ImageImageImageImageImage

4/2- Game 75: Mavericks (45-29) @ Warriors (40-34) 7pm TNT

Moderators: Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose

michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 11,102
And1: 4,797
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: 4/2- Game 75: Mavericks (45-29) @ Warriors (40-34) 7pm TNT 

Post#301 » by michaelm » Thu Apr 4, 2024 12:25 am

Onus wrote:
Onus wrote:
vagelis wrote:If Warriors win 6 of their 7 remaining games what will be their ranking at the end?

Have Warriors any chance to avoid play in?

Highly unlikely but there's a chance

Dallas - 4 games (3 games if we beat them)
ATL, GSW, HOU, CHA, MIA, DET, OKC

New Orleans - 4 games (3 games if we beat them)
ORL, SA, PHX, POR, SAC, GSW, LAL

Sacramento - 3 games
NY, BOS, BKN, OKC, NOP, PHX, POR

Phoenix - 3 games (actually 4 losses back since they have the tie breaker)
CLE, MIN, NOP, LAC, LAC, SAC, MIN

Lakers - 1.5 games (.5 game if we beat them)
WAS, CLE, MIN, GSW, MEM, NOP

Warriors
DAL, UTAH, LAL, POR, NOP, UTAH

Basically we need to win out and then Dallas, NOP, SAC, PHX need to drop 3 more games and the Lakers have to drop a game somewhere. It seems like they all have games against someone else so they will have to lose some games.

The best path is Dallas and PHX get 5 and 6 in whatever order. Lakers get 7, we get 8 and then NOP or SAC get 9 and 10. That way we get to stay in CA and we don't have to take a long flight to New Orleans.

Given their away record this year I am not sure away games are a disadvantage. One of the players, Steph iirc, has said maybe they will have to stay in a hotel pre-game in San Francisco so it is more like playing away.

Definitely want to avoid the Lakers if at all possible, for both match-up and officiating/likely FT disparity reasons, and particularly would like to avoid playing them in LA where Curry has historically shot poorly.
vvoland
Senior
Posts: 646
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: 4/2- Game 75: Mavericks (45-29) @ Warriors (40-34) 7pm TNT 

Post#302 » by vvoland » Thu Apr 4, 2024 2:02 am

michaelm wrote:
Onus wrote:
Onus wrote:Highly unlikely but there's a chance

Dallas - 4 games (3 games if we beat them)
ATL, GSW, HOU, CHA, MIA, DET, OKC

New Orleans - 4 games (3 games if we beat them)
ORL, SA, PHX, POR, SAC, GSW, LAL

Sacramento - 3 games
NY, BOS, BKN, OKC, NOP, PHX, POR

Phoenix - 3 games (actually 4 losses back since they have the tie breaker)
CLE, MIN, NOP, LAC, LAC, SAC, MIN

Lakers - 1.5 games (.5 game if we beat them)
WAS, CLE, MIN, GSW, MEM, NOP

Warriors
DAL, UTAH, LAL, POR, NOP, UTAH

Basically we need to win out and then Dallas, NOP, SAC, PHX need to drop 3 more games and the Lakers have to drop a game somewhere. It seems like they all have games against someone else so they will have to lose some games.

The best path is Dallas and PHX get 5 and 6 in whatever order. Lakers get 7, we get 8 and then NOP or SAC get 9 and 10. That way we get to stay in CA and we don't have to take a long flight to New Orleans.

Given their away record this year I am not sure away games are a disadvantage. One of the players, Steph iirc, has said maybe they will have to stay in a hotel pre-game in San Francisco so it is more like playing away.

Definitely want to avoid the Lakers if at all possible, for both match-up and officiating/likely FT disparity reasons, and particularly would like to avoid playing them in LA where Curry has historically shot poorly.


I don't think there's a chance to get out of the playin but if things break right, we might climb up to 8 with a chance to win 1 game to get into the 7, avoid Denver and get a few days off rest before the playoffs start. It looks like it'll depend on whether or not kawhi will play in the two phx games. Sac and phx have real tough schedules
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 26,581
And1: 6,402
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: 4/2- Game 75: Mavericks (45-29) @ Warriors (40-34) 7pm TNT 

Post#303 » by Crazy-Canuck » Thu Apr 4, 2024 3:32 am

Timpf did a good dive into our defense on his latest video.

Mavs scored 1.14 ppp in transition, but only. 8 ppp in hslfcourt.

Our transition stinks because of turnovers and bad shots, but just as important it's our lack of size. If Wiggins is attacking the rim or crashing the boards (because he's normally the first one back), it leaves us with small guards as the transition defender where players can just go over them.

I mentioned earlier that I think our schemes have changed the last 5 games.

We look more like browns defense than Atkinson. All year we gave up the switch, lately not so much. And when we did give up a switch, we didnt play it straight up. And all year we gave up open 3 pointers to the wrong guys, and again not so much recently. We are driving the action into low percentage shooters by design. I dont know if we have a new person calling the shots or if it was a personnel problem. Bizarre flip of the switch.

https://youtu.be/wVPRhD644fM?si=FGg3pLbVDC-0kR9u

Return to Golden State Warriors