1: 1,520
Joined: Mar 08, 2012

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#165 » by greenl » Sat Apr 20, 2024 2:00 pm

I'd be fine if they moved on from Pat. His presence doesn't have a material impact on the outcome of most games he plays in. He's the archetypal "just a guy".
"Children are smarter than any of us. Know how I know that? I don't know one child with a full time job and children." - Bill Hicks
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,086
And1: 35,332
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#166 » by coldfish » Sat Apr 20, 2024 2:09 pm

greenl wrote:I'd be fine if they moved on from Pat. His presence doesn't have a material impact on the outcome of most games he plays in. He's the archetypal "just a guy".


On one hand, he had a few nice games this year and showed flashes of having more skills than he has shown. OTOH, he has been injured a lot and disappears frequently. He might be a classic case of "fool's gold".

IMO, the Bulls really don't want to give him a contract that isn't movable. I think he is worth a flyer at slightly more than the MLE but no way would I tie up 4/100 with him. If he walks, he walks. The Bulls have a hard cap at the LT barrier. They can't use up significant portions on that for players who aren't contributing if they want to win.
ChettheJet
Head Coach
Posts: 6,659
And1: 1,928
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#167 » by ChettheJet » Sat Apr 20, 2024 2:37 pm

I my eyes, evaluating Patrick comes down to, what could he do if Lavine and DeRozan weren't there dominating the ball? To me the defense that Williams brings is very strong, if you want to look he's ahead or Lavine, DeRozan, Coby and Vucevic, he''s guarding 1-4 and covering up for the short comings of the other 4 most of the time. He's got a bit of size on Caruso and strength even if he's playing the 4.

I think he's best suited for the SF, but that said when he's played and started at the 4, it's still been there with DeRozan making his move to get to his spot for the mid range shot. This means he has to wait in the corner spreading the floor so he doesn't cut to the basket and draw his man closer to the dribbling Demar. The same applies to Lavine, PWill has to stay in the corner to again spread the floor in the event Zach decides to drive to the rim. Those two guys playing the ios game leaves Williams with no choice but to wait and watch. THEN once the shot goes up, who is there to get back on defense? You watch the games how often do you see DeRozan or Lavine , even Vucevic when he's beyond the arc, as the first one back to stop the break? Almost never, that was PWill and now Ayo.

In those rare stretches and games when Williams has been free to play, he's shown what he's capable of doing. It's up to the Bulls if they want to give him the time and room to do it next to Coby and Ayo who have shown what they can do.

We'll debate this until the Bulls stat making moves and maybe after if Patrick is in a different uniform.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 35,866
And1: 28,202
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#168 » by HomoSapien » Sat Apr 20, 2024 8:35 pm

The Bulls need something extremely team friendly or for him to sign the QO. He hasn’t earned anything above that.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 15,222
And1: 7,260
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#169 » by Dan Z » Sun Apr 21, 2024 2:36 am

HomoSapien wrote:The Bulls need something extremely team friendly or for him to sign the QO. He hasn’t earned anything above that.


Are there any teams with cap space who might be interested in signing him? I don't think he's shown enough for a team to bid high on him.

Maybe the Spurs, Pistons or Hornets? I imagine that the Bulls would match any offers, but hopefully they sign him to a good deal.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 15,222
And1: 7,260
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#170 » by Dan Z » Sun Apr 21, 2024 2:39 am

HomoSapien wrote:The Bulls need something extremely team friendly or for him to sign the QO. He hasn’t earned anything above that.


Are there any teams with cap space who might be interested in signing PW? I don't think he's shown enough for a team to bid high on him.

Maybe the Spurs, Pistons or Hornets? I imagine that the Bulls would match any offers, but hopefully they sign him to a good deal.
Muzbar
Starter
Posts: 2,133
And1: 1,422
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#171 » by Muzbar » Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:12 am

Dan Z wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:The Bulls need something extremely team friendly or for him to sign the QO. He hasn’t earned anything above that.


Are there any teams with cap space who might be interested in signing PW? I don't think he's shown enough for a team to bid high on him.

Maybe the Spurs, Pistons or Hornets? I imagine that the Bulls would match any offers, but hopefully they sign him to a good deal.

Pretty sure the Raptors have capspace and they're rebuilding, plus the Pistons have shown interest in the past.

There are plenty of teams with space that are rebuilding that could take a chance on Pat.

But would the Bulls match?
Go Bulls... I guess!? Right!?
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 15,222
And1: 7,260
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#172 » by Dan Z » Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:17 am

Muzbar wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:The Bulls need something extremely team friendly or for him to sign the QO. He hasn’t earned anything above that.


Are there any teams with cap space who might be interested in signing PW? I don't think he's shown enough for a team to bid high on him.

Maybe the Spurs, Pistons or Hornets? I imagine that the Bulls would match any offers, but hopefully they sign him to a good deal.

Pretty sure the Raptors have capspace and they're rebuilding, plus the Pistons have shown interest in the past.

There are plenty of teams with space that are rebuilding that could take a chance on Pat.

But would the Bulls match?


I bet they would match, but a better question is...should they? I mean if the price is too high.
Muzbar
Starter
Posts: 2,133
And1: 1,422
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#173 » by Muzbar » Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:11 am

Dan Z wrote:
Muzbar wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
Are there any teams with cap space who might be interested in signing PW? I don't think he's shown enough for a team to bid high on him.

Maybe the Spurs, Pistons or Hornets? I imagine that the Bulls would match any offers, but hopefully they sign him to a good deal.

Pretty sure the Raptors have capspace and they're rebuilding, plus the Pistons have shown interest in the past.

There are plenty of teams with space that are rebuilding that could take a chance on Pat.

But would the Bulls match?


I bet they would match, but a better question is...should they? I mean if the price is too high.

If it exceeds 20m I don't think they should. Pat doesn't deserve more than what Coby got but I'm not sure if there's like a minimum limit he can be offered being he was a no. 4 pick.

Personally I wouldn't go anymore than 15m and a three year deal.
Go Bulls... I guess!? Right!?
Risk Addict
Analyst
Posts: 3,051
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 19, 2003
Location: Assembly Hall

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#174 » by Risk Addict » Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:45 pm

No motor. No QO. Outplayed by Javonte green. Bye bye.
Almost Retired
Rookie
Posts: 1,135
And1: 595
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#175 » by Almost Retired » Mon Apr 22, 2024 12:28 pm

Another AKME mistake. Move on. Maybe he will realize his potential elsewhere, but here he has been an injury prone sleepwalker. He's no better than he was as a rookie. I don't know if I'd want to keep him at any price. He's put up less than 10 "wow" games in 4 years. For a #4 pick. AKME....just tank already. Then resign. Let's try a different front office.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 23,668
And1: 7,665
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#176 » by sco » Mon Apr 22, 2024 12:42 pm

Almost Retired wrote:Another AKME mistake. Move on. Maybe he will realize his potential elsewhere, but here he has been an injury prone sleepwalker. He's no better than he was as a rookie. I don't know if I'd want to keep him at any price. He's put up less than 10 "wow" games in 4 years. For a #4 pick. AKME....just tank already. Then resign. Let's try a different front office.

I go back and forth on him. I think his performance warrants MLE money, which to me is tied to marginal starting talent-level players. The most any team with an MLE slot can offer is a 4/$55 this season. That sort of deal wouldn't bother me. My premise is that this team, as constructed has basically no assets to build with. I think that contract will keep it's positive trade value. I think next season will be a transition to our "rebuild squad", which, right now consists of Coby, Ayo and Pat.
:clap:
Stratmaster
RealGM
Posts: 20,930
And1: 8,327
Joined: Oct 02, 2010
       

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#177 » by Stratmaster » Tue Apr 23, 2024 1:45 pm

Risk Addict wrote:No motor. No QO. Outplayed by Javonte green. Bye bye.
Amen

Sent from my SM-S911U using RealGM mobile app
GoBlue72391
General Manager
Posts: 9,267
And1: 5,696
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#178 » by GoBlue72391 » Tue Apr 23, 2024 11:21 pm

coldfish wrote:
greenl wrote:I'd be fine if they moved on from Pat. His presence doesn't have a material impact on the outcome of most games he plays in. He's the archetypal "just a guy".


On one hand, he had a few nice games this year and showed flashes of having more skills than he has shown. OTOH, he has been injured a lot and disappears frequently. He might be a classic case of "fool's gold".

IMO, the Bulls really don't want to give him a contract that isn't movable. I think he is worth a flyer at slightly more than the MLE but no way would I tie up 4/100 with him. If he walks, he walks. The Bulls have a hard cap at the LT barrier. They can't use up significant portions on that for players who aren't contributing if they want to win.

Pretty much every player has a few games like that per season and it usually doesn't mean future sustainable play at that level, it's usually just a flash in the pan. 80%+ of Pat's career to this point has been quiet and generally unimpactful.

If it's me I move on, preferably in the form of a trade.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 23,668
And1: 7,665
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#179 » by sco » Wed Apr 24, 2024 1:22 pm

GoBlue72391 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
greenl wrote:I'd be fine if they moved on from Pat. His presence doesn't have a material impact on the outcome of most games he plays in. He's the archetypal "just a guy".


On one hand, he had a few nice games this year and showed flashes of having more skills than he has shown. OTOH, he has been injured a lot and disappears frequently. He might be a classic case of "fool's gold".

IMO, the Bulls really don't want to give him a contract that isn't movable. I think he is worth a flyer at slightly more than the MLE but no way would I tie up 4/100 with him. If he walks, he walks. The Bulls have a hard cap at the LT barrier. They can't use up significant portions on that for players who aren't contributing if they want to win.

Pretty much every player has a few games like that per season and it usually doesn't mean future sustainable play at that level, it's usually just a flash in the pan. 80%+ of Pat's career to this point has been quiet and generally unimpactful.

If it's me I move on, preferably in the form of a trade.

I've been hoping to see more out of Pat for a while but the truth is that he is an above average defender (not elite) and an above average 3pt shooter (on middling volume of open shots). As many have said, he is the sort of guy content to score 10-14ppg and will only take 20 shots a game when forced (and then usually with a lot of TO's mixed in because he is a below-average ball handler). What's that guy worth? Smells to me like MLE type money. I'm happy to keep him slightly above that level to pay for upside that really hasn't shown itself with any consistency (in contrast of other young guys we've had over the years who did go on to become very good).
:clap:
jacoby1us
General Manager
Posts: 8,857
And1: 1,611
Joined: Apr 22, 2003
     

Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll 

Post#180 » by jacoby1us » Wed Apr 24, 2024 3:05 pm

Final and only offer from the Bulls should be $15M for 3 years (Team option on the last year).
#TREADMILLCLUBFAN

Return to Chicago Bulls