ImageImageImageImage

Texas tried to get Johan?

Moderators: Texas Chuck, HMFFL

studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

Texas tried to get Johan? 

Post#1 » by studcrackers » Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:40 pm

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/w ... ml?eref=T1

SURPRISE, Ariz. -- Several weeks before Johan Santana went to the Mets, the Texas Rangers came very close to making a blockbuster trade for the superstar pitcher, people familiar with those talks say.

The Rangers kept their intentions and progress remarkably quiet this winter, but sources indicate that they were actually the most aggressive early pursuer of Santana, who they viewed him as a rotation-transforming pitcher. Some are suggesting now that they believe the Rangers would have been willing to pay Santana as much or more than the $137.5 million, six-year contract -- or technically, $124 million, five-year extension -- he got from the Mets.

Indications are that Texas' trade discussions with the Twins progressed to the point where there was either agreement or near agreement on the young players going back to Minnesota. At that point, executives involved in the talks believed that the trade was very likely to be consummated if only Santana gave a more enthusiastic response when Twins higher ups quizzed him about whether he'd accept a trade to the Rangers. However, a diplomatic Santana is believed to have told the Twins only that he'd "consider'' going to Texas, an answer that was seen as less than enthusiastic.

It was shortly after receiving Santana's lukewarm response that the Twins stopped pursuing the trade with Texas. People familiar with the talks say they believe Minnesota wanted to avoid agreeing to a trade proposal that could eventually be rejected by Santana, whose full no-trade clause put the power in his hands. Such a scenario could have hurt their leverage in future trade talks.


I ran across this article a couple days ago and decided to post it, now here's the chance to say how much of an embarrassment this franchise is b/c no player wants to play for us even though we actually tried to get him
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
User avatar
catalyst
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,237
And1: 41
Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Location: here

 

Post#2 » by catalyst » Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:11 pm

Sad to hear. I think he would have come here for more money, say $150. This just shows that we are stuck with hicks for a long time, as the Rangers value is very low right now.
User avatar
Jakespeare
General Manager
Posts: 7,633
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 20, 2008
Location: @808sJake
Contact:

 

Post#3 » by Jakespeare » Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:53 pm

I guess when they traded A-Rod it sent a message around the league. No matter how much money they give you, you're still playing for the Rangers. It's a shame because yall have a great ballpark and piles of money to spend and finally a quality farm system.
User avatar
catalyst
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,237
And1: 41
Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Location: here

 

Post#4 » by catalyst » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:51 pm

But the Rangers had become baltimore. signing big name free agents and finishing in last place.
massey1992
Banned User
Posts: 523
And1: 0
Joined: May 10, 2008

 

Post#5 » by massey1992 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:05 pm

To bad the Rangers didn't get him. They really needed to add a big pitcher to their rotation.

Return to Texas Rangers