ImageImage

Brewers/Mets Series

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,866
And1: 3,078
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#61 » by MVP2110 » Sat Mar 30, 2024 3:01 am

MiltownMadness wrote:That's why I made the post on here, tryna be objective and avoid an echo chamber, I immediately knew it was extremely dirty but Brewers fans would defend it or just ignore it. Like I said we all know what we are saying as Brewer fans if the shoe is on the other foot. Lucky McNeil wasn't injured or this would be a whole different story.


I mean the umps & league clearly don't agree that it was a dirty play considering the play was reviewed and it was determined the play was a legal. I'll give you questionable but by no means would I say it's clearly dirty.
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
MiltownMadness
Starter
Posts: 2,386
And1: 924
Joined: Mar 23, 2010

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#62 » by MiltownMadness » Sat Mar 30, 2024 3:08 am

MVP2110 wrote:
MiltownMadness wrote:That's why I made the post on here, tryna be objective and avoid an echo chamber, I immediately knew it was extremely dirty but Brewers fans would defend it or just ignore it. Like I said we all know what we are saying as Brewer fans if the shoe is on the other foot. Lucky McNeil wasn't injured or this would be a whole different story.


I mean the umps & league clearly don't agree that it was a dirty play considering the play was reviewed and it was determined the play was a legal. I'll give you questionable but by no means would I say it's clearly dirty.

We watch sports, we all know refs reviewing and declaring something means nothing. Just watch from an objective standpoint and be the judge, then the answer becomes clear
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,866
And1: 3,078
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#63 » by MVP2110 » Sat Mar 30, 2024 3:29 am

MiltownMadness wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
MiltownMadness wrote:That's why I made the post on here, tryna be objective and avoid an echo chamber, I immediately knew it was extremely dirty but Brewers fans would defend it or just ignore it. Like I said we all know what we are saying as Brewer fans if the shoe is on the other foot. Lucky McNeil wasn't injured or this would be a whole different story.


I mean the umps & league clearly don't agree that it was a dirty play considering the play was reviewed and it was determined the play was a legal. I'll give you questionable but by no means would I say it's clearly dirty.

We watch sports, we all know refs reviewing and declaring something means nothing. Just watch from an objective standpoint and be the judge, then the answer becomes clear


I mean they wrote a literal rule to take out so called "dirty slides" and this apparently didn't meet that criteria. Even the Mets manager after the game said it was a legal slide
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 30,542
And1: 14,103
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#64 » by humanrefutation » Sat Mar 30, 2024 9:02 am

Putting aside whether that violated the rule itself, it definitely looked bad on the replay. Not sure it was intentional on Hoskins's part as it just looked like an awkward slide from a guy who hasn't had many, if any, opportunities to slide since 2022. But still, I can see why McNeil would take issue with it, though he put himself in that situation by planting in the direct path of Hoskins's slide.
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 6,853
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#65 » by coolhandluke121 » Sat Mar 30, 2024 12:31 pm

Hoskins clearly steered his feet left of the base on purpose so that he could easily slide past the base and into McNeil. His entire body weight went into McNeil's lower leg and it was practically an ankle tackle. Apparently he was close enough to the bag to make it legal by the letter of the law, but it's still an unnecessarily unsafe play and if it's legal, then they need to change the rule. If you're clearly sliding to hit a defender instead of trying to slide into the base, I think that should be a penalty regardless of whether you're "close enough" to the bag to make an insincere argument that it was a natural slide. It reminds me of Marcus Smart running under an offensive player just as he leaps towards the basket and trying to draw a charge. Sure, sometimes it kind of looks like he's almost there in the nick of time, but that just becomes an excuse for what is clearly a reckless play.

However, as with Marcus Smart under-cuts, the issue is with the rule and the way it is officiated, and you can't really get mad at the player for trying to game the rule if it works.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 15,999
And1: 7,277
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#66 » by jakecronus8 » Sat Mar 30, 2024 12:42 pm

Kobe.soft.gif
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 92,949
And1: 45,608
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#67 » by MickeyDavis » Sat Mar 30, 2024 1:36 pm

This is great

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 29,753
And1: 20,758
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#68 » by Matches Malone » Sat Mar 30, 2024 2:05 pm

Read on Twitter
?
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,866
And1: 3,078
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#69 » by MVP2110 » Sat Mar 30, 2024 2:08 pm

Chourio all the way down to the 9 hole is disappointing. But overall that looks like a real nice lineup
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 32,655
And1: 9,942
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#70 » by Turk Nowitzki » Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:20 pm

I wonder if anyone's ever gone from batting leadoff in their debut straight to the bottom of the order the next day?
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 29,753
And1: 20,758
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#71 » by Matches Malone » Sat Mar 30, 2024 5:41 pm

Excited to watch Hall pitch. I think he could be sneaky good for us this year.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 29,753
And1: 20,758
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#72 » by Matches Malone » Sat Mar 30, 2024 5:45 pm

MVP Yeli is back, baby
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 29,753
And1: 20,758
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#73 » by Matches Malone » Sat Mar 30, 2024 5:48 pm

****, yeah Hoskins!
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 15,999
And1: 7,277
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#74 » by jakecronus8 » Sat Mar 30, 2024 5:53 pm

And just like that Hoskins is my favorite brewer in years
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 29,753
And1: 20,758
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#75 » by Matches Malone » Sat Mar 30, 2024 5:53 pm

Turang is so crafty with the glove.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 32,655
And1: 9,942
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#76 » by Turk Nowitzki » Sat Mar 30, 2024 5:57 pm

Hall sitting in low 90's with the fastball? :-?
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 29,753
And1: 20,758
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#77 » by Matches Malone » Sat Mar 30, 2024 5:59 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:Hall sitting in low 90's with the fastball? :-?


I noticed that too. Usually, he's up to 96 minimum.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 29,753
And1: 20,758
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#78 » by Matches Malone » Sat Mar 30, 2024 6:12 pm

Ok, Hall. Time to settle it down now.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 32,655
And1: 9,942
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#79 » by Turk Nowitzki » Sat Mar 30, 2024 6:15 pm

Is this the velo he had on his fastball in the spring too? Maybe I'm just misinformed but seeing 91 on the gun is not what I was expecting.
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 29,753
And1: 20,758
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Brewers/Mets Series 

Post#80 » by Matches Malone » Sat Mar 30, 2024 6:22 pm

HOSKINS!!!!!!!!
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?

Return to Milwaukee Brewers