theBigLip wrote:DBC10 wrote:theBigLip wrote:
Totally agree.
Before we start saying what Weaver should do, think about yourself and your job. How many times do you go over your bosses head, tell everyone your boss and others on that level are wrong, and demand that everyone follows your plan? If you do, you’re probably on Linked in later that day looking for a job.
Eh I only sort of agree with that.
Only because if people read the book, "Crucial Conversations" and other actual leadership courses they'd know how to navigate tough conversations to leadership and also leadership having an ounce of humility to take criticism from their people and accepting where they may be wrong
We have neither it seems like, nor the culture to foster that type of environment. Too bad
I agree it’s a better leadership style to be able to listen. Some do and some don’t, and it’s risky to push that too much as an underling.
But managing up is something Weaver has to be able to do in order to be successful in his current role. Is it fair to Weaver that he has to do it compared to some of his peers that do not? Debatable? But it's the reality. In many jobs this is the case. Some folks are good at this. Weaver has not shown he was during the most crucial moment.
You really can't do anything currently to get rid of Gores. He has to want to leave. But he is potentially hiring new staff underneath. So the only hope we have is to find a stronger presence underneath that enables himself to be a more effective GM.
I can't get behind folks just accepting the fact that Weaver has done a poor job being a GM because of Gores
and then being okay with him staying put. At that point you are just resigning yourself to the fact that nothing will change and your team is going to suck. Get that mentality out of here.