MickeyDavis wrote:Whether it's Brady (who could be just as bad) or someone else I hope Olsen is one and done as the main analyst.
I agree. That team as a whole is meh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
MickeyDavis wrote:Whether it's Brady (who could be just as bad) or someone else I hope Olsen is one and done as the main analyst.
BUCKnation wrote:So I didn't notice Quay much in the first game and know he got injured, but it seemed like he was everyone in game 2 and, idk if its his single digit number, but he looks like an absolutely massive human, in a game of other big dudes.
Profound23 wrote:BUCKnation wrote:So I didn't notice Quay much in the first game and know he got injured, but it seemed like he was everyone in game 2 and, idk if its his single digit number, but he looks like an absolutely massive human, in a game of other big dudes.
He made a few great plays in the Vikings game before being injured. In fact, he covered Jefferson on one play better than most of our DBs did.
neiLz wrote:packers play zone a bunch, would this be a game to man up? bucs literally have zero receivers and no gronk. are they going to blitz too? i don't think i've seen them blitz once in 2 games. Gary and Preston have been getting a TON of pressure, but would be nice to give them 2 some help.
ReasonablySober wrote:The Packers, maybe more than any other team, should be playing as much man as possible.
Ron Swanson wrote:I think we're all getting sick of the weekly "will he, won't he" song and dance, but then maybe you should've just shut him down on IR and reevaluated after Week 7-8.