ImageImageImageImageImage

Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 61,874
And1: 54,472
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1041 » by Raps in 4 » Sun Mar 3, 2024 8:06 pm

Cyrus wrote:
Parataxis wrote:Well, looks like the Jays will be getting an extra draft pick after the 4th round. Giants signing Chappy to a 3/54, with player options each year.


We can't have multiple crappy hitters where there only value is defense, that don't do much other than strikeout or hit hr. We had him, varsho. One is enough


I mean, we replaced Chapman with an even worse version of that player archetype.
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 61,874
And1: 54,472
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1042 » by Raps in 4 » Sun Mar 3, 2024 8:08 pm

Hottie McShotty wrote:
Raptors Realtor wrote:The offense is going to be a big issue again this season... They need to upgrade the offense STAT, can't wait till the deadline... And no I'm not basing this on spring training lol, although it hasn't looked good.


2024 has the potential to be an unmitigated disaster for the Toronto Blue Jays.


As if the last 4 years weren't. This team can end up last in the division and Ed still won't fire his friend.
User avatar
Cyrus
Senior Mod - Raptors
Senior Mod - Raptors
Posts: 34,888
And1: 3,472
Joined: Jun 15, 2001
Location: Is taking his talents to South Beach!

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1043 » by Cyrus » Sun Mar 3, 2024 8:16 pm

Raps in 4 wrote:
Cyrus wrote:
Parataxis wrote:Well, looks like the Jays will be getting an extra draft pick after the 4th round. Giants signing Chappy to a 3/54, with player options each year.


We can't have multiple crappy hitters where there only value is defense, that don't do much other than strikeout or hit hr. We had him, varsho. One is enough


I mean, we replaced Chapman with an even worse version of that player archetype.



Agreed but atleast we aren't paying that dude 20+ mil for that kind of production player.

If chappie was willing to take 8 or 10 mil, sure I guess.

It's one of reasons that makes varsho tolerable, if he was getting paid 15 to 18 mill, he would make him even more infuriating
Raptors Realtor
Analyst
Posts: 3,007
And1: 2,854
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1044 » by Raptors Realtor » Sun Mar 3, 2024 10:05 pm

Cyrus wrote:
Raps in 4 wrote:
Cyrus wrote:
We can't have multiple crappy hitters where there only value is defense, that don't do much other than strikeout or hit hr. We had him, varsho. One is enough


I mean, we replaced Chapman with an even worse version of that player archetype.



Agreed but atleast we aren't paying that dude 20+ mil for that kind of production player.

If chappie was willing to take 8 or 10 mil, sure I guess.

It's one of reasons that makes varsho tolerable, if he was getting paid 15 to 18 mill, he would make him even more infuriating


It's what makes the Kiermaier re-signing that much more confusing. I like Kiermaier, but him and Varsho in the outfield doesn't make offensive sense at all. Varsho's value is increased if he's the CF, Springer in right and a reliable RBI producing guy in LF.
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 61,874
And1: 54,472
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1045 » by Raps in 4 » Sun Mar 3, 2024 10:08 pm

Raptors Realtor wrote:
Cyrus wrote:
Raps in 4 wrote:
I mean, we replaced Chapman with an even worse version of that player archetype.



Agreed but atleast we aren't paying that dude 20+ mil for that kind of production player.

If chappie was willing to take 8 or 10 mil, sure I guess.

It's one of reasons that makes varsho tolerable, if he was getting paid 15 to 18 mill, he would make him even more infuriating


It's what makes the Kiermaier re-signing that much more confusing. I like Kiermaier, but him and Varsho in the outfield doesn't make offensive sense at all. Varsho's value is increased if he's the CF, Springer in right and a reliable RBI producing guy in LF.


We're going for the single season LOB record this year.
User avatar
Hero_Panda
Veteran
Posts: 2,520
And1: 3,994
Joined: Oct 15, 2015
Location: SHINE ON!
   

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1046 » by Hero_Panda » Mon Mar 4, 2024 5:02 am

Wrong thread.
"My life has been full of terrible misfortunes most of which never happened."-Montaigne
"at the Fed level, I'm a libertarian; state level, Republican; local level, Democrat; family and friends level, a socialist."-G & V Graham
Mehar
Analyst
Posts: 3,655
And1: 2,237
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1047 » by Mehar » Mon Mar 4, 2024 5:41 am

Raptors Realtor wrote:
Cyrus wrote:
Raps in 4 wrote:
I mean, we replaced Chapman with an even worse version of that player archetype.



Agreed but atleast we aren't paying that dude 20+ mil for that kind of production player.

If chappie was willing to take 8 or 10 mil, sure I guess.

It's one of reasons that makes varsho tolerable, if he was getting paid 15 to 18 mill, he would make him even more infuriating


It's what makes the Kiermaier re-signing that much more confusing. I like Kiermaier, but him and Varsho in the outfield doesn't make offensive sense at all. Varsho's value is increased if he's the CF, Springer in right and a reliable RBI producing guy in LF.

I preferred Varsho in CF. I had mentioned early in the off-season that I would have targetted a guy like Gurriel Jr to play in LF, and move on from Kiermaier. Gurriel can opt out after two years with Arizona, getting 10 million in 2024 (same money as Kiermaier this season), and 14 million in 2025. I thought that was a very reasonable deal which the Jays could have been on. Gurriel's deal with Arizona was 42 million guaranteed over 3 years if he did not opt-out after year 2, which again was reasonable. Hopefully Kiermaier can duplicate his batting numbers from 2023, and Varsho at least can be a league average with the bat in 2024. With the elite defense they provide, you can at least live with that in the bottom of the order if Kirk/Guerrero can bounce back with better years.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 40,580
And1: 13,500
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1048 » by dagger » Mon Mar 4, 2024 3:30 pm

I don't understand the approach management has taken, but I am not privy to the budget they are really working with. It does appear that they won't be a tax team this year. And they have preserved the flexibility to extend Bo and/orVlad without becoming a tax team. But aside from that, it doesn't compute.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
Ranger One
Analyst
Posts: 3,404
And1: 3,404
Joined: Apr 19, 2019
 

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1049 » by Ranger One » Mon Mar 4, 2024 5:33 pm

Why did we even resign KK? I'm so confused by that move. Wasn't he whining about playing on turf pretty much all of last year? And we were supposed to improve Varahos value by having him play his best defensive position at Center. So what the hell happened?
"We are Rangers.
We walk in the dark places no others will enter.
We stand on the bridge, and no one may pass.
We live for the One, we die for the One."
User avatar
Lateral Quicks
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 16,415
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
   

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1050 » by Lateral Quicks » Tue Mar 5, 2024 1:56 am

dagger wrote:But aside from that, it doesn't compute.


It may not compete, either. Barring major internal improvements offensively - and with Guillermo still amazingly in place at hitting coach, that's highly unlikely - this team is not a contender.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
User avatar
bluerap23
Head Coach
Posts: 6,402
And1: 6,577
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
   

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1051 » by bluerap23 » Tue Mar 5, 2024 2:15 pm

dagger wrote:I don't understand the approach management has taken, but I am not privy to the budget they are really working with. It does appear that they won't be a tax team this year. And they have preserved the flexibility to extend Bo and/orVlad without becoming a tax team. But aside from that, it doesn't compute.


They are currently well into the CBT (payroll is at 250m for CBT purposes). They are spending 230million on the 40man this year. 5th highest payroll in MLB. Our payroll is almost double Baltimore and Tampa COMBINED. They can't cry poor. It is mismanagement - plain and simple.
Image
User avatar
Ranger One
Analyst
Posts: 3,404
And1: 3,404
Joined: Apr 19, 2019
 

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1052 » by Ranger One » Wed Mar 6, 2024 6:37 pm

bluerap23 wrote:
dagger wrote:I don't understand the approach management has taken, but I am not privy to the budget they are really working with. It does appear that they won't be a tax team this year. And they have preserved the flexibility to extend Bo and/orVlad without becoming a tax team. But aside from that, it doesn't compute.


They are currently well into the CBT (payroll is at 250m for CBT purposes). They are spending 230million on the 40man this year. 5th highest payroll in MLB. Our payroll is almost double Baltimore and Tampa COMBINED. They can't cry poor. It is mismanagement - plain and simple.


Wait.. Baltimore is gonna run away with the division with only a 60 million dollar payroll?? You wot mate?
"We are Rangers.
We walk in the dark places no others will enter.
We stand on the bridge, and no one may pass.
We live for the One, we die for the One."
bartron_44
Freshman
Posts: 70
And1: 48
Joined: Oct 30, 2018
     

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1053 » by bartron_44 » Wed Mar 6, 2024 7:27 pm

Yeah, why bring back the reigning AL GG winner ( his 4th) who posted an OPS of .741 last year. He looked like the KK before the injuries again, and they got him for 10.5 million.

Guys like Eden, Roden and Barger should all start in AAA again, so its not like he’s blocking a top prospect on a 1 year deal.

He gives them the best defensive OF in the big leagues. When you are trying to win with pitching and defense, that’s a pretty big deal. Also, not a bad guy to learn how to play CF in the AL from if your Varsho.
bartron_44
Freshman
Posts: 70
And1: 48
Joined: Oct 30, 2018
     

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1054 » by bartron_44 » Wed Mar 6, 2024 7:58 pm

Also, they cant be surprised how bad the hitting got. They basically spent 2 off seasons letting HRs walk out the door in favor of pitching and defense.

Semien, Hernandez, Grichuk and Gurriel are all gone. Those 4 guys hit 120 HRs with 383 RBIs in 2021 when they could out-slug people.

They replaced Ray, Stripling, Ryu and Matz with Gausman, Bassitt, Manoah and Kikuchi… and then let Ryu walk. Thanks to Manoa’s implosion, they really didnt get much better SP in 2023 then they did in 2021. They NEED Manoah to figure it out this year, or for Bowden Francis to have a breakout season in the 5 spot. They also need a DOMINANT bullpen behind these starters they are going to be relying so heavily upon, and they didnt really spend any money there this offseason with Rodriguez trying things as a starter ffs. They lost Hicks and Jackson and added essentially no one.

Getting real hard to not think Atkins needs to go.
Asianiac_24
General Manager
Posts: 8,149
And1: 3,598
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Contact:
   

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1055 » by Asianiac_24 » Thu Mar 7, 2024 2:33 am

bartron_44 wrote:Also, they cant be surprised how bad the hitting got. They basically spent 2 off seasons letting HRs walk out the door in favor of pitching and defense.

Semien, Hernandez, Grichuk and Gurriel are all gone. Those 4 guys hit 120 HRs with 383 RBIs in 2021 when they could out-slug people.

They replaced Ray, Stripling, Ryu and Matz with Gausman, Bassitt, Manoah and Kikuchi… and then let Ryu walk. Thanks to Manoa’s implosion, they really didnt get much better SP in 2023 then they did in 2021. They NEED Manoah to figure it out this year, or for Bowden Francis to have a breakout season in the 5 spot. They also need a DOMINANT bullpen behind these starters they are going to be relying so heavily upon, and they didnt really spend any money there this offseason with Rodriguez trying things as a starter ffs. They lost Hicks and Jackson and added essentially no one.

Getting real hard to not think Atkins needs to go.


Not only that, we got basically nothing in return for them as well. Semien just walked, Hernandez was traded for a BP pitcher, and Gurriel was a free throw in. Grichuk sucks anyways
User avatar
youreachiteach
Veteran
Posts: 2,842
And1: 582
Joined: Jul 06, 2004
Location: Brunei, Darrussalam

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1056 » by youreachiteach » Thu Mar 7, 2024 4:48 am

Althugh they are willing to spend on top flight talent, they are very frugal in their middle tier selection of players, preferring to keep the powder dry for the trade deadline. Remember when Anthopolis had to pass around the hat to try to sign a pitcher before spring training? Their money is very transitory and is really only available for whatever targets they've pre-determined. If they don't fall into the perfect hole (or they're ridiculously cheap--like our new is old CFer) they don't sign them. Unless there is term, they rarely trade for them, which ends up costing them significant talent to balance out the roster. It's part of having a publically traded company as an owner.

I do think they do a good job signing young players and trying to improve their internal development system, but mostly they are playing the small-mid market game with more "play around" money (mostly at the deadline). Which makes sense, given their tme in Cleveland.
Image
User avatar
bluerap23
Head Coach
Posts: 6,402
And1: 6,577
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
   

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1057 » by bluerap23 » Thu Mar 7, 2024 2:14 pm

youreachiteach wrote:Althugh they are willing to spend on top flight talent, they are very frugal in their middle tier selection of players, preferring to keep the powder dry for the trade deadline. Remember when Anthopolis had to pass around the hat to try to sign a pitcher before spring training? Their money is very transitory and is really only available for whatever targets they've pre-determined. If they don't fall into the perfect hole (or they're ridiculously cheap--like our new is old CFer) they don't sign them. Unless there is term, they rarely trade for them, which ends up costing them significant talent to balance out the roster. It's part of having a publically traded company as an owner.

I do think they do a good job signing young players and trying to improve their internal development system, but mostly they are playing the small-mid market game with more "play around" money (mostly at the deadline). Which makes sense, given their tme in Cleveland.


Again - can't blame ownership when you have a 230million budget. This is on Shatkins. Almost a decade in and they can't figure out a way to put a winner on the field. This team has had some really amazing management in its history. I'd rank these guys second worst. Hoping there are no extensions as they are nearing the end of their contracts.
Image
User avatar
Ranger One
Analyst
Posts: 3,404
And1: 3,404
Joined: Apr 19, 2019
 

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1058 » by Ranger One » Thu Mar 7, 2024 6:48 pm

bluerap23 wrote:
youreachiteach wrote:Althugh they are willing to spend on top flight talent, they are very frugal in their middle tier selection of players, preferring to keep the powder dry for the trade deadline. Remember when Anthopolis had to pass around the hat to try to sign a pitcher before spring training? Their money is very transitory and is really only available for whatever targets they've pre-determined. If they don't fall into the perfect hole (or they're ridiculously cheap--like our new is old CFer) they don't sign them. Unless there is term, they rarely trade for them, which ends up costing them significant talent to balance out the roster. It's part of having a publically traded company as an owner.

I do think they do a good job signing young players and trying to improve their internal development system, but mostly they are playing the small-mid market game with more "play around" money (mostly at the deadline). Which makes sense, given their tme in Cleveland.


Again - can't blame ownership when you have a 230million budget. This is on Shatkins. Almost a decade in and they can't figure out a way to put a winner on the field. This team has had some really amazing management in its history. I'd rank these guys second worst. Hoping there are no extensions as they are nearing the end of their contracts.



What I find baffling is for the first time in a decade Rogers is finally willing to dish out the big bucks to put a winning product on the field and then decides to bring in the biggest penny pinchers in the league to run his team.
"We are Rangers.
We walk in the dark places no others will enter.
We stand on the bridge, and no one may pass.
We live for the One, we die for the One."
User avatar
youreachiteach
Veteran
Posts: 2,842
And1: 582
Joined: Jul 06, 2004
Location: Brunei, Darrussalam

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1059 » by youreachiteach » Thu Mar 7, 2024 9:23 pm

bluerap23 wrote:
youreachiteach wrote:Althugh they are willing to spend on top flight talent, they are very frugal in their middle tier selection of players, preferring to keep the powder dry for the trade deadline. Remember when Anthopolis had to pass around the hat to try to sign a pitcher before spring training? Their money is very transitory and is really only available for whatever targets they've pre-determined. If they don't fall into the perfect hole (or they're ridiculously cheap--like our new is old CFer) they don't sign them. Unless there is term, they rarely trade for them, which ends up costing them significant talent to balance out the roster. It's part of having a publically traded company as an owner.

I do think they do a good job signing young players and trying to improve their internal development system, but mostly they are playing the small-mid market game with more "play around" money (mostly at the deadline). Which makes sense, given their tme in Cleveland.


Again - can't blame ownership when you have a 230million budget. This is on Shatkins. Almost a decade in and they can't figure out a way to put a winner on the field. This team has had some really amazing management in its history. I'd rank these guys second worst. Hoping there are no extensions as they are nearing the end of their contracts.


Oh I agree. I don't think it is an appropriate model. I just think this is why they were hired (to run it this way).
Image
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 40,580
And1: 13,500
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#1060 » by dagger » Thu Mar 7, 2024 9:43 pm

Read on Twitter
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER

Return to Toronto Blue Jays