i don't know....according to that when you juxtapose SG and PG for AI he gets just about the same point production, just by being the assist man instead....
2.4 more assists....4.8 points and more passing...only a 2 point diff. between scoring by pos.
thats his individual stats though, which aren't that relevant.
noone's talking about how the entire team does offensively when iverson's at the point vs. at the sg position. 82games doesn't record that.
the closest thing you could do is look at anthony carter's oncourt/offcourt stats, because he's the guy that plays point alongside iverson for 90% of his minutes. and the offensive production certainly takes a dip with AC on the court. but that's sketchy, because carter also plays some minutes without iverson...and you can see through iversons oncourt/offcourt numbers that the offense dies when he goes out.
the other thing you can do is look at 5 man units with iverson:
http://www.82games.com/0708/07DEN3B.HTM
it doesn't give you point per 100 possession offensive stuff....but it does give you +/-
what's interesting is that the iverson/khouba/melo/martin/camby combination has a way higher +/- (positive, at least), than carter/iverson/melo/martin/camby. and they've played essentially the same minutes.
unfortunately our offense sucks with khouba on the court...so i'm not sure that's an effective longterm solution. (even though our defense is deadly with khouba in the game)
also those stats may be misleading, because our schedule was super easy to start the year....and that's when that lineup was successful.
edit: i didn't see this before....
but in that 5 man unit page, the team's eFG% goes up 2% with iverson/diawara as opposed to carter/iverson.
and the eFGA (efg against) goes down over 8%
