Offseason thread - Hunter Morris Traded to Pitt
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
-
- Junior
- Posts: 313
- And1: 68
- Joined: Feb 14, 2014
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
They were able to get by with Wang last year for half the year so I think they should be okay with 12 pitchers. I don't feel comfortable with only 4 bench guys when they have Ramirez and Lind constantly needing days off. The same can be said with Braun if his thumb issues persist.
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,930
- And1: 1,061
- Joined: Feb 18, 2005
- Location: WI
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
-MLB Trade RumorsThe Brewers were one of a few teams interested in trading for Dodgers infielder Alex Guerrero, though nobody was interested in paying Guerrero the $14MM he’s owed through 2017, ESPN Los Angeles’ Mark Saxon reports. Some teams were staying away from a trade and instead hoping L.A. would just release the Cuban prospect in the wake of his tough 2014 campaign. A good Spring Training, however, has earned Guerrero a spot on the Opening Day roster and kept him in the Dodgers’ future plans
Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,567
- And1: 4,172
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
Guerrero would be a great pickup. Defense is suspect so that makes me a bit wary but he'd be a perfect platoon-mate at 2B and he could start a fair amount at 3B.
Unfortunately, I saw that he has the option to be a FA next year on his contract if he is traded this year...
Unfortunately, I saw that he has the option to be a FA next year on his contract if he is traded this year...
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 98,718
- And1: 35,082
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
Hunter Morris to Pittsburgh for a PTBNL.
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,930
- And1: 1,061
- Joined: Feb 18, 2005
- Location: WI
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
Morris' stock fell pretty quick. I believe he was a MiLB player of year for Crew system a few years back.
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 110,884
- And1: 26,402
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
Thought it was funny that people ever thought he was our first baseman of the future.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,567
- And1: 4,172
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
trwi7 wrote:Thought it was funny that people ever thought he was our first baseman of the future.
Agreed.
At best he seemed like a .210/.295/.450 type guy in the majors.
Re: Offseason thread - Hunter Morris Traded to Pitt
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,930
- And1: 1,061
- Joined: Feb 18, 2005
- Location: WI
Re: Offseason thread - Hunter Morris Traded to Pitt
If Lind is a 1-2Y guy, do we really have any good 1B prospects? I believe Clark is already 28 years old and doesn't seem like a stud prospect or anything. Lucroy seems like he is most valuable behind the plate but I guess if he starts breaking down, could move him and plug in a new catcher. I know Clint Coulter is a higher prospect and C, although i thought they were tinkering with a position change with him too.
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 98,718
- And1: 35,082
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
Kerb Hohl wrote:trwi7 wrote:Thought it was funny that people ever thought he was our first baseman of the future.
Agreed.
At best he seemed like a .210/.295/.450 type guy in the majors.
He still should have been our everyday regular last year.
ETA: and no, I don't think he would have been good.
Re: Offseason thread - Hunter Morris Traded to Pitt
- wichmae
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,726
- And1: 1,031
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
Re: Offseason thread - Hunter Morris Traded to Pitt
Thunder Muscle wrote:If Lind is a 1-2Y guy, do we really have any good 1B prospects? I believe Clark is already 28 years old and doesn't seem like a stud prospect or anything. Lucroy seems like he is most valuable behind the plate but I guess if he starts breaking down, could move him and plug in a new catcher. I know Clint Coulter is a higher prospect and C, although i thought they were tinkering with a position change with him too.
Coulter has been moved to RF
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,567
- And1: 4,172
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Offseason thread - KRod back, 2 year deal, page 21
ReasonablySober wrote:Kerb Hohl wrote:trwi7 wrote:Thought it was funny that people ever thought he was our first baseman of the future.
Agreed.
At best he seemed like a .210/.295/.450 type guy in the majors.
He still should have been our everyday regular last year.
ETA: and no, I don't think he would have been good.
Even though Reynolds does not have sharp splits, I'd still have played him on that side of the platoon, but yeah, probably couldn't have been worse than Overbay.
Re: Offseason thread - Hunter Morris Traded to Pitt
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,330
- And1: 6,853
- Joined: Sep 23, 2007
Re: Offseason thread - Hunter Morris Traded to Pitt
Thunder Muscle wrote:If Lind is a 1-2Y guy, do we really have any good 1B prospects?
Yeah. Ryan Braun. This idea of his speed and defense being wasted at first is silly. He could still steal bases, and having a little more range at 1b can allow you to shift other infielders ever so slightly and close off more of the space up the middle. And speed isn't as much of an asset in the outfield if you don't always get the right read on the ball coming off the bat. Braun is possibly faster Mike Cameron was when he was a Brewer, but how many fly balls did Cameron catch that Braun would have missed? Methinks a lot.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.