Pharaoh wrote:Blkbrd671 wrote:Bower: The biggest thing with young players, especially, is in order to improve they have to have to spend the time on the things they don't like or they don't do well. Because those are the biggest things to slow down their growth. In order to do that -- their instincts take over any time you're in a game situation -- the best improvement is day-to-day, repetition, repetition, repetition in an empty gym with a pin point focus on a particular skill or set of skills. Stanley's no different than the bulk of highly talented, highly rated young players coming into the league. They don't know until they get through their first year how much better they can be and how much better they would be if they added certain elements to their game. It's pretty hard to add a whole package, from year to year, but it is reasonable to have expectations to add one or two particular new elements to what you naturally do well now. When you're able to look at that over the course of a young player's development you've got a package put together by the time they've reached their third or fourth year in the league
When posters try to argue that KCP isn't the whole package despite clear improvement overall.
THIS!
He's going into his 4th year and his package consists of below average shooting, playmaking, and scoring off the dribble, and no post game.
2016 Starting SG Rankings:
Points of Drives: 17th (2.3 ppg)
FG% off Drives: 24th (43% FG)
Assists: 24th (1.8 apg)
3pt %: 27th (31% 3FG)
Catch & Shoot FG%: 30th (34% FG)
Pull-Up FG%: 20th (36% FG)
Off Screen: Among all players (all positions) with at least 80 FGAs off screens this year (his was 84), he ranks 36th of 36 players in FG% (30%), eFG% (35%), and PPP (0.68).
I don't think that is the type of package Bower was talking about that a top prospect should have by his 3rd/4th year.
If Stanley has production/efficiency like that going into his 4th year, no one is going to be pleased with how his skills are developing for an 8th overall pick.