2011 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread

Mecca · Post #76 » by **Mecca** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:07 am

I've always been a big fan of Brett's. Lawrie is the real deal. The kid can hit. He also has more power than you'd think.

BTW - His sister is FIRE in ability and looks. Danielle Lawrie is smoking hot, imo. Real pretty girl.

Post #77 » by **Schad** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:20 am

I love that you mentioned her looks in three straight sentences, followed by a picture and a drooling emoticon.

Hoopstarr · Post #78 » by **Hoopstarr** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:33 am

Not seeing it. She is not even softball hot.

DonYon · Post #79 » by **DonYon** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:42 am

normally I am a huge sucker for girls with well defined muscular thighs... but I'm not getting this one. maybe it's the facial expression?

Raptorsrock · Post #80 » by **Raptorsrock** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:07 pm

Hoopstarr wrote:Not seeing it. She is not even softball hot.

yep, pretty weird looking at pictures of her and then trying to reconcile it with that post about her. Its just not lining up.

SharoneWright · Post #81 » by **SharoneWright** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:19 pm

Hoopstarr wrote:Not seeing it. She is not even softball hot.

Dude also thinks Pringles suck, so his opinion lacks a certain credibility...

Post #82 » by **J.Kim** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 7:55 pm

SharoneWright wrote:
Hoopstarr wrote:Not seeing it. She is not even softball hot.

Dude also thinks Pringles suck, so his opinion lacks a certain credibility...

Agreed.

Post #83 » by **LittleOzzy** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:18 pm

I don't see it. I even did a Google search just to see if the above was a bad picture.

She has better pictures out there, but nothing stunning.

She clearly has a good side and a bad side.

Post #84 » by **J.Kim** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:34 pm

Call me sexist or too critical of chubby chicks but I think I prefer girls whose arms aren't the width of two and a half baseball bats strung together.

Hoopstarr · Post #85 » by **Hoopstarr** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:49 pm

Pringles do suck. They're in no man's land between greasy and baked; the texture and crunch are unfulfilling; their shape is inconvenient and they break easily; and most importantly the flavor isn't any good.

Mecca · Post #86 » by **Mecca** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:03 am

Well, I've seen her in person, and she thinned out a lot last year, so some pictures are kinda bad. (The pics posted up top are old I think... team Canada was in 08, right?)

Also, D'Antoni's a good coach? :lol:

Some people haven't been paying close attention to the Knicks I guess!?

Oh.... PRINGLES. LOL You guys got me, ha.

Avenger · Post #87 » by **Avenger** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:16 am

I don't know what idiot knicks fans want D'Antoni to do with a one dimensional roster that can score and do nothing else. What exactly are you guys expecting ?

Mecca · Post #88 » by **Mecca** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:28 am

Avenger wrote:I don't know what idiot knicks fans want D'Antoni to do with a one dimensional roster that can score and do nothing else. What exactly are you guys expecting ?

D'Antoni was having the same problems with Chandler, Gallo, Felton, Randolph, and Mozgov as well.

The guy is a terrible coach. I can go on and on for days, but to point out his biggest weaknesses... He chooses to play Shawne Williams on Dwight Howard... He plays Jeffries over Shelden Williams, etc... Also, he sends young defensive minded players to the doghouse regularly. Also, Melo has more 3's in NY then he did in Denver. 25 games vs. 50 games... I can go on and on. Didn't even get into his defensive philosophy.

Avenger · Post #89 » by **Avenger** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:30 am

xKLNx Phenom wrote:
Avenger wrote:I don't know what idiot knicks fans want D'Antoni to do with a one dimensional roster that can score and do nothing else. What exactly are you guys expecting ?

D'Antoni was having the same problems with Chandler, Gallo, Felton, Randolph, and Mozgov as well.

and that team was supposed to be more defensive oriented ? Blame Walsh for assembling a one dimensional roster both before and after the trade. The Knicks will never amount to anything unless they get a legit center to anchor their horrendous defence and those guys aren't easy to find.

Kaizen · Post #90 » by **Kaizen** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:46 am

What happened to this thread?

Where is the discussion about our prospects?

Randle McMurphy · Post #91 » by **Randle McMurphy** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:48 am

Don't care about a team that's going to lose to the Celtics.

WpgPage · Post #92 » by **WpgPage** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:49 am

It got lost behind Lawrie's sister and Pringles, anyway speaking of Lawrie he had another good day at the plate with but another bad day in the Field with his 4th error in 7 games....... He may be a RF yet, but hopefully its just him getting used to the terrible field conditions in LV.

Mecca · Post #93 » by **Mecca** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:50 am

Avenger wrote:
xKLNx Phenom wrote:
Avenger wrote:I don't know what idiot knicks fans want D'Antoni to do with a one dimensional roster that can score and do nothing else. What exactly are you guys expecting ?

D'Antoni was having the same problems with Chandler, Gallo, Felton, Randolph, and Mozgov as well.

and that team was supposed to be more defensive oriented ? Blame Walsh for assembling a one dimensional roster both before and after the trade. The Knicks will never amount to anything unless they get a legit center to anchor their horrendous defence and those guys aren't easy to find.

You can play defense without a Kendrick Perkins or a Dwight Howard.

Look at the Bulls without Noah..

Mozgov, and Turiaf were decent enough to get the job done to have a decent defensive team. We're awful defensively.

Avenger · Post #94 » by **Avenger** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:56 am

Sorry, yeah, this thread is about Blue Jays prospects, not a team that is gonna get swept in teh playoffs

Kaizen · Post #95 » by **Kaizen** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:59 am

That is bad news about Lawrie. I thought people were saying he was okay in the field during spring training.