ImageImageImage

Trade Ideas

Moderator: ijspeelman

JujitsuFlip
General Manager
Posts: 8,165
And1: 5,092
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: Trade Ideas 

Post#1701 » by JujitsuFlip » Fri Feb 9, 2024 8:50 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
I want to be clear about what I'm critiquing, I don't believe LeVert over dribbling, driving into a crowded paint, and taking questionable shots every other possession, is better than Garland running the offense. He's still playing as though he should be the primary ball handler when Mitchell sits. He shouldn't be.

This isn't about a ball and player movement offense versus Garland finding the weak spots in the defense (the Cavs would be very foolish to just jettison the latter). LeVert isn't keeping the ball moving.
I don't watch games so hard for me to speak to it BUT i know LeVert's game well enough to know what you're describing. I agree, i would much rather have the ball in Garland's hands than LeVert going iso throwing up contested shots.

That is one downfall of Jb allowing everyone to just play their game, LeVert's game is naturally that. On the 2022 Cavs it's why they acquired him, on the 2023 Cavs it was tolerated bc the Cavs had no one else to play off the bench. With the 2024 Cavs and Jb finally discovering 10 guys he trusts, it is not a trait that is needed any longer and as you alluded to it could actually be to the detriment of the team.


Diversity in attack is good, it makes things much harder on the opposing coach. The last thing we want to do is go back to the days we passed the ball around the perimeter until DG or Don tried to create something. We've finally unlocked the team and it's for the best.

A big game is going to come down to something the other coach wants, like Okoro having to make a big shot, or LeVert finishing a drive. We need to prepare them and then trust them in the moment.
I don't think LeVert impersonating Sexton makes the offense more diverse, i think coaches would gladly allow him to play 1 on 5 but that is just my 2 cents.
User avatar
ijspeelman
Forum Mod - Cavs
Forum Mod - Cavs
Posts: 1,730
And1: 859
Joined: Feb 17, 2022
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Ideas 

Post#1702 » by ijspeelman » Fri Feb 9, 2024 9:37 pm

toooskies wrote:LeVert is the closest thing we have to an average NBA basketball player and is thus useful as a connective tissue and redundancy to so many guys. He'll be a perimeter catch-and-shooter if you need him to be, he can be the initiator and drive/kick guy, he can guard a bunch of spots pretty well.

But he's not THE guy you want to do any of those things primarily. He's an understudy, and occasionally thinks he can be the star.

I put him in a category with Niang where I think we're better without them but for political/cultural reasons they still have their seats at the table.


Just due to utility, I think LeVert is above average and worth keeping around (unless a specific niche can be filled). Obvi agree with his tendency to think he's the star, but I think that is somehow a pro for him as well as a con lol. Teams occasionally guard and collapse on him like he's one too which can create open looks.

Niang feels like a direct Love replacement to me (besides the outlet passes). His shooting woes have hurt his value, but if he can return to above 40% three point shooting I think he's another guy worth keeping around based on just play alone. I'm more iffy on him tho due to his defense.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,599
And1: 32,180
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Trade Ideas 

Post#1703 » by jbk1234 » Fri Feb 9, 2024 9:57 pm

toooskies wrote:LeVert is the closest thing we have to an average NBA basketball player and is thus useful as a connective tissue and redundancy to so many guys. He'll be a perimeter catch-and-shooter if you need him to be, he can be the initiator and drive/kick guy, he can guard a bunch of spots pretty well.

But he's not THE guy you want to do any of those things primarily. He's an understudy, and occasionally thinks he can be the star.

I put him in a category with Niang where I think we're better without them but for political/cultural reasons they still have their seats at the table.


Niang is the closest thing we have to an enforcer, and now that TT is suspended, the only player on the roster who will make the officials ask themselves just how chippy they want play to get. He also makes half as much as LeVert. He's not irreplaceable, but he's not bad value on his deal.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 13,659
And1: 4,392
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: Trade Ideas 

Post#1704 » by JonFromVA » Fri Feb 9, 2024 9:57 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:I don't watch games so hard for me to speak to it BUT i know LeVert's game well enough to know what you're describing. I agree, i would much rather have the ball in Garland's hands than LeVert going iso throwing up contested shots.

That is one downfall of Jb allowing everyone to just play their game, LeVert's game is naturally that. On the 2022 Cavs it's why they acquired him, on the 2023 Cavs it was tolerated bc the Cavs had no one else to play off the bench. With the 2024 Cavs and Jb finally discovering 10 guys he trusts, it is not a trait that is needed any longer and as you alluded to it could actually be to the detriment of the team.


Diversity in attack is good, it makes things much harder on the opposing coach. The last thing we want to do is go back to the days we passed the ball around the perimeter until DG or Don tried to create something. We've finally unlocked the team and it's for the best.

A big game is going to come down to something the other coach wants, like Okoro having to make a big shot, or LeVert finishing a drive. We need to prepare them and then trust them in the moment.


Again, I suspect we're just seeing different things. Diversity of attack is good. Taking what the other team is giving is good. You're third best shot creator forcing the issue at the expense of one of your two best offensive players, is not. LeVert isn't driving into wide open lanes. He's not exploiting the weakest defender on the floor. He is, as you put it, doing his thing regardless.

Garland needs to be able to operate within the offense that was installed when he was injured, and exploit the opposing defense when they leave an opening defending the new offense. That takes time and reps. He's already deferring to Mitchell. He shouldn't get shut out of multiple (bad) possessions in that second unit as well.


Garland is still trying to get his legs back under him and rebuild his strength. The only thing he needs to do, is not get hurt and he's going to be a whole lot more than fine.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 13,659
And1: 4,392
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: Trade Ideas 

Post#1705 » by JonFromVA » Fri Feb 9, 2024 10:29 pm

JujitsuFlip wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:I don't watch games so hard for me to speak to it BUT i know LeVert's game well enough to know what you're describing. I agree, i would much rather have the ball in Garland's hands than LeVert going iso throwing up contested shots.

That is one downfall of Jb allowing everyone to just play their game, LeVert's game is naturally that. On the 2022 Cavs it's why they acquired him, on the 2023 Cavs it was tolerated bc the Cavs had no one else to play off the bench. With the 2024 Cavs and Jb finally discovering 10 guys he trusts, it is not a trait that is needed any longer and as you alluded to it could actually be to the detriment of the team.


Diversity in attack is good, it makes things much harder on the opposing coach. The last thing we want to do is go back to the days we passed the ball around the perimeter until DG or Don tried to create something. We've finally unlocked the team and it's for the best.

A big game is going to come down to something the other coach wants, like Okoro having to make a big shot, or LeVert finishing a drive. We need to prepare them and then trust them in the moment.
I don't think LeVert impersonating Sexton makes the offense more diverse, i think coaches would gladly allow him to play 1 on 5 but that is just my 2 cents.


LeVert doesn't play 1 on 5. Like I mentioned he has a 3:1 A/TO ratio and he's basically 4th behind CPJ, Garland and Mitchell in other assist categories. He doesn't just put his head down and speed towards the basket like Collin, he's very aware of the players around him and especially the bigs.

Tim Hardway Jr, Malik Monk, and Norman Powell are currently the top 3 betting favorites for 6th man of the year apparently. I'd suggest you guys take a look how those guys did against the Cavs recently and how Caris played .vs. their teams.

When you've got a 29 year old vet in his prime who could start on a lot of teams at 3 different positions coming off your bench, it's a pretty big advantage. Even more so in that we don't have to turn to the second unit over to him completely like how some 6th men are used.

I just think some of you guys are too used to hating on certain players, and need to start coming around to how well everyone is playing together right now.
toooskies
Analyst
Posts: 3,647
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
     

Re: Trade Ideas 

Post#1706 » by toooskies » Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:48 am

JonFromVA wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
Diversity in attack is good, it makes things much harder on the opposing coach. The last thing we want to do is go back to the days we passed the ball around the perimeter until DG or Don tried to create something. We've finally unlocked the team and it's for the best.

A big game is going to come down to something the other coach wants, like Okoro having to make a big shot, or LeVert finishing a drive. We need to prepare them and then trust them in the moment.
I don't think LeVert impersonating Sexton makes the offense more diverse, i think coaches would gladly allow him to play 1 on 5 but that is just my 2 cents.


LeVert doesn't play 1 on 5. Like I mentioned he has a 3:1 A/TO ratio and he's basically 4th behind CPJ, Garland and Mitchell in other assist categories. He doesn't just put his head down and speed towards the basket like Collin, he's very aware of the players around him and especially the bigs.

Tim Hardway Jr, Malik Monk, and Norman Powell are currently the top 3 betting favorites for 6th man of the year apparently. I'd suggest you guys take a look how those guys did against the Cavs recently and how Caris played .vs. their teams.

When you've got a 29 year old vet in his prime who could start on a lot of teams at 3 different positions coming off your bench, it's a pretty big advantage. Even more so in that we don't have to turn to the second unit over to him completely like how some 6th men are used.

I just think some of you guys are too used to hating on certain players, and need to start coming around to how well everyone is playing together right now.

I'm not hating as much as I'm clear on who I'd have losing minutes as rotation minutes get harder to come by. Those choices need to be made as Evan and Darius ramp up.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 13,659
And1: 4,392
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: Trade Ideas 

Post#1707 » by JonFromVA » Sun Feb 11, 2024 1:25 pm

toooskies wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:I don't think LeVert impersonating Sexton makes the offense more diverse, i think coaches would gladly allow him to play 1 on 5 but that is just my 2 cents.


LeVert doesn't play 1 on 5. Like I mentioned he has a 3:1 A/TO ratio and he's basically 4th behind CPJ, Garland and Mitchell in other assist categories. He doesn't just put his head down and speed towards the basket like Collin, he's very aware of the players around him and especially the bigs.

Tim Hardway Jr, Malik Monk, and Norman Powell are currently the top 3 betting favorites for 6th man of the year apparently. I'd suggest you guys take a look how those guys did against the Cavs recently and how Caris played .vs. their teams.

When you've got a 29 year old vet in his prime who could start on a lot of teams at 3 different positions coming off your bench, it's a pretty big advantage. Even more so in that we don't have to turn to the second unit over to him completely like how some 6th men are used.

I just think some of you guys are too used to hating on certain players, and need to start coming around to how well everyone is playing together right now.

I'm not hating as much as I'm clear on who I'd have losing minutes as rotation minutes get harder to come by. Those choices need to be made as Evan and Darius ramp up.


JBB needs to actually coach and use his bench strategically. I will be disappointed if the expanded roster is just a tool so he can get away with overplaying his starters in the playoffs.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,599
And1: 32,180
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Trade Ideas 

Post#1708 » by jbk1234 » Sat Mar 30, 2024 3:10 am

I'm begging everyone to go back to page 1 and read our hot takes.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers