111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS

Moderator: TyCobb

Was this loss for the 2022 Dodgers as disappointing as the 2007 Patriots and 2016 Warriors?

Yes
27
34%
No
52
66%
 
Total votes: 79

Cubbies2120
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,747
And1: 8,242
Joined: Apr 20, 2012
Location: MD
 

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#41 » by Cubbies2120 » Sun Oct 16, 2022 5:55 pm

dockingsched wrote:
ClipsFanAgain wrote:Go Padres!!! Sick of the Dodgers fans booing the Clippers players at games, so **** em all.


It’s not just dodgers fans my friend, they got booed at the LA Coliseum and SoFi at a Rams games too. What you’re sick of is “los Angeles fans” :lol:


For an organization who hasn't had much success in the NBA, it's crazy how rent free Clippers live in "Los Angeles fans" heads :lol:

They're trying to enjoy a sporting event and getting booed :lol: So much for "Nobody cares about the Clippers in LA", they care enough to emotionally respond to player sightings...
formula 400
Pro Prospect
Posts: 943
And1: 621
Joined: Sep 28, 2021
Location: Chi
   

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#42 » by formula 400 » Sun Oct 16, 2022 6:02 pm

ClipsFanAgain wrote:Go Padres!!! Sick of the Dodgers fans booing the Clippers players at games, so **** em all.



LOL clips have no love in Los Angeles
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 22,285
And1: 26,553
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#43 » by azcatz11 » Sun Oct 16, 2022 6:05 pm

Is it a fair statement that if the Clips win a championship this year the split will be 50/50 between laker and clipper fans?
TheLand13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,289
And1: 4,533
Joined: Aug 31, 2021
     

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#44 » by TheLand13 » Sun Oct 16, 2022 6:41 pm

In baseball, the best team frequently loses more. It can be for a variety of reasons, but either way, the playoffs are usually a blood bath and sometimes a team can be riding high on an insane amount of momentum, can get hot at the right time or can just matchup better. The Dodgers are actually not the only team the Padres upset in this postseason. Before them came the Mets, who were also an elite team and also won 100 games, and the Dodgers took them out in the opening playoff round.

Hell, the Guardians are one game away from upsetting the Yankees as well. I can't speak on the other two series that I just mentioned, but I can tell you why this one might go the Guardians way: matchups.

In this case, the Yankees powerhouse hitting is struggling to do enough against the Guardians elite pitching to secure victories. Last night was the best offensive outing they've had all series, but the problem is that the Yankees pitching outside a select few players isn't nearly as strong. And thus, they struggled to keep the Guardians bats from eating them up alive (there's also this guy named Oscar Gonzalez who can't seem to do any wrong right now).

Speaking of, why the hell was my thread about Oscar moved to the baseball section but this one wasn't?
User avatar
OkcSinceSGA
RealGM
Posts: 28,383
And1: 29,619
Joined: Sep 19, 2015
 

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#45 » by OkcSinceSGA » Sun Oct 16, 2022 6:43 pm

azcatz11 wrote:Is it a fair statement that if the Clips win a championship this year the split will be 50/50 between laker and clipper fans?


No. But over 20 years probably. With continued winning, new arena, way more community involvement, less Jerry Springer antics than Lakers.
“This kid reminds me of a 6-6 Chris Paul. He wants to win everything.”

Olin Simplis- SGA’s trainer.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,464
And1: 6,299
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#46 » by nickhx2 » Sun Oct 16, 2022 7:14 pm

kinda pleased to see a lot of really intelligent takes on the variance of baseball and also how the structure leads itself to things like these. to me, baseball's an idiotic sport for many reasons, and a format that only lends itself to increasing the variance of playoff results is one of them.

think a lot of posters already nailed it, but fwiw there was a great article on espn a few years ago that dove into this, and if i remember correctly the number of games teams should be playing was well beyond these stupid bo3's and bo5's. like, honestly: once i saw it was 1-1 i pretty much instantly thought you might as well flip a coin, because there aren't enough games to have a team realize its best self going against the best version of the other team, the way you would see in the NBA playoffs.

and to respond to the odd, misplaced tangent: also not surprised to see a lot of unintelligent takes regarding the clips: like you guys seriously don't see the clown shoes you're wearing when you just keep braying "nOboDy WaTns tHm iN lA!`1!" ?
heezyo2o
Starter
Posts: 2,276
And1: 1,258
Joined: Oct 16, 2004

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#47 » by heezyo2o » Sun Oct 16, 2022 7:54 pm

Best of 5 doesn't always lead to the best team winning. Bob Costas described it nice and simple before: their ace can pitch a great game and get a win, the bats can go cold in a game/2nd loss, 3rd game can go down to a bad bounce in a close game. Not being a homer, dodgers just lost, but they were still the "best team."

There's talk about the dodger payroll. These ridiculous 10 year contracts in baseball aren't cheap. Both the phillies and padres are top 5 in payroll. Mets were #1. Yankees always near the top. Yeah there's cleveland, but for the most part you need to spend money to win. Lots of teams spend over 200 million every season and get no where
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 13,472
And1: 10,296
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#48 » by Cavsfansince84 » Sun Oct 16, 2022 8:44 pm

No and if there was going to be a baseball equivalent it would be the Mariners from about 10-12 years ago who actually set the wins record(117 I think). Even so, upsets happen much more easily in baseball.
Roscoe Sheed
RealGM
Posts: 10,635
And1: 4,419
Joined: May 01, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#49 » by Roscoe Sheed » Sun Oct 16, 2022 8:56 pm

Cavsfansince84 wrote:No and if there was going to be a baseball equivalent it would be the Mariners from about 10-12 years ago who actually set the wins record(117 I think). Even so, upsets happen much more easily in baseball.

I think that was way back in 2001 and they ended up losing to the Yankees
User avatar
SalmonsSuperfan
Starter
Posts: 2,206
And1: 2,142
Joined: Feb 14, 2019
 

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#50 » by SalmonsSuperfan » Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:09 pm

they probably would've won a 7 game series. padres, phillies, indians are just hot at the right time. for san diego, hader and soto were blockbuster deadline trades (juan soto being almost certainly the biggest trade in mlb history) and sucked for most of the second half but showed out in a big way vs LA.
User avatar
SalmonsSuperfan
Starter
Posts: 2,206
And1: 2,142
Joined: Feb 14, 2019
 

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#51 » by SalmonsSuperfan » Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:12 pm

if san diego can afford to keep tatis, machado, soto, hader and their starting pitchers (unlikely) they're probably the best team in the NL for years to come.
User avatar
Lalouie
RealGM
Posts: 19,449
And1: 10,069
Joined: May 12, 2017

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#52 » by Lalouie » Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:22 pm

Lucky Clover wrote:Firstly, my condolences Dodgers fans.

Secondly - question I had for sports fans - Is this just as bad as the 73-9 Warriors and 18-0 Patriots losing in the postseason? I know it's not quite the same since the Dodgers didn't make it to the championship round but they had an all-time great roster, were the clear favorite to win it all, and Dave Roberts went as far as to guarantee a title back in March. This just seems like such an astronomical defeat and upset and it came at the hands of their division rival who they had beaten 16 times this year. One post season win to show for this payroll.


NOT CLOSE

this is the way baseball is.
what is a "dynasty" in baseball. well in baseball you have to go back to the 20s and 30s with the yankees, but generally it's a few WS winners in over a decade. the patriots skewed everything with brady, but generally it's the same in the nfl.

question - how many world series did the braves win again with that pitching crew in the 90s???????

there are more relative dynasties in basketball because basketball is a star driven sport. recruit like duke and kentucky and unc and you have a dynasty. same in the nba

THE WARRIORS BLEW IT. if they played that series over and over again, wouldn't you bet your house on gsw???
but really draymond gifted the ring to the cavs - let's be clear
SK21209
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,301
And1: 5,837
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
     

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#53 » by SK21209 » Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:34 pm

Downtown SD was electric last night, this is probably the biggest SD sports moment since the Chargers beat the Colts in the 07 Divisional Round. Obviously stoked to send the Dodgers packing but the Phillies are red hot, the next series won't be any easier. As others have said, I wouldn't put the Dodgers losing in the same category as the 2016 Warriors or 07 Pats given the nature of the respective sports.
SK21209
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,301
And1: 5,837
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
     

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#54 » by SK21209 » Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:39 pm

SalmonsSuperfan wrote:they probably would've won a 7 game series. padres, phillies, indians are just hot at the right time. for san diego, hader and soto were blockbuster deadline trades (juan soto being almost certainly the biggest trade in mlb history) and sucked for most of the second half but showed out in a big way vs LA.


Not sure about that. The Dodgers jumped out 5-0 after three innings in Game 1, after that it was 15-7 Padres with three straight wins. The bullpen dominated the supposed best lineup in recent memory. Hard to see the Dodgers winning three straight the way we've been playing.
Roscoe Sheed
RealGM
Posts: 10,635
And1: 4,419
Joined: May 01, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#55 » by Roscoe Sheed » Sun Oct 16, 2022 10:09 pm

Lalouie wrote:
Lucky Clover wrote:Firstly, my condolences Dodgers fans.

Secondly - question I had for sports fans - Is this just as bad as the 73-9 Warriors and 18-0 Patriots losing in the postseason? I know it's not quite the same since the Dodgers didn't make it to the championship round but they had an all-time great roster, were the clear favorite to win it all, and Dave Roberts went as far as to guarantee a title back in March. This just seems like such an astronomical defeat and upset and it came at the hands of their division rival who they had beaten 16 times this year. One post season win to show for this payroll.


NOT CLOSE

this is the way baseball is.
what is a "dynasty" in baseball. well in baseball you have to go back to the 20s and 30s with the yankees, but generally it's a few WS winners in over a decade. the patriots skewed everything with brady, but generally it's the same in the nfl.

question - how many world series did the braves win again with that pitching crew in the 90s???????

there are more relative dynasties in basketball because basketball is a star driven sport. recruit like duke and kentucky and unc and you have a dynasty. same in the nba

THE WARRIORS BLEW IT. if they played that series over and over again, wouldn't you bet your house on gsw???
but really draymond gifted the ring to the cavs - let's be clear


I agree that Green's hasty actions hurt their chances, but people need to remember that he played in game 7- a home game- and they still lost.
Roscoe Sheed
RealGM
Posts: 10,635
And1: 4,419
Joined: May 01, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#56 » by Roscoe Sheed » Sun Oct 16, 2022 10:12 pm

heezyo2o wrote:Best of 5 doesn't always lead to the best team winning. Bob Costas described it nice and simple before: their ace can pitch a great game and get a win, the bats can go cold in a game/2nd loss, 3rd game can go down to a bad bounce in a close game. Not being a homer, dodgers just lost, but they were still the "best team."

There's talk about the dodger payroll. These ridiculous 10 year contracts in baseball aren't cheap. Both the phillies and padres are top 5 in payroll. Mets were #1. Yankees always near the top. Yeah there's cleveland, but for the most part you need to spend money to win. Lots of teams spend over 200 million every season and get no where

For the best team of the season to win, it would be best to go back to AL best record vs NL best record, best of 9.

Way back in the day, that's what they would do.

However, MLB would never go for it because of lost playoff revenue.

When the '06 Cardinals won with the 13th best record in baseball, they should have reformed the set up in some way- but they never did and instead expanded how many teams get in.

What's the point of playing 162 games?
User avatar
Lalouie
RealGM
Posts: 19,449
And1: 10,069
Joined: May 12, 2017

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#57 » by Lalouie » Sun Oct 16, 2022 10:26 pm

Roscoe Sheed wrote:
Lalouie wrote:
Lucky Clover wrote:Firstly, my condolences Dodgers fans.

Secondly - question I had for sports fans - Is this just as bad as the 73-9 Warriors and 18-0 Patriots losing in the postseason? I know it's not quite the same since the Dodgers didn't make it to the championship round but they had an all-time great roster, were the clear favorite to win it all, and Dave Roberts went as far as to guarantee a title back in March. This just seems like such an astronomical defeat and upset and it came at the hands of their division rival who they had beaten 16 times this year. One post season win to show for this payroll.


NOT CLOSE

this is the way baseball is.
what is a "dynasty" in baseball. well in baseball you have to go back to the 20s and 30s with the yankees, but generally it's a few WS winners in over a decade. the patriots skewed everything with brady, but generally it's the same in the nfl.

question - how many world series did the braves win again with that pitching crew in the 90s???????

there are more relative dynasties in basketball because basketball is a star driven sport. recruit like duke and kentucky and unc and you have a dynasty. same in the nba

THE WARRIORS BLEW IT. if they played that series over and over again, wouldn't you bet your house on gsw???
but really draymond gifted the ring to the cavs - let's be clear


I agree that Green's hasty actions hurt their chances, but people need to remember that he played in game 7- a home game- and they still lost.


but anything can happen in 1 game. you have to consider that there was a cumulative momentum by the time game7 rolled around
User avatar
thejigglyroom
Rookie
Posts: 1,092
And1: 1,193
Joined: Nov 14, 2008
Location: San Francisco
         

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#58 » by thejigglyroom » Sun Oct 16, 2022 10:47 pm

KnicksGadfly wrote:
chuck_wagon44 wrote:Where is the respect for the Houston Astros, America's team!

They keep winning no matter what star(s) they lose (i.e. Correa, Springer, Cole) and they get no credit.

They have been winning since 2017 and been to the world series 3-4 times now in a short period of time.


They lost their America’s team title a while back but they’re really friggin good. Verlander is an immortal vampire


Yeah, this was funny. Someone thinking the Astros are “Americas Team?”

Nobody but Astro fans route for them. They’re the opposite of Americas Team
Nyk_Fatboy:
Carmelos better than durant, Lance stephensons better than harden, Wade, Wall, Derozan, Parker, Westbrick and i prefer antetokoumpo over Griffin, bosh and dirk but its debatable
User avatar
SFour
RealGM
Posts: 38,527
And1: 58,546
Joined: Apr 07, 2012
   

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#59 » by SFour » Sun Oct 16, 2022 11:02 pm

azcatz11 wrote:Is it a fair statement that if the Clips win a championship this year the split will be 50/50 between laker and clipper fans?



1 chip isnt going to do much.....they would need 3 in a row to even get the conversation started.
User avatar
Capn'O
Senior Mod - Knicks
Senior Mod - Knicks
Posts: 80,616
And1: 91,205
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: OT: 111 win Dodgers lose in NLDS 

Post#60 » by Capn'O » Mon Oct 17, 2022 12:06 am

This makes the Mets loss a little less embarrassing so I'm all for it.
BAF Clippers
PG: CP3 | SGA
SG: SGA | Big Ragu
SF: J Brown | Dorture Chamber
PF: Gordon | Niang
C: Capela | Sharpe

Deep Bench - Forrest | Oladipo | Fernando | Young | Svi | Cody Martin


:beer:

Return to The General MLB Board