Trade Thread (REVENGE OF THE NERDS III: TRADERS GONE WILD)

cdubbz · Post #1081 » by **cdubbz** » Sun Feb 9, 2014 2:06 pm

510TWSS wrote:
cdubbz wrote:soooooo no one likes my chris kaman idea?!

No.

Really? Jermaine O'neal and nedovic mean too much for you?

510TWSS · Post #1082 » by **510TWSS** » Sun Feb 9, 2014 6:14 pm

cdubbz wrote:
510TWSS wrote:
cdubbz wrote:soooooo no one likes my chris kaman idea?!

No.

Really? Jermaine O'neal and nedovic mean too much for you?

No, it means more that Kaman means nothing to me.

Mylie10 · Post #1083 » by **Mylie10** » Sun Feb 9, 2014 7:28 pm

Karan has quit caring about basketball.

Post #1084 » by **FNQ** » Sun Feb 9, 2014 7:47 pm

I know playing the Cavs is easy, but cmon

The Maestro · Post #1085 » by **The Maestro** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:41 am

Kuya wrote:Warriors trade to Suns: David Lee
Suns trade to Nets: Channing Frye +Wizards 1st Rd. Pick+ Suns 1st Rd. Pick
Nets trade to Warriors: Paul Pierce + Kevin Garnett

So you think the Suns would give up Frye and two #1 picks for David Lee?

If that trade was close to being true (or legal for that matter) why wouldn't we just cut out Brooklyn and take Frye and the picks for ourselves?

statsman · Post #1086 » by **statsman** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:55 am

The Maestro wrote:
Kuya wrote:Warriors trade to Suns: David Lee
Suns trade to Nets: Channing Frye +Wizards 1st Rd. Pick+ Suns 1st Rd. Pick
Nets trade to Warriors: Paul Pierce + Kevin Garnett

So you think the Suns would give up Frye and two #1 picks for David Lee?

If that trade was close to being true (or legal for that matter) why wouldn't we just cut out Brooklyn and take Frye and the picks for ourselves?

It has already been noted that this trade violates at least three CBA rules. I'm not sure why it needs further discussion. Cutting out the Nets doesn't alleviate all of the issues.

jason bourne · Post #1087 » by **jason bourne** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:47 am

oaklandwarriors wrote:Barnes looked much better. Hopefully his trade value went up. Get a nice showing at the dunk contest and he could be a good asset again.

Yup. Hope it continues to rise.

Best deal: Barnes + Lee + Klay for Love + KevMart
Middle deal: Barnes + Lee + Bazemore/Brooks for Deng (expiring) + TThompson + Waiters
Low deal: Barnes + Lee for Biyombo + MKG + BGordon (expiring)

napsDUBS · Post #1088 » by **napsDUBS** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:23 am

As anyone thinks, my trade ideas are awful but I believe that this is not so bad. So, continue reading if you're interested. It's between PHX-CHI-GSW.

Bulls get: Emeka Okafor, Harrison Barnes, P.J. Tucker and TPE
Suns get: David Lee, Mike Dunleavy
Warriors Get: Taj Gibson, Kirk Hinrich

Woah. Before any violent reactions, let me explain. I don't know if the Suns would want David Lee but they need a PF for a deep playoff run and with the addition of Mike Dunleavy, they get two veterans. They will lose Emeka Okafor who is really useless on their team, that has a large salary and P.J. Tucker, both of them are expiring.

For the Bulls, like I said, they receive two expiring deals (with one huge expiring) and the large TPE (4M Brandon Rush and 9M RIchard Jefferson) that the Warriors have. While planning to Amnesty Boozer, they would have a large salary cap to sign a superstar in the offseason, playing with Derrick Rose. Barnes in the other hand, would have a larger role with the Bulls, playing with Butler, Noah and Rose, I hope he progress there.

Well for the Warriors, with David Lee's huge contract and Klay Thompson's future extension, it would be hard to have both with limited money but receiving Gibson (with reasonable contract) and Hinrich would help in that area. Not to mention, they are a great help for a Deep Playoff run.

Thanks for reading. Now it's you turn. Thoughts? Should we hold on to David lee and Harrison Barnes or should we let them go? Next up, Upgrade on back-up big men?

Projected Lineup:
Curry/Hinrich
Thompson/Crawford
Iguodala/Green
Gibson/Speights
Bogut/Oneal/ Ezeli

Jester_ · Post #1089 » by **Jester_** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:35 pm

jason bourne wrote:
oaklandwarriors wrote:Barnes looked much better. Hopefully his trade value went up. Get a nice showing at the dunk contest and he could be a good asset again.

Yup. Hope it continues to rise.

Best deal: Barnes + Lee + Klay for Love + KevMart
Middle deal: Barnes + Lee + Bazemore/Brooks for Deng (expiring) + TThompson + Waiters
Low deal: Barnes + Lee for Biyombo + MKG + BGordon (expiring)

Too bad when his trade value rises, the idiots will perk up again and our fanbase will like him again, and we'll keep him. When have we ever sold high?

cdubbz · Post #1090 » by **cdubbz** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:48 pm

Jester_ wrote:
jason bourne wrote:
oaklandwarriors wrote:Barnes looked much better. Hopefully his trade value went up. Get a nice showing at the dunk contest and he could be a good asset again.

Yup. Hope it continues to rise.

Best deal: Barnes + Lee + Klay for Love + KevMart
Middle deal: Barnes + Lee + Bazemore/Brooks for Deng (expiring) + TThompson + Waiters
Low deal: Barnes + Lee for Biyombo + MKG + BGordon (expiring)

Too bad when his trade value rises, the idiots will perk up again and our fanbase will like him again, and we'll keep him. When have we ever sold high?

We sold high when we traded Jason Richardson for Brandan Wright :wink:

cdubbz · Post #1091 » by **cdubbz** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:49 pm

FireNellieQuick wrote:I know playing the Cavs is easy, but cmon

See. He's well rested to help the Warriors in the second half of the season. He's not playing because MDA doesn't want two post players in at the same time so he usually has Gasol in there and when gasol is out, i don't even know what MDA does. Bottom line. Trading two scrubs for a better bench with scoring ability is always good.

Post #1092 » by **Sleepy51** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:53 pm

Barnes and assorted TE cash for MWP & Beno?

Do the Knicks want cash?

15th overall · Post #1093 » by **15th overall** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:25 pm

Didn't want to start a new thread, as I'm a guest, but according to Sean Deveney, you guys are interested in Brandon Bass.

http://www.sportingnews.com/nba/story/2 ... te-bobcats

Post #1094 » by **Chris Porter's Hair** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:32 pm

Jester_ wrote:
jason bourne wrote:
oaklandwarriors wrote:Barnes looked much better. Hopefully his trade value went up. Get a nice showing at the dunk contest and he could be a good asset again.

Yup. Hope it continues to rise.

Best deal: Barnes + Lee + Klay for Love + KevMart
Middle deal: Barnes + Lee + Bazemore/Brooks for Deng (expiring) + TThompson + Waiters
Low deal: Barnes + Lee for Biyombo + MKG + BGordon (expiring)

Too bad when his trade value rises, the idiots will perk up again and our fanbase will like him again, and we'll keep him. When have we ever sold high?

I can't believe we traded Magic Randolph omg

Jester_ · Post #1095 » by **Jester_** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:42 pm

Chris Porter's Hair wrote:
Jester_ wrote:
jason bourne wrote:
Yup. Hope it continues to rise.

Best deal: Barnes + Lee + Klay for Love + KevMart
Middle deal: Barnes + Lee + Bazemore/Brooks for Deng (expiring) + TThompson + Waiters
Low deal: Barnes + Lee for Biyombo + MKG + BGordon (expiring)

Too bad when his trade value rises, the idiots will perk up again and our fanbase will like him again, and we'll keep him. When have we ever sold high?

I can't believe we traded Magic Randolph omg

Still convinced we lost that trade.

and1GS · Post #1096 » by **and1GS** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:11 pm

15th overall wrote:Didn't want to start a new thread, as I'm a guest, but according to Sean Deveney, you guys are interested in Brandon Bass.

http://www.sportingnews.com/nba/story/2 ... te-bobcats

W's part:

Among the teams interested in Bass, sources told Sporting News, are the Warriors, who still have trade exceptions from the summer deal that sent Richard Jefferson and Andris Biedrins to Utah. Backup forward Marreese Speights has been a disappointment this season, averaging 5.7 points on just 40.8 percent shooting, and the team misses the production it got from Carl Landry off the bench last year.

The Warriors don’t have a pick in this year’s draft to offer Boston, but could absorb his contract and do have a combination of young players that includes injured center Festus Ezeli, as well as rookies Nemanja Nedovic and Ognjen Kuzmic.

Such a deal could push the Warriors over the luxury tax threshold, and there is some question about whether the team would cross that line. To avoid the tax, the Warriors would have to unload Speights, who is owed $3.66 million next season.

But in the offseason, owner Joe Lacob told Sporting News, “I don’t want to pay the luxury tax, nobody wants to. That’s why it is a luxury tax, it is very punitive. But if it means winning vs. not winning, I choose winning. So that’s not an issue.”

Looks like we'd trade the TPE and a bunch of trash, but no picks. I'm in. Though Big Mouf Bass is another jump shooter...

510TWSS · Post #1097 » by **510TWSS** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:18 pm

Then again, he only needs to be better then Speights.

and1GS · Post #1098 » by **and1GS** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:24 pm

Ha, word.

I don't think you can find a better comparison to Landry than Bass FWIW. They do most of the same stuff and are under-sized, yet strong. Landry was the **** man last year, I really miss him.

Post #1099 » by **Sleepy51** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:03 pm

If we pick up yet another 4 we HAVE TO trade Barnes for a wing.

Jester_ · Post #1100 » by **Jester_** » Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:58 pm

David Lee & Harrison Barnes for Amir Johnson, Landry Fields & Julian Stone and a pick. What're the odds Toronto jumps on that?