ImageImageImageImageImage

Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT

Moderators: Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose

SinceGatlingWasARookie
RealGM
Posts: 11,336
And1: 2,689
Joined: Aug 25, 2005
Location: Northern California

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#101 » by SinceGatlingWasARookie » Sun Mar 17, 2024 3:20 am

Knicks have a 5 point lead over Kings at halftime.
wraith985
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,617
And1: 1,168
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#102 » by wraith985 » Sun Mar 17, 2024 3:40 am

Part me wants to think that if the Lakers had AD to close the game, Kerr wouldn't have put out that 3 guard lineup.

It's obviously wrong...but I want to think it.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 26,576
And1: 6,399
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#103 » by Crazy-Canuck » Sun Mar 17, 2024 3:41 am

SpreeChokeJob wrote:
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:
Crazy-Canuck wrote:Jk on bron again? Why?


JK has done well on LeBron over several games. But Wiggins also has done well on LeBron. LeBron is not all that tricky. You know what LeBron will try to do but can you stop it. Kuminga must stop LeBron from driving which is simple but difficult.

It’s Lebron chicken wing elbow push off that he gets away with. You need to have strength to withstand the first blow. Wiggins, Iguodala have it. JK is better as a 2. Moody is functionally stronger than JK and plays like small ball 4. The issue is Kerr wants to go smaller where every player has to guard a position up.


You cant really play jk at the 2 either because he's a poor screen navigator. But if you put him defending 2s, that leaves podz, cp3, klay, or steph as our big to rebound, protect paint, and box out.

Jk made a great weakside block tonight because it's easier for him when dray is controlling paint and wiggins in controlling top. Jk then needs to rebound and when he helps, it's usually just sliding 1 or 2 steps over. He's best at 4, but can look bad when it's the small ball line up. Wiggs has the same problem when he's the 4 with the 3 guards. He wants to spy and help, but now that leaves the paint empty usually with a couple of smalls. And we know kerr loves to trot out 3 smalls.
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 18,578
And1: 7,177
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#104 » by cpower » Sun Mar 17, 2024 3:49 am

SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:Knicks have a 5 point lead over Kings at halftime.

Kings will win. They are on a roll now
SpreeChokeJob
Veteran
Posts: 2,599
And1: 1,401
Joined: Jun 30, 2017

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#105 » by SpreeChokeJob » Sun Mar 17, 2024 4:24 am

Crazy-Canuck wrote:
SpreeChokeJob wrote:
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:
JK has done well on LeBron over several games. But Wiggins also has done well on LeBron. LeBron is not all that tricky. You know what LeBron will try to do but can you stop it. Kuminga must stop LeBron from driving which is simple but difficult.

It’s Lebron chicken wing elbow push off that he gets away with. You need to have strength to withstand the first blow. Wiggins, Iguodala have it. JK is better as a 2. Moody is functionally stronger than JK and plays like small ball 4. The issue is Kerr wants to go smaller where every player has to guard a position up.


You cant really play jk at the 2 either because he's a poor screen navigator. But if you put him defending 2s, that leaves podz, cp3, klay, or steph as our big to rebound, protect paint, and box out.

Jk made a great weakside block tonight because it's easier for him when dray is controlling paint and wiggins in controlling top. Jk then needs to rebound and when he helps, it's usually just sliding 1 or 2 steps over. He's best at 4, but can look bad when it's the small ball line up. Wiggs has the same problem when he's the 4 with the 3 guards. He wants to spy and help, but now that leaves the paint empty usually with a couple of smalls. And we know kerr loves to trot out 3 smalls.

You left out Moodz. If Kerr would play him, he would be the equivalent of small ball 4. The upside of playing Moody is much greater than what Podz is giving. Podz has already reached his limits for this year.

This game showed that while the Lakers are still an inferior team. They are still slightly better than the Warriors with both sides healthy. It will be difficult to beat them in the playin with Kerr’s usual tactics. I would bet the Warriors to lose if Kerr runs the same BS he has. They have to get to 7th or 8th spot or they will be out.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 26,576
And1: 6,399
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#106 » by Crazy-Canuck » Sun Mar 17, 2024 4:52 am

SpreeChokeJob wrote:
Crazy-Canuck wrote:
SpreeChokeJob wrote:It’s Lebron chicken wing elbow push off that he gets away with. You need to have strength to withstand the first blow. Wiggins, Iguodala have it. JK is better as a 2. Moody is functionally stronger than JK and plays like small ball 4. The issue is Kerr wants to go smaller where every player has to guard a position up.


You cant really play jk at the 2 either because he's a poor screen navigator. But if you put him defending 2s, that leaves podz, cp3, klay, or steph as our big to rebound, protect paint, and box out.

Jk made a great weakside block tonight because it's easier for him when dray is controlling paint and wiggins in controlling top. Jk then needs to rebound and when he helps, it's usually just sliding 1 or 2 steps over. He's best at 4, but can look bad when it's the small ball line up. Wiggs has the same problem when he's the 4 with the 3 guards. He wants to spy and help, but now that leaves the paint empty usually with a couple of smalls. And we know kerr loves to trot out 3 smalls.

You left out Moodz. If Kerr would play him, he would be the equivalent of small ball 4. The upside of playing Moody is much greater than what Podz is giving. Podz has already reached his limits for this year.

This game showed that while the Lakers are still an inferior team. They are still slightly better than the Warriors with both sides healthy. It will be difficult to beat them in the playin with Kerr’s usual tactics. I would bet the Warriors to lose if Kerr runs the same BS he has. They have to get to 7th or 8th spot or they will be out.


This is kerr we are talking about, I didn't feel the need to mention moody.
superunknown
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,422
And1: 454
Joined: Sep 25, 2018
       

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#107 » by superunknown » Sun Mar 17, 2024 7:44 am

Street clothes doesn't leave the game dubs likely lose this one. kerr really doesn't know how to play against the lakers.
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 57,406
And1: 15,806
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#108 » by floppymoose » Sun Mar 17, 2024 8:42 am

Refs and game clock:

Image
svart
Analyst
Posts: 3,662
And1: 3,395
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
Location: Romania
 

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#109 » by svart » Sun Mar 17, 2024 12:11 pm

Player of the game: TJD. He kept AD scoreless in the last three quarters.

LE: now imagine Dray did that......
''You don't need to be serious to be focused"
Philosopher and basketball player JaVale McGee
SpreeChokeJob
Veteran
Posts: 2,599
And1: 1,401
Joined: Jun 30, 2017

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#110 » by SpreeChokeJob » Sun Mar 17, 2024 2:27 pm

Crazy-Canuck wrote:
SpreeChokeJob wrote:
Crazy-Canuck wrote:
You cant really play jk at the 2 either because he's a poor screen navigator. But if you put him defending 2s, that leaves podz, cp3, klay, or steph as our big to rebound, protect paint, and box out.

Jk made a great weakside block tonight because it's easier for him when dray is controlling paint and wiggins in controlling top. Jk then needs to rebound and when he helps, it's usually just sliding 1 or 2 steps over. He's best at 4, but can look bad when it's the small ball line up. Wiggs has the same problem when he's the 4 with the 3 guards. He wants to spy and help, but now that leaves the paint empty usually with a couple of smalls. And we know kerr loves to trot out 3 smalls.

You left out Moodz. If Kerr would play him, he would be the equivalent of small ball 4. The upside of playing Moody is much greater than what Podz is giving. Podz has already reached his limits for this year.

This game showed that while the Lakers are still an inferior team. They are still slightly better than the Warriors with both sides healthy. It will be difficult to beat them in the playin with Kerr’s usual tactics. I would bet the Warriors to lose if Kerr runs the same BS he has. They have to get to 7th or 8th spot or they will be out.


This is kerr we are talking about, I didn't feel the need to mention moody.

If this is Kerr we are talking about, we don’t even need to discuss anything because we already know what he’s going to do. He’s going to play the current starting lineup. Lebron won’t treat the playin game like a regular season game, will attack all game like the 4th quarter, Kerr will still stick to his rotations, including his 3g lineup, team will be down double digits, in an act of desperation he will bring out Moody after not playing him the whole season, too little too late, team gets bounced, Kerr gives his usual sound bites at the postgame press conference, real gm gets disgruntled for a week, and then off to discussing the draft and summer league.

My only hope is they are playing 3D chess and are so confident that they are positioning for the Thunder. They should play Moody though. From the times he played, his level of impact is about Podz level and he’s a third year player losing all minutes to first year players. He might as well do a JK and force his way. He’s only got a year left on his contract and I know he can help a team. This is some really messed up stuff going on. If it was any other player than Moody the locker room would be disgruntled.

Kerr has been a step too late giving consistent minutes to JK and moving Klay to the bench and finally playing Saric limited minutes. He’s always exhaust all failure before making a move.
User avatar
Onus
RealGM
Posts: 18,894
And1: 5,294
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: NOA

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#111 » by Onus » Sun Mar 17, 2024 2:56 pm

Cp only played 13 min. Crazy that podz led the team in minutes at 34. But I guess he did lead the team in plus minus.
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
ILOVEIT
RealGM
Posts: 14,631
And1: 3,414
Joined: May 28, 2004

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#112 » by ILOVEIT » Mon Mar 18, 2024 3:10 am

I'll take Podz closing over CP every day. Podz is a fighter...smart....tough and able to defend bigger dudes. Cp3 is a ghost of his former self and even then he was a target to go at.
closing lineup should always be:

Podz, Curry, Wiggins, Kuminga, Draymond
2021/22 - The return of the Ring.
User avatar
Coxy
RealGM
Posts: 48,019
And1: 14,665
Joined: Jun 17, 2008
   

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#113 » by Coxy » Mon Mar 18, 2024 3:23 am

ILOVEIT wrote:I'll take Podz closing over CP every day. Podz is a fighter...smart....tough and able to defend bigger dudes. Cp3 is a ghost of his former self and even then he was a target to go at.
closing lineup should always be:

Podz, Curry, Wiggins, Kuminga, Draymond


Agree, but that lineup is far too big for Warior ball.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 26,576
And1: 6,399
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#114 » by Crazy-Canuck » Mon Mar 18, 2024 3:34 am

ILOVEIT wrote:I'll take Podz closing over CP every day. Podz is a fighter...smart....tough and able to defend bigger dudes. Cp3 is a ghost of his former self and even then he was a target to go at.
closing lineup should always be:

Podz, Curry, Wiggins, Kuminga, Draymond


He's not going to close with that group.

He wants too close with steph, klay, podz, jk, and dray. The only reason he didn't last night was because wiggins had to do a jump ball, so he took podz out. Podz was shocked that he left the floor. Tells me that his closing unit is set. Refs saved kerr from himself.

No idea why no one in the media asks kerr about his insistence on playing 3 smalls, especially to close games when their lack of defense and rebounding becomes even more apparent.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 26,576
And1: 6,399
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#115 » by Crazy-Canuck » Mon Mar 18, 2024 3:48 am

Read on Twitter



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
superunknown
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,422
And1: 454
Joined: Sep 25, 2018
       

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#116 » by superunknown » Mon Mar 18, 2024 9:22 am

Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Read on Twitter



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


:lol:

but why provokes that psycho of steph? like Dlo didn't know. and he played in the same team with him. what an idiot.
superunknown
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,422
And1: 454
Joined: Sep 25, 2018
       

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#117 » by superunknown » Mon Mar 18, 2024 9:32 am

Crazy-Canuck wrote:
ILOVEIT wrote:I'll take Podz closing over CP every day. Podz is a fighter...smart....tough and able to defend bigger dudes. Cp3 is a ghost of his former self and even then he was a target to go at.
closing lineup should always be:

Podz, Curry, Wiggins, Kuminga, Draymond


He's not going to close with that group.

He wants too close with steph, klay, podz, jk, and dray. The only reason he didn't last night was because wiggins had to do a jump ball, so he took podz out. Podz was shocked that he left the floor. Tells me that his closing unit is set. Refs saved kerr from himself.

No idea why no one in the media asks kerr about his insistence on playing 3 smalls, especially to close games when their lack of defense and rebounding becomes even more apparent.


if this true then they're fu**ed.
and kerr is past help.
User avatar
Onus
RealGM
Posts: 18,894
And1: 5,294
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: NOA

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#118 » by Onus » Mon Mar 18, 2024 12:47 pm

superunknown wrote:
Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Read on Twitter



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


:lol:

but why provokes that psycho of steph? like Dlo didn't know. and he played in the same team with him. what an idiot.

But he didn’t really play with Steph. Wasn’t that the year Steph was out injured?
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
superunknown
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,422
And1: 454
Joined: Sep 25, 2018
       

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#119 » by superunknown » Mon Mar 18, 2024 1:33 pm

Onus wrote:
superunknown wrote:
Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Read on Twitter



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


:lol:

but why provokes that psycho of steph? like Dlo didn't know. and he played in the same team with him. what an idiot.

But he didn’t really play with Steph. Wasn’t that the year Steph was out injured?


yes, but I mean, they've been teammates. he should know better the fu**er.
CDM_Stats
Head Coach
Posts: 6,339
And1: 2,053
Joined: Oct 03, 2022
 

Re: Game 66: Warriors @ Lakers 5:30pm PT 

Post#120 » by CDM_Stats » Mon Mar 18, 2024 4:29 pm

Crazy-Canuck wrote:No idea why no one in the media asks kerr about his insistence on playing 3 smalls, especially to close games when their lack of defense and rebounding becomes even more apparent.


This is why I dont get excited about wins anymore.. its not indicative of anything. The team won historically, not because of our offense, but because of defense. That gets lost in the shuffle because 2 guys, Steph/Klay (and for a while, KD) provide 3-5 players' worth of offense, and because of that they could get play defense only guys for long stretches, something other teams couldnt do

Now Kerr is leaning on old, smaller guys to keep up offensively, but these guys have no defensive upside. The likely smart move would be leaning on the younger guys, who can keep up defensively, but have to realize any potential offensive upside. We dont know if they can, or if they'd develop with PT, because Kerr is going for the route he always claimed he wasn't - chasing empty wins

Return to Golden State Warriors