I think musers talked me into this.
POSITIVE
He might not cost that much
He could bat against RHs and LHs.
He would drive up the pitch count with his great eyes for pitches
He gets on base a ton still at 44
He would have led the rangers in HRs
NEGS
He is an a-hole of the highest order and only cares about himself
That whole Steroid thingy
he has missed many games over the past few years
Thoughts?
Would Rangers sign bonds to DH
Moderators: Texas Chuck, HMFFL
Would Rangers sign bonds to DH
- catalyst
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,237
- And1: 41
- Joined: Feb 20, 2003
- Location: here
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 52,226
- And1: 6,100
- Joined: Oct 31, 2004
- Location: Getting hit in the head
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 50,169
- And1: 8,227
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
I doubt Barry steps on the field unless he receives a nice fat check. I don't see him playing for anything under 10 million and that might even be cutting it short.
It would be beneficial to the ownerships pockets to sign Barry Bonds. He's also, if not the best contact hitter, so our offense can still benefit from his services. It's worth signing him to a one year deal.
It would be beneficial to the ownerships pockets to sign Barry Bonds. He's also, if not the best contact hitter, so our offense can still benefit from his services. It's worth signing him to a one year deal.