Image ImageImage Image

Bears 2024 4.0

Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet

User avatar
molepharmer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,517
And1: 1,138
Joined: Feb 27, 2002

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1841 » by molepharmer » Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:01 pm

sco wrote:
fleet wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:^^^ that's an interesting way to decide.






Starting to think they may not move back @ all with statements like this

But I'd love to move down and add Verse + Thomas Jr.

No mention of the TE room in this article :cry:

I'll always love you Brock

I don’t think they are moving back out of the blue chips range, put it that way. If you’re not expecting to be drafting in the top 10 for a long time, take your last swing at the top rated tier

I agree. I'm happy to hear this! It would seem logical to prioritize LT and Edge given the Allen pick-up, but I think the actual excerise will be ranking actual guys and not just the positional needs, and I'm sure Poles is anal enough to mock out trade down scenarios.

About all this tells me is the Bears do have at least one edge, one LT and one WR rated as a blue chip prospects. Gotta figure all three top WRs are blue. Unsure if there'd be more than just Alt(?) as a blue chip LT and have no idea which edge, or how many edges, they consider blue chip. All three edges bring something different, and if they've given Latu a full medical clearance, he could actually be their top pass rushing edge.
TGibson (1/28/17); "..."a 4 or 5 on a scale of 1 to 10 for drama"...What's the worst? "...yelling matches with Thibs, everybody is just going crazy and I'm just sitting there...like, 'Don't call my name please..."
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,664
And1: 32,425
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1842 » by fleet » Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:41 pm

Against Twitter wishes, Caleb decided to keep the pink phone, and go on about his business
Read on Twitter
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 20,961
And1: 3,519
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1843 » by panthermark » Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:42 pm

Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 12,202
And1: 5,885
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1844 » by Dresden » Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:27 pm

https://sports.yahoo.com/heres-one-team-not-bears-213631133.html

"All in all, Poles struck at a time of adversity for Allen and the Chargers. And he won.

"Keenan Allen popped up, which was a really cool opportunity for where we’re headed, which is going to be with a young quarterback," Poles said. "I thought it was an absolute perfect fit. I don’t think there’s a better receiver in the league that can be better for a young quarterback in terms of understanding the NFL, timing, space, reading defenses.

"So I think that’s a great addition. It balances the field with [wide receiver DJ Moore] on the other side, Cole [Kmet] and [Gerald] Everett at tight end, [D'Andre] Swift at running back. We have a lot of really cool things that can get going and allow us to be dynamic and really special."
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 24,963
And1: 7,019
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1845 » by Chi town » Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:46 pm

If we draft Alt what could we get for Braxton Jones?
Jimako10
Analyst
Posts: 3,453
And1: 1,598
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
   

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1846 » by Jimako10 » Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:55 pm

Read on Twitter



Well this probably helps the trade back scenario.
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,725
And1: 1,073
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1847 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:02 pm

[x]
Read on Twitter
?s=20[/x]
User avatar
CjayC
RealGM
Posts: 11,523
And1: 1,142
Joined: Mar 02, 2005
Location: Hoiball
   

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1848 » by CjayC » Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:42 pm

Jimako10 wrote:
Read on Twitter



Well this probably helps the trade back scenario.


Heard it was like a 4.56 which is still really good. The problem is that he doesn't ever run. He has like 260 yards rushing in 6 years of college ball. Maybe some team will think they can unlock it, but right now it's just not a factor of his game
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,664
And1: 32,425
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1849 » by fleet » Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:55 pm

IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:[x]
Read on Twitter
?s=20[/x]


Read on Twitter


With all this, it does not seem like a healthy existence for your quarterback to lead the team with. Constantly being in the eye of a media storm.. He said he doesn’t talk much. That was good.
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 12,202
And1: 5,885
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1850 » by Dresden » Fri Mar 29, 2024 1:13 am

Did anyone hear what Jayden Daniel's time was in the 40?
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 12,151
And1: 8,896
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: appropriately compensated

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1851 » by nomorezorro » Fri Mar 29, 2024 1:19 am

he didn't run. lsu people said he could have run in the 4.3x range for whatever that's worth
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 15,832
And1: 7,511
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1852 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Fri Mar 29, 2024 1:33 am

Jimako10 wrote:
Read on Twitter



Well this probably helps the trade back scenario.


Not sure if it’s the camera angle, but that might be the slowest 4.46 I’ve ever seen.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
General Manager
Posts: 9,479
And1: 7,104
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1853 » by NecessaryEvil » Fri Mar 29, 2024 4:41 am

Read on Twitter


Image
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 24,963
And1: 7,019
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1854 » by Chi town » Fri Mar 29, 2024 4:45 am

NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter


Image



“In fact, as I've written before, I think Williams is one of the best QB prospects of the past 25 years -- and I think he's going to have the greatest rookie season ever by a No. 1 pick at quarterback.“
Jeffster81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,003
And1: 1,763
Joined: May 24, 2007
Location: Bazinga
       

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1855 » by Jeffster81 » Fri Mar 29, 2024 8:04 am

If Dave Kaplan is to be believe, the Bears apparently "loves" Malik Nabors. I would be ok with (outside of the 1 overall pick) sacrificing the rest of this year's draft picks, (9th OA, 3rd round and 4th round) plus Carolina's second in next year's draft to move up to 5 or 6 and draft Nabors.Moore/Allen/Nabors would drive the rest of the NFC North DB's crazy.

That would mean the Bears draft class would be just Caleb Williams and Malik Nabors but I would be more than ok with that. If this happened, the draft would be boring for the Bears fans after the first 30 minutes or so.
CROBulls
Junior
Posts: 271
And1: 157
Joined: Jan 11, 2022

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1856 » by CROBulls » Fri Mar 29, 2024 11:50 am

Jeffster81 wrote:If Dave Kaplan is to be believe, the Bears apparently "loves" Malik Nabors. I would be ok with (outside of the 1 overall pick) sacrificing the rest of this year's draft picks, (9th OA, 3rd round and 4th round) plus Carolina's second in next year's draft to move up to 5 or 6 and draft Nabors.Moore/Allen/Nabors would drive the rest of the NFC North DB's crazy.

That would mean the Bears draft class would be just Caleb Williams and Malik Nabors but I would be more than ok with that. If this happened, the draft would be boring for the Bears fans after the first 30 minutes or so.

Fun becomes in later rounds. And can we nab some gems. We dont have much picks left. It's gonna be fun to speculate who is on our radar left with 3rd and 4th round pick.
JockItch43
Analyst
Posts: 3,434
And1: 363
Joined: Jun 21, 2006

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1857 » by JockItch43 » Fri Mar 29, 2024 12:31 pm

ThisGuyFawkes wrote:If they're going to argue importance, it's probably going to be Edge or LT. Just depends on how they have them ranked individually and who is available at our pick. Ideally I'd like to trade down and draft Latu in the 20's while gaining a 2nd to spend on WR or LT. I also would be enamored with Latu and DT in 2nd round (maybe Maason Smith who NecessaryEvil mentioned earlier). I feel like Caleb has "enough" on the offensive side, but if we can make the d-line elite, then look out. Field possession and defensive turnovers are also super important for a young QB.

I also love a good defense so I'm perhaps a bit biased there. Should be fun to discuss no matter how it shakes out.


I'd love for them to target Latu in a trade down situation, I think he's probably the most complete edge in the draft and expect him to make an impact right away. But I just don't see him fitting the preferred prototype, from a physical trait perspective, that the Bears are looking for at the position (a long, bendy type of athletic freak)
JockItch43
Analyst
Posts: 3,434
And1: 363
Joined: Jun 21, 2006

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1858 » by JockItch43 » Fri Mar 29, 2024 12:59 pm

NecessaryEvil wrote:^^^ that's an interesting way to decide.


“One team is going to talk about, ‘The tackle position is the best to go after’ [or] ‘the wide receiver’s the best’ [or] ‘the defensive end’s the best.’ — and use factual information to kinda spit that out,” Poles said. “And we’ll have a debate in terms of what’s more impactful for our football team, short-term and long-term.”

All three groups will have an argument.


“A lot of guys went back to school this year,” Poles said. “I think you’re going to see a significant drop off. … The way we’re set up in the draft this year actually pairs up really well with how I think it’s going to play out.”


Starting to think they may not move back @ all with statements like this

But I'd love to move down and add Verse + Thomas Jr.

No mention of the TE room in this article :cry:

I'll always love you Brock



I've seen video of Poles bringing up OT multiple times, and just like this quote, it was the first position he brought up when talking about prospects in this class when asked about that 9 pick. Now what his OT board looks like, who knows... but the position is definitely being strongly considered. Considering offensive line scouting is Poles specialty, if he really likes one of these guys, I can absolutely see him going this route. Both Poles and Flus have mentioned how they value getting a blue chip guy there as well. If they trade back, I don't see them going down too far.
JockItch43
Analyst
Posts: 3,434
And1: 363
Joined: Jun 21, 2006

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1859 » by JockItch43 » Fri Mar 29, 2024 1:21 pm

CjayC wrote:
Jimako10 wrote:
Read on Twitter



Well this probably helps the trade back scenario.


Heard it was like a 4.56 which is still really good. The problem is that he doesn't ever run. He has like 260 yards rushing in 6 years of college ball. Maybe some team will think they can unlock it, but right now it's just not a factor of his game


Purely intentional based on his injury history. No coincidence that he's stayed healthy the past few seasons after purposefully changing his style of play. Watch him at. Indiana... he ran then.

If Caleb got hit by a bus tomorrow, I'm trading back both picks and targeting the top WR and Penix. Along with CW, he made some of the most impressive throws I saw in CFB last season. Dude has a bazooka and can make all the tight window, NFL throws. Just need to give him some decent protection.
JockItch43
Analyst
Posts: 3,434
And1: 363
Joined: Jun 21, 2006

Re: Bears 2024 4.0 

Post#1860 » by JockItch43 » Fri Mar 29, 2024 1:25 pm

Jeffster81 wrote:If Dave Kaplan is to be believe, the Bears apparently "loves" Malik Nabors. I would be ok with (outside of the 1 overall pick) sacrificing the rest of this year's draft picks, (9th OA, 3rd round and 4th round) plus Carolina's second in next year's draft to move up to 5 or 6 and draft Nabors.Moore/Allen/Nabors would drive the rest of the NFC North DB's crazy.

That would mean the Bears draft class would be just Caleb Williams and Malik Nabors but I would be more than ok with that. If this happened, the draft would be boring for the Bears fans after the first 30 minutes or so.


Would have been a lot better if we lost just one more game lol.

I already know CW is a big fan of Nabers as well. Wonder if he's lobbied the Bears to try to grab him.

Return to Chicago Bulls