The Toronto Blue Jays cannot control what happens when the season starts, but they can hope. R.A. Dickey is 38, and he won the National League Cy Young in 2012, and the Jays are very close to trading for him. If Toronto can agree on a contract extension with the warrior poet of baseball — and the sense is that it won’t be a problem — they will send two of their top three remaining prospects to the New York Mets, swap backup catchers and warm bodies, and hope not to look back. It will be a bold move.
But it will be a reasonable gamble, and that’s what matters. Yes, it will pain general manager Alex Anthopoulos to send catcher Travis d’Arnaud and pitcher Noah Syndergaard — No. 1 and No. 3 in their minor-league system, if you believe Baseball America — for Dickey. The rest of the deal sends backup catcher John Buck and a warm body for Dickey’s personal catcher, Josh Thole, and a different warm body, but the prospects make it go. It will be a steep price, plus the extension. This isn’t a heist. The Mets aren’t the Marlins.
But that is where the Jays are. This is what they are. They are not waiting for players to develop anymore, for the crop to come in. They added US$166-million in contract commitments when they raided Miami for Jose Reyes, Josh Johnson, and Mark Buehrle, and that’s before a Johnson extension is discussed. They threw another US$16-million at Melky Cabrera. Dickey is 38 years old, but he’s great right now. Now, to Toronto, is what matters.
And if it didn’t, then they would be going the other way. They would be trading Jose Bautista (32) or Buehrle (33). They would be restocking the minor leagues, rather than using them as currency. At this point, the Jays are either in or they’re out, and clearly they’re in. D’Arnaud and Syndergaard might be good major leaguers, but it won’t be this year, and it might not be next year. Next year, they don’t help.
Dickey does. The deal hinges on him, obviously, and if his knuckler loses its fairy dust then it’s a bust, and Anthopoulos will get killed for chasing the wrong guy. That’s fine.
But Dickey’s magic seems replicable, which means the rotation could go Dickey, Johnson, Brandon Morrow, Buehrle, and Ricky Romero. Dickey doesn’t throw Tim Wakefield’s 66 mph floater; his knuckler doesn’t bob and float and dance in the traditional way. He throws a fast one and a slow one, and he mixes in fastballs for effect, and his pitches aren’t mere objects of faith, even though he’s a religious man. He threw four wild pitches last year, and his walk rate is low and steady. He appears to have unlocked something, and it’s only gotten better.
Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
Moderator: JaysRule15
Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,553
- And1: 2,652
- Joined: Nov 02, 2006
Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
http://sports.nationalpost.com/2012/12/ ... key-trade/
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,128
- And1: 19,350
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
Komodo wrote:Can someone correct anything that's wrong? I'm trying to keep track of all the players in a word document.
5 Starting Pitchers
1. Dickey
2. Johnson
3. Morrow
4. Buerhle
5. Romero
7 Relief Pitchers
1. Janssen
2. Delabar
3. Lincoln
4. Loup
5. Santos (injury?)
6. Happ (long man)
Oliver (retire?)
6 Infielders
1. Reyes (SS)
2. Lawrie (3B)
3. Encarnacion (DH/1B)
4. Bonifacio (2B/3B/SS/OF)
5. Izturis (2B)
6. Arencibia (C)
------------------------------
Bench. Lind (1B/DH)
Bench. Thole (C)
5 Outfielders
1. Bautista (RF)
2. Cabrera (LF)
3. Rasmus (CF)
4. Davis (OF)
5.
AAA Buffalo Bison Callups
Gose (OF)
Cooper (1B/DH)
Jenkins (SP)
Sierra (OF)
McCoy (INF)
Lineup
1. Reyes (SS)
2. Cabrera (LF)
3. Bautista (RF)
4. Encarnacion (1B)
5. Lawrie (3B)
6. Lind/Davis (DH)
7. Rasmus (CF)
8. Arencibia (C)
9. Izturis (2B)
You forgot Dustin McGowan on the DL.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- Senior
- Posts: 740
- And1: 206
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
****double post****
===========
The Boy wrote:trick wrote:Slavery was also an old-time tradition...
wtf bruh
Derrick Rose wrote:They're saying us and Golden State are the super teams.
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- Senior
- Posts: 740
- And1: 206
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
Randle McMurphy wrote:Komodo wrote:Can someone correct anything that's wrong? I'm trying to keep track of all the players in a word document.
5 Starting Pitchers
1. Dickey
2. Johnson
3. Morrow
4. Buerhle
5. Romero
7 Relief Pitchers
1. Janssen
2. Delabar
3. Lincoln
4. Loup
5. Santos (injury?)
6. Happ (long man)
Oliver (retire?)
6 Infielders
1. Reyes (SS)
2. Lawrie (3B)
3. Encarnacion (DH/1B)
4. Bonifacio (2B/3B/SS/OF)
5. Izturis (2B)
6. Arencibia (C)
------------------------------
Bench. Lind (1B/DH)
Bench. Thole (C)
5 Outfielders
1. Bautista (RF)
2. Cabrera (LF)
3. Rasmus (CF)
4. Davis (OF)
5.
AAA Buffalo Bison Callups
Gose (OF)
Cooper (1B/DH)
Jenkins (SP)
Sierra (OF)
McCoy (INF)
Lineup
1. Reyes (SS)
2. Cabrera (LF)
3. Bautista (RF)
4. Encarnacion (1B)
5. Lawrie (3B)
6. Lind/Davis (DH)
7. Rasmus (CF)
8. Arencibia (C)
9. Izturis (2B)
You forgot Dustin McGowan on the DL.
Rogers in the 'pen.
Hutch and Drabek due back sometime this year.
===========
The Boy wrote:trick wrote:Slavery was also an old-time tradition...
wtf bruh
Derrick Rose wrote:They're saying us and Golden State are the super teams.
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
- J-Roc
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,149
- And1: 7,550
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: Sunnyvale
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
Surprise the Blue Jays in house sports network is pro the trade.
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,540
- And1: 2,203
- Joined: Nov 18, 2010
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
Rosenthal's take:
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/toro ... now-121612
Edit- Just saw it was posted in the other thread, but worth posting again
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/toro ... now-121612
Edit- Just saw it was posted in the other thread, but worth posting again
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,990
- And1: 409
- Joined: Oct 13, 2011
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
Tyrone Slothrop wrote:Rosenthal's take:
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/toro ... now-121612
Edit- Just saw it was posted in the other thread, but worth posting again
"He's athletic"?
Dude looks like Kenny Powers
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 67
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 20, 2012
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
J-Roc wrote:Surprise the Blue Jays in house sports network is pro the trade.
Actually that's also not surprise considering that most media and analysts seem to be calling it at least a fine deal for the Jays.
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
- LittleOzzy
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 35,033
- And1: 4,197
- Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
330 views in just over a 1/2 hour... I think this forum is in for a major increase of members next season.
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 14,939
- And1: 2,757
- Joined: Sep 14, 2005
- Location: Toronto
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
^^ I guess that's good...
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
- zong
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,286
- And1: 101
- Joined: Sep 27, 2007
- Location: Toronto
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
I'm holding my breath on that mystery third player from the Mets we are supposedly going to receive.
Should I be? or will that player not affect anything significant?
Should I be? or will that player not affect anything significant?
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
- LittleOzzy
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 35,033
- And1: 4,197
- Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
spykelee wrote:^^ I guess that's good...
Not necessarily, but it's going to happen either way.
A better team is going to bring over a lot of people from the Raptors forum.
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,540
- And1: 2,203
- Joined: Nov 18, 2010
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
spykelee wrote:^^ I guess that's good...
Judging from the previous thread, I'm going to go with "No"
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 14,939
- And1: 2,757
- Joined: Sep 14, 2005
- Location: Toronto
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
LittleOzzy wrote:spykelee wrote:^^ I guess that's good...
Not necessarily, but it's going to happen either way.
A better team is going to bring over a lot of people from the Raptors forum.
Ugh, don't remind me.
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,806
- And1: 8,574
- Joined: Jan 06, 2009
- Location: Scarborough
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
That article by Ken Rosenthal made me understand this trade a little better. I get the point ppl were saying about gutting the farm system for a 38yr old, but if that's the player you think will take you over the top then I understand and i'm all for it. TDA has had several injuries and its not like JPA is a slouch anyway. The pitcher is like 3yrs away b4 sniffing the majors according to the article meanwhile dickey is cy young winner as of last yr. 200inngs 3yrs straight, that's more than solid. This team prolly has a 3yr window, i'm sure AA can find another out-of-this-world prospect by then.
In Raptor Ball I Trust
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,540
- And1: 2,203
- Joined: Nov 18, 2010
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
zong wrote:I'm holding my breath on that mystery third player from the Mets we are supposedly going to receive.
Should I be? or will that player not affect anything significant?
I'm not familiar with the Mets system beyond their top couple of guys, but I would say best case scenario is a high ceiling player who hasn't played beyond low A or a AAAA starting pitcher who's better than Chad Jenkins and can be insurance in case of injury
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,128
- And1: 19,350
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
Tyrone Slothrop wrote:spykelee wrote:^^ I guess that's good...
Judging from the previous thread, I'm going to go with "No"
Good for the health and strength of the franchise, bad for the level of the discourse around here and other Jays places on the net.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
- Posts: 85,319
- And1: 40,048
- Joined: May 23, 2001
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
DreamTeam09 wrote:That article by Ken Rosenthal made me understand this trade a little better. I get the point ppl were saying about gutting the farm system for a 38yr old, but if that's the player you think will take you over the top then I understand and i'm all for it. TDA has had several injuries and its not like JPA is a slouch anyway. The pitcher is like 3yrs away b4 sniffing the majors according to the article meanwhile dickey is cy young winner as of last yr. 200inngs 3yrs straight, that's more than solid. This team prolly has a 3yr window, i'm sure AA can find another out-of-this-world prospect by then.
The trade can be a poor value trade but still logically be the right thing to do. That's the way I view the deal.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.
April 14th, 2019.
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,540
- And1: 2,203
- Joined: Nov 18, 2010
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,806
- And1: 8,574
- Joined: Jan 06, 2009
- Location: Scarborough
Re: Blue Jays are all in with R.A. Dickey trade
The_Hater wrote:DreamTeam09 wrote:That article by Ken Rosenthal made me understand this trade a little better. I get the point ppl were saying about gutting the farm system for a 38yr old, but if that's the player you think will take you over the top then I understand and i'm all for it. TDA has had several injuries and its not like JPA is a slouch anyway. The pitcher is like 3yrs away b4 sniffing the majors according to the article meanwhile dickey is cy young winner as of last yr. 200inngs 3yrs straight, that's more than solid. This team prolly has a 3yr window, i'm sure AA can find another out-of-this-world prospect by then.
The trade can be a poor value trade but still logically be the right thing to do. That's the way I view the deal.
True, I hear and agree with that statement... Why can't we get a prospect back of some value, are the mets playing hard ball?? The age factor is something AA should be pressing no?
In Raptor Ball I Trust