Archx wrote:ozwizard8 wrote:Archx wrote:
So you want to trade Kyrie and get Miles Bridges in as a 2nd guy? While Mavs have 2nd best defense since trade and Luka/Kyrie offense equals Nr1 rated offense along with Celtics when both are on the floor.
The Mavs have scored 121 points per 100 possessions with Doncic and Irving on the floor, about equivalent to Boston's top-ranked offense.
Where did I say I want Miles Bridges? Are you out of mind? Some people were suggesting getting Bridges with trading THJ and a pick. Its not possible for trade asset and salary cap reasons.
Try to answer the entirety of the writing. You always
try to get a sentence out of a whole 4 paragraphs. You are doing this with such dishonesty. Where did I say I want Bridges? Wtf is the reason to put kyrie stats? This is a childish behavior. Shameful.
Only statement I made was I'd prefer Kawhi/PG type of player instead of Kyrie to pair with Luka. So you
if you want to create a 'hot take' argument you can compare whether Kawhi or Kyrie would be better with Luka.
If Mavs at some point, trades Kyrie than they can use some of the contracts for a trade to a SF like Bridges.
What does this even mean then? You say you don't want Bridges and yet you do want him? If they trade Kyrie and use some of those assests on Bridges, it would mean that they indirectly traded out of Kyrie into Bridges. So....yeah.
You're probably the only person on Mavs forums who's trying to trade Kyrie since he got here, your wrote so many **** posts about him that mods had to step in, so normaly anyone would assume you keep trying to do so. I mean you just suggested in your own post, which i quoted, that Mavs could trade Kyrie at some point.
I usually post stats to reaffirm my arguments and since you're one of the most erratic and full of nonsense posters on these Mavs forums, i specifically pointed out that Kyrie and Luka work really good together. But you couldn't figure that out on your own and your argument was "
This is a childish behavior. Shameful." I mean, do you even know what that means? What is your counter argument that they DON'T work well together?
But for the sake of fun... in what way would LAC ever want to trade Kawhi and PG13??? This is not a video game, Mavs don't even have anything to trade for them anyway.
First of all stop treating everyone else like 5 years old. Be an adult and apologise for what you lied for. In the message you've quoted, I did not requested trading for Bridges. This is your evident lie.
You cannot be totally biased, and prejudiced and then blame me. Go read my message before replying. People talk about 'trading for Bridges' for THJ, who is probably a negative asset. see Pacers game... I do not think its possible. So out of 4 paragraphs you're taking one sentence and saying blatant lies about my statement. Go get help. Maybe you can ask chatGPT about what a text tries to say.
Here is the chatgpt answer for you and it only involves my 1 sentence out of 10 sentence answer in a context. Even 1 out of 10 does not show an ask for Bridges for Kyrie BS.
user:
what does this mean?
If Mavs at some point, trades Kyrie than they can use some of the contracts for a trade to a SF like Bridges.
ChatGPT
This statement outlines a hypothetical scenario concerning team management strategies within the NBA, specifically referencing the Dallas Mavericks. It's important to clarify that this is purely speculative and does not imply a recommendation for the Mavericks to proceed with such actions.
1."Mavs" refers to the Dallas Mavericks, a team in the NBA.
"2.Trades Kyrie" alludes to the possibility of the Mavericks considering a trade involving Kyrie Irving, a well-known NBA player recognized for his exceptional scoring and ball-handling. In the realm of NBA transactions, trading a player means sending him to another team in return for different assets such as other players, draft picks, or cash.
3."Use some of the contracts for a trade to a SF like Bridges" suggests that, following a hypothetical trade of Kyrie Irving, the Mavericks might explore using the financial or player assets obtained from such a trade to acquire a small forward (SF), akin to a player of Bridges' caliber—Mikal Bridges being an example, noted for his defensive skills and versatility. The term "contracts" in this context refers to the financial agreements and salary cap implications that teams navigate to make trades viable under the NBA's complex trade and salary cap regulations.
user:
Is this statement recommended to trade Kyrie?
ChatGPT
The statement does not explicitly recommend trading Kyrie Irving. Instead, it presents a hypothetical scenario where if the Dallas Mavericks decide to trade Kyrie Irving, they could leverage the contracts involved in such a trade to acquire a small forward (SF) similar to Bridges. It outlines a possible strategic move without directly advising the Mavericks to proceed with the trade.
So GTFO with your nonsense stats, prejudice and all. Read the discussion and quotations all together.
If some people talk about trading Bridges, I can discuss about this which does not mean I want Bridges for Kyrie.I did not suggest trading Kyrie for Kawhi is feasible. You're still acting with huge dishonesty here. My statement is that Kawhi would be better with Luka than Kyrie.
- not that I like Bridges, I want Bridges for Kyrie deal.
- not that it's easy to trade Kawhi for Kyrie.
+ If you want, you can say Kawhi is a better fit than Kyrie but we cannot afford it, that's fine.
+ You may argue Kyrie is a better fit that's fine too.
Don't act like 5 year old, and stop lying to win a fabricated argument.
