The Draft 2007

Moderator: TyCobb

jman3134
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 19,463
And1: 1,309
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Follow me on Twitter: JTMBasketball
Contact:
 

The Draft 2007 

Post#1 » by jman3134 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 7:06 pm

No one's talking?
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

 

Post#2 » by FNQ » Thu Jun 7, 2007 7:07 pm

I'm watching it at work...it's kind of dull, Steve Phillips babbles like a complete idiot...
User avatar
bigboy1234
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,116
And1: 7
Joined: May 29, 2006

Re: The Draft 2007 

Post#3 » by bigboy1234 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 7:09 pm

jman3134 wrote:No one's talking?

Theres other mlb boards ya know. :wink:
jman3134
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 19,463
And1: 1,309
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Follow me on Twitter: JTMBasketball
Contact:
 

 

Post#4 » by jman3134 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 7:50 pm

^ Where?

It's BS. Porcello- the best pitcher in the entire draft- hasn't been selected yet. He is above and beyond every player in the entire draft. That's what I don't like about baseball. Teams draft based off of talent and draftability.
User avatar
OSBB
General Manager
Posts: 7,837
And1: 715
Joined: Aug 04, 2004

 

Post#5 » by OSBB » Thu Jun 7, 2007 7:54 pm

jman3134 wrote:^ Where?

It's BS. Porcello- the best pitcher in the entire draft- hasn't been selected yet. He is above and beyond every player in the entire draft. That's what I don't like about baseball. Teams draft based off of talent and draftability.


Wieters, Vitter, Price, Aumont are all > Porcello
User avatar
bigboy1234
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,116
And1: 7
Joined: May 29, 2006

 

Post#6 » by bigboy1234 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 7:55 pm

Minor Leagues Board, and trust me I shed a tear when my Cards just passed on him especially for a average middle infielder.
User avatar
bigboy1234
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,116
And1: 7
Joined: May 29, 2006

 

Post#7 » by bigboy1234 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 7:57 pm

OldSchoolBBall wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Wieters, Vitter, Price, Aumont are all > Porcello

And what do you base this off of? Price is better now, but Porcello has a higher ceiling. Porcello is the best pitching prospect out of HS since Beckett.
jman3134
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 19,463
And1: 1,309
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Follow me on Twitter: JTMBasketball
Contact:
 

 

Post#8 » by jman3134 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 8:01 pm

OldSchoolBBall wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Wieters, Vitter, Price, Aumont are all > Porcello


BS :nonono:
User avatar
sideshowking24
Junior
Posts: 396
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 06, 2007
Location: Stillville

 

Post#9 » by sideshowking24 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 8:24 pm

jman3134 wrote:It's BS. Porcello- the best pitcher in the entire draft- hasn't been selected yet. He is above and beyond every player in the entire draft. That's what I don't like about baseball. Teams draft based off of talent and draftability.


well what do you expect? Its not like these players are going to impact their clubs at the big league level in the very near future. and its signability, not draftability.
User avatar
OSBB
General Manager
Posts: 7,837
And1: 715
Joined: Aug 04, 2004

 

Post#10 » by OSBB » Thu Jun 7, 2007 8:39 pm

Goddamn the Tigers.

Maybin, Miller, Porcello.
Swift21
General Manager
Posts: 8,601
And1: 467
Joined: Jan 05, 2004

 

Post#11 » by Swift21 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 8:40 pm

jman3134 wrote:^ Where?

It's BS. Porcello- the best pitcher in the entire draft- hasn't been selected yet. He is above and beyond every player in the entire draft. That's what I don't like about baseball. Teams draft based off of talent and draftability.


Two words.. scott boras.

Why he slipped.
User avatar
OSBB
General Manager
Posts: 7,837
And1: 715
Joined: Aug 04, 2004

 

Post#12 » by OSBB » Thu Jun 7, 2007 8:44 pm

Jeremy Bonderman
Justin Verlander
Andrew Miller
Rick Porcello
Jair Jurjjens

Joel Zumaya at closer


Disgusting.
User avatar
randomhero423
Head Coach
Posts: 7,013
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

 

Post#13 » by randomhero423 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 10:07 pm

this is the exact reason why MLB for me isn't better than the NFL. it's really not fair to teams that they need to worry about someone's agent. in the NFL it rarely happens (reggie bush). and plus the larger market teams will ALWAYS have a distinct advantage no matter what.

i can't really say what MLB should do, since i don't really have a idea. maybe a stiffer salary cap should be put in place. it's a complex issue because it's not only MLB's fault that the owners are cheap in certain cities.

i just hope it becomes more exposed than ever and they become more concerned about this, than about what happened in the 90's....
My High School Basketball Articles:
www.nyhoops.com

My Sports Blog
myrandomsportsblog.blogspot.com
Swift21
General Manager
Posts: 8,601
And1: 467
Joined: Jan 05, 2004

 

Post#14 » by Swift21 » Thu Jun 7, 2007 11:47 pm

randomhero423 wrote:this is the exact reason why MLB for me isn't better than the NFL. it's really not fair to teams that they need to worry about someone's agent. in the NFL it rarely happens (reggie bush). and plus the larger market teams will ALWAYS have a distinct advantage no matter what.

i can't really say what MLB should do, since i don't really have a idea. maybe a stiffer salary cap should be put in place. it's a complex issue because it's not only MLB's fault that the owners are cheap in certain cities.

i just hope it becomes more exposed than ever and they become more concerned about this, than about what happened in the 90's....


The MLB still wouldn't be better then the NFL even if you could get draft picks to sign easiar. That ship will never sail.
User avatar
randomhero423
Head Coach
Posts: 7,013
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

 

Post#15 » by randomhero423 » Fri Jun 8, 2007 1:11 am

i don't mean as in business or anything. i'm talking personal opinon.

both are completely different sports though.
My High School Basketball Articles:
www.nyhoops.com

My Sports Blog
myrandomsportsblog.blogspot.com
User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,556
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

 

Post#16 » by Buck You » Fri Jun 8, 2007 1:52 am

Never put this draft on tv ever again. After the Brewers picked I was completely tuning it out. Boring.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,926
And1: 26,445
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#17 » by trwi7 » Fri Jun 8, 2007 6:07 am

ReddBogutCharlieV wrote:Never put this draft on tv ever again. After the Brewers picked I was completely tuning it out. Boring.


Huge baseball fans such as myself probably love it. At least you only get 5 minutes for a draft pick. The NFL is horrible 15 minutes in the 1st round is way too long.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
SSUBluesman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,929
And1: 820
Joined: Nov 02, 2004

 

Post#18 » by SSUBluesman » Fri Jun 8, 2007 9:24 pm

I got to watch the first part of it before having to leave, which is good since evidently the Twins pick is ****...

I came in with a small amount of info on players, who were top guys, etc. and I think they would have been better served focusing more on the player and their ability and talking to BA guys more than Steve Phillips. They should have used the BA guys for evaluations of the player, Gammons for organizational impact/reasons, and Phillips to toss in a line or two. They extended the pick time to 5 minutes for t.v., and I don't think ESPN did the most with it they could. They should have really emphasized it's differences w/other leagues drafts to help non-diehard fans get a better understanding.

That's just my quick thoughts. Like I said I only got to watch the very first part, like the first 10 picks or so. Overall it wasn't bad, hopefully ESPN learns from their first year and improves on it for the future.
Naz Reid.
kloo7
Freshman
Posts: 50
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 13, 2006

 

Post#19 » by kloo7 » Sat Jun 9, 2007 1:50 pm

The main difference between interest in the two drafts is that even the casual football fan has heard of most of the top first rounders from the NFL draft, and all of the picks from Day 1 in the NFL are expected to be on rosters the following season.

The MLB draft, for a fan like me who follows the game fairly closely, is filled with guys I have never really heard much about, and won't be appearing in my home park for another 2, 3, 4 years, albeit with the odd phenom exception here and there.

That being said, the NFL can really help itself out by limiting first round picks to 5 minutes, I mean these managers have studied and studied these guys forever, do they really need 15 minutes to make that final choice? (No Minnesota Vikings jokes need be inserted here...)

Return to The General MLB Board