Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,311
- And1: 580
- Joined: Jun 24, 2004
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
Boozer
Taj
Gasol
Portis
Niko
Lauri
They're all better PFs than P Will, because they're actually PFs. Don't lower your standards. He's not worth resigning to play the 4. Maybe he's better as a 3, but we'll never find out with Billy as the coach. Even if Pat could stay healthy, I'm just not interested in him being a PF on this team anymore.
Taj
Gasol
Portis
Niko
Lauri
They're all better PFs than P Will, because they're actually PFs. Don't lower your standards. He's not worth resigning to play the 4. Maybe he's better as a 3, but we'll never find out with Billy as the coach. Even if Pat could stay healthy, I'm just not interested in him being a PF on this team anymore.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,312
- And1: 9,163
- Joined: Dec 04, 2001
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
nekorajo wrote:Boozer
Taj
Gasol
Portis
Niko
Lauri
They're all better PFs than P Will, because they're actually PFs. Don't lower your standards. He's not worth resigning to play the 4. Maybe he's better as a 3, but we'll never find out with Billy as the coach. Even if Pat could stay healthy, I'm just not interested in him being a PF on this team anymore.
I basically agree, at least if Vuc remains the C for most of the game. That's why I really want to shake things up BEFORE free agency by making some type of trade probably at draft time involving one or more of Vuc, Caruso, Zach and/or Carter. We really don't have a huge need for any of those guys on their contracts so let's see what we can get. Obviously Caruso is a big plus for us, but with Ayo emerging and even Terry and maybe Patrick able to take a lot of Caruso's defensive role, Caruso would need to be the positive piece outgoing that allows us to move Zach, Vuc or Carter and return some kind of piece at the 4/5 spot that allows Patrick to play more at both forward spots.
Patrick and Vuc at the 4/5 is not going to work.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 24,989
- And1: 13,649
- Joined: Apr 19, 2011
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
nekorajo wrote:Maybe he's better as a 3, but we'll never find out with Billy as the coach.
Who are these true power forwards that Billy benches so that he can stubbornly play Pat at the #4 spot? If a guy is taller than 6' 6", AKME isn't signing him.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
- DASMACKDOWN
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 28,969
- And1: 14,360
- Joined: Nov 01, 2001
- Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
Ice Man wrote:nekorajo wrote:Maybe he's better as a 3, but we'll never find out with Billy as the coach.
Who are these true power forwards that Billy benches so that he can stubbornly play Pat at the #4 spot? If a guy is taller than 6' 6", AKME isn't signing him.
To me this is the one thing that I have never really understood so far in the new regime.
Billy Donovan by all accounts, seems to always shy away from guys with size. When you think about it, when he and AKME inherited the team, we had
7'2 Kornet
7'0 Lauri
6'10 Wendell
6'10 Gafford
6'10 Felicio.
We know that Kornet never really played. Nor Felicio. Gafford had a full residency in the dog house before he got traded.
By the beginning of next season
We were left with
6'11 Marko
6'10 Vooch
6-10 Tony Bradley
The first year Bradley barely played and Marko doesnt even deserve a mention.
Last year
6'11 Marko
6'11 Drummond
6-10 Vooch
6-10 Bradley
Since again Marko and Bradley are complete no ones, its only been Vooch and Drum.
THIS SEASON
6-11 Drum
6-10 Vooch
Didnt even bother to grab a guy over 6'9.
So I am trying to figure out, is it Billy or is it AKME?
Its not AKME's fault Billy wants to play Derrick Jones Jr as a backup 5. Same for Terry Taylor. I just cant figure it out.
The Cult of Personality
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,330
- And1: 2,429
- Joined: May 27, 2003
- Location: Chicago
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
My guess is the Bulls offer something like 4/60-70. Pat rejects and plays on the QO.
My hope is a S&T.
My hope is a S&T.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
- DASMACKDOWN
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 28,969
- And1: 14,360
- Joined: Nov 01, 2001
- Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
jnrjr79 wrote:My guess is the Bulls offer something like 4/60-70. Pat rejects and plays on the QO.
My hope is a S&T.
Seems that is what the Bulls offered before the season 4/64
My guess is they will stick to that.
The Cult of Personality
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,330
- And1: 2,429
- Joined: May 27, 2003
- Location: Chicago
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
DASMACKDOWN wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:My guess is the Bulls offer something like 4/60-70. Pat rejects and plays on the QO.
My hope is a S&T.
Seems that is what the Bulls offered before the season 4/64
My guess is they will stick to that.
Right. Nothing that happened this season would seem to suggest the Bulls should up that offer. KC reported Pat wanted "well into the twenties" per year. So, if a deal is going to be struck, Pat is going to have to move way down and really want the security, I guess. Seems more likely he'd bet on himself if he's healthy going into next season.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,312
- And1: 9,163
- Joined: Dec 04, 2001
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
DASMACKDOWN wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:My guess is the Bulls offer something like 4/60-70. Pat rejects and plays on the QO.
My hope is a S&T.
Seems that is what the Bulls offered before the season 4/64
My guess is they will stick to that.
Sticking to that would be a mistake for the Bulls IMO, because it surely had projected improvement in it for Patrick, and that really hasn't happened.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 35,866
- And1: 28,202
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
KC reported that Pat turned down a 4-year $64m extension earlier before the injury. Given that his qualifying offer is $13 mill, I get why he did but now that offer would look very tempting if I'm him or his reps. He can be set for life and still be 26 years old when he's a free-agent next. If that offer is still on the table, take it and run.
His agent should lobby for it and ask for a series of incentives to increase the value - (i.e. incentives for playing at least 70 games, making the All-Star team, making the All-Defense team, etc.)
His agent should lobby for it and ask for a series of incentives to increase the value - (i.e. incentives for playing at least 70 games, making the All-Star team, making the All-Defense team, etc.)
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- Senior
- Posts: 579
- And1: 184
- Joined: Dec 11, 2012
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
The guy dribbles the paint like he has two left hands, has no post game and dunks like he has toes for fingers rather than the PAW.
Despite the mid3 era blocking his development of possibly becoming a feature guy in the offense, he's never taken the reins to even show glimpses that he could become a feature guy except for a handful of breakout games over 4 years. He's most often timid and appears to really just have a ceiling of an upper tier 3&D guy. Possibly not even a starter, where again, despite 4 years of play he doesn't even have a defined position on the floor. Is he a 3 or a 4? I personally would rather we had tried to develop him as a 3 to play with the Lebrons and Kawhis of the world. Ultimately, I just don't see the light turning on for him. Maybe he goes somewhere like Detroit and can have unlimited freedom to develop his game without the expectation of wins or veteran presences stealing all the shots. Upper tier 3&D is his ceiling I predict. With many more questions than answers from him after 4 years in the league, I suppose $15 mil a year and see if he could be part of a young nucleus post mid3 would be acceptable. Don't see our front office going that path though and fully expect another year of Vuc and Demar and whatever Zach turns into.
Despite the mid3 era blocking his development of possibly becoming a feature guy in the offense, he's never taken the reins to even show glimpses that he could become a feature guy except for a handful of breakout games over 4 years. He's most often timid and appears to really just have a ceiling of an upper tier 3&D guy. Possibly not even a starter, where again, despite 4 years of play he doesn't even have a defined position on the floor. Is he a 3 or a 4? I personally would rather we had tried to develop him as a 3 to play with the Lebrons and Kawhis of the world. Ultimately, I just don't see the light turning on for him. Maybe he goes somewhere like Detroit and can have unlimited freedom to develop his game without the expectation of wins or veteran presences stealing all the shots. Upper tier 3&D is his ceiling I predict. With many more questions than answers from him after 4 years in the league, I suppose $15 mil a year and see if he could be part of a young nucleus post mid3 would be acceptable. Don't see our front office going that path though and fully expect another year of Vuc and Demar and whatever Zach turns into.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,926
- And1: 8,327
- Joined: Oct 02, 2010
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
You don't think Billy is part of that decision? Not that he gets final say on the specific players, but the types of players are absolutely due to Billy's preferences.Ice Man wrote:nekorajo wrote:Maybe he's better as a 3, but we'll never find out with Billy as the coach.
Who are these true power forwards that Billy benches so that he can stubbornly play Pat at the #4 spot? If a guy is taller than 6' 6", AKME isn't signing him.
At least they are if you believe what people say and do. I see a whole lot of "getting into the minds" of players and coaches on RealGM.
As an old man, about the only advice I give to young men is something I learned way too late in life. Believe what people tell you about themselves the first time. Stop trying to read people's minds and rationalize their behavior.
Sent from my SM-S911U using RealGM mobile app
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,668
- And1: 7,665
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
Stratmaster wrote:You don't think Billy is part of that decision? Not that he gets final say on the specific players, but the types of players are absolutely due to Billy's preferences.Ice Man wrote:nekorajo wrote:Maybe he's better as a 3, but we'll never find out with Billy as the coach.
Who are these true power forwards that Billy benches so that he can stubbornly play Pat at the #4 spot? If a guy is taller than 6' 6", AKME isn't signing him.
At least they are if you believe what people say and do. I see a whole lot of "getting into the minds" of players and coaches on RealGM.
As an old man, about the only advice I give to young men is something I learned way too late in life. Believe what people tell you about themselves the first time. Stop trying to read people's minds and rationalize their behavior.
Sent from my SM-S911U using RealGM mobile app
I think Pat is a mid-tier starting forward. He's good at defending and making open 3's, but he lacks the ball handling skills and post moves to be even a 2nd option scorer. I think he is probably more effective as a 3 than a 4, and would be good sandwiched between strong offensive SG and PF.
I'd otherwise be pushing to S&T him away except, from all accounts he's a hard worker, and those guys seem to come back and pleasantly surprise me with their development.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,266
- And1: 5,695
- Joined: Oct 26, 2009
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
DSand wrote:The guy dribbles the paint like he has two left hands, has no post game and dunks like he has toes for fingers rather than the PAW.
Despite the mid3 era blocking his development of possibly becoming a feature guy in the offense, he's never taken the reins to even show glimpses that he could become a feature guy except for a handful of breakout games over 4 years. He's most often timid and appears to really just have a ceiling of an upper tier 3&D guy. Possibly not even a starter, where again, despite 4 years of play he doesn't even have a defined position on the floor. Is he a 3 or a 4? I personally would rather we had tried to develop him as a 3 to play with the Lebrons and Kawhis of the world. Ultimately, I just don't see the light turning on for him. Maybe he goes somewhere like Detroit and can have unlimited freedom to develop his game without the expectation of wins or veteran presences stealing all the shots. Upper tier 3&D is his ceiling I predict. With many more questions than answers from him after 4 years in the league, I suppose $15 mil a year and see if he could be part of a young nucleus post mid3 would be acceptable. Don't see our front office going that path though and fully expect another year of Vuc and Demar and whatever Zach turns into.
His horrible ball handling/shot creation and finishing are the real killers for me in regards to his potential, possibly even more so than his timidness/personality concerns.
How do you expect a guy to become a star player, or even a key piece, if he can't dribble or finish at the rim? It's crazy how far behind he is in those areas for a 4th year NBA player, young or not.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 24,989
- And1: 13,649
- Joined: Apr 19, 2011
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
Stratmaster wrote:You don't think Billy is part of that decision?
Let's put it this way: I've not before heard of blaming the coach for a team having a roster hole.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,375
- And1: 1,373
- Joined: Jun 14, 2016
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
He needs to be traded. Some how.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,926
- And1: 8,327
- Joined: Oct 02, 2010
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
Lol. Ok. Whatever. Then you haven't watched sports.Ice Man wrote:Stratmaster wrote:You don't think Billy is part of that decision?
Let's put it this way: I've not before heard of blaming the coach for a team having a roster hole.
You think the coach has no say in the type of players the front office goes out and gets?
Maybe in the most dysfunctional, horrible management relationships in sports; or for that matter any type of business in the world.
Like I said a long time ago, believe people when they tell you who they are the first time. Billy lives and loves small ball; until, of course, it fails miserably and he starts scurrying to cover his tracks.
Sent from my SM-S911U using RealGM mobile app
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 51
- And1: 7
- Joined: Feb 11, 2024
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
4 years/44m
Flashes don’t mean bugger all it’s all about progress.
Yes he’s playing “out of position” for most of it but not worth a massive contract just because he was pick 4 and “has potential”. Progress hasn’t shown he’s worth big $$
8(TO),10m (TO) 12(TO) 14(PO)
Don’t get me wrong I’d love to see myself proved wrong I just don’t see it right now.
Flashes don’t mean bugger all it’s all about progress.
Yes he’s playing “out of position” for most of it but not worth a massive contract just because he was pick 4 and “has potential”. Progress hasn’t shown he’s worth big $$
8(TO),10m (TO) 12(TO) 14(PO)
Don’t get me wrong I’d love to see myself proved wrong I just don’t see it right now.
2024 draft Bulls select who?
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,488
- And1: 1,497
- Joined: Apr 28, 2017
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
$12-15 is what I want him at, $15-18 is what I think he'll get, $18-22 is what he could get if our FO continues to be dumb as a box of rocks
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
- DuckIII
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,955
- And1: 33,663
- Joined: Nov 25, 2003
- Location: On my high horse.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
Donkedave wrote:4 years/44m
Flashes don’t mean bugger all it’s all about progress.
Yes he’s playing “out of position” for most of it but not worth a massive contract just because he was pick 4 and “has potential”. Progress hasn’t shown he’s worth big $$
8(TO),10m (TO) 12(TO) 14(PO)
Don’t get me wrong I’d love to see myself proved wrong I just don’t see it right now.
That would be amazing but obviously he’ll never lock himself in to 4 years at that amount. Also you can’t have team options year after year like that.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,668
- And1: 7,665
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: Patrick Williams next deal discussion with poll
Donkedave wrote:4 years/44m
Flashes don’t mean bugger all it’s all about progress.
Yes he’s playing “out of position” for most of it but not worth a massive contract just because he was pick 4 and “has potential”. Progress hasn’t shown he’s worth big $$
8(TO),10m (TO) 12(TO) 14(PO)
Don’t get me wrong I’d love to see myself proved wrong I just don’t see it right now.
I think if he takes a deal at anything near the MLE ($13/yr), which is arguably his market worth as a marginal starter, I think it would be something like a 3/$40M with the 3rd yr being a PO.