ImageImage

NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,805
And1: 27,380
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#271 » by trwi7 » Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:25 pm

I'm not really nervous since I'm not expecting the Packers to win.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#272 » by xTitan » Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:27 pm

emunney wrote:I wonder is Ross can play in the backfield with an offseason of work. He's a big dude.


I am becoming a big fan of Ross, may even be a better steal than Harris. McGinn said in his online chat the Ross will be playing WR very very very soon. Ross is a typical Packer wr, smart, strong, runs well in the open field....excited to see how he and Boykin progress.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#273 » by xTitan » Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:28 pm

I don't want the season to end, but i just can;t pick the finesse Packers against such a physical team who dominated then earlier in the season. Having said that any time you have A. Rodj you have a shot and if A. Rodj is going to go down as one of the greats this is a win he can get with some help from his friends.
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,708
And1: 15,235
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#274 » by rilamann » Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:58 pm

xTitan wrote:I don't want the season to end, but i just can;t pick the finesse Packers against such a physical team who dominated then earlier in the season. Having said that any time you have A. Rodj you have a shot and if A. Rodj is going to go down as one of the greats this is a win he can get with some help from his friends.


That';s how I feel,I just can't pick the Packers to win a big game vs a physical team,we all know what happened last season when they played the Giants in this game.Not to mention what happened when they played the Giants 2 months ago.

But the Rodgers factor is big so who knows what might happen.With that said Rodgers can have have the motivation to play the game of his life but it's not going to matter if our offensive line doesn't protect him obviously.Having to count on this Packers O-Line to come up big in this game scares the hell out of me.


The biggest factor to me is Justin Smith,if he is anywhere near 90% the Packers aren't winning this game.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
whatthe_buck!?
Banned User
Posts: 5,142
And1: 163
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#275 » by whatthe_buck!? » Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:46 pm

rilamann wrote:
xTitan wrote:I don't want the season to end, but i just can;t pick the finesse Packers against such a physical team who dominated then earlier in the season. Having said that any time you have A. Rodj you have a shot and if A. Rodj is going to go down as one of the greats this is a win he can get with some help from his friends.


That';s how I feel,I just can't pick the Packers to win a big game vs a physical team,we all know what happened last season when they played the Giants in this game.Not to mention what happened when they played the Giants 2 months ago.

But the Rodgers factor is big so who knows what might happen.With that said Rodgers can have have the motivation to play the game of his life but it's not going to matter if our offensive line doesn't protect him obviously.Having to count on this Packers O-Line to come up big in this game scares the hell out of me.


The biggest factor to me is Justin Smith,if he is anywhere near 90% the Packers aren't winning this game.

Do u guys really believe this stuff? Especially the part about if Justin Smith is 90% we lose? He was 100% in week one, the packers were a lot shakier earlier this season, and if u guys had taken the time to rewatch the game u guys could've seen that that game, dispite us being out-physicalled by the niners, easily could've resulted in a packer victory. I mean I get it, yes this game will be tough, yes we may have a more-than-50%-chance of losing, and yes the niners match up REALLY well against us, but thinking we will lose this game for sure because of this or that thing is crazy IMO. GET IT TOGETHER PACKER FANS! WE HAVE A REALLY GOOD TEAM AND THE BEST QB IN THE GAME!! WE HAVE A GOOD CHANCE OF LOSING THIS GAME BUT WE ALSO HAVE A GOOD CHANCE OF WINNING IT!!! EVERYBODY MAN UP, STOP ACTING LIKE A BUNCH OF GODD*MN P*SSIES, AND STOP PREPARING YOURSELVES FOR THE DISAPPOINTMENT AND HURT OF DEFEAT BY ASSUMING A LOSS!!!! IF WE LOSE IT SHOULD HURT U *SSHOLES!!!!!!
*slowly calms down and regains composure*
User avatar
Marley2Hendrix
RealGM
Posts: 11,713
And1: 2,599
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
     

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#276 » by Marley2Hendrix » Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:57 pm

whatthe_buck!? wrote:
rilamann wrote:
xTitan wrote:I don't want the season to end, but i just can;t pick the finesse Packers against such a physical team who dominated then earlier in the season. Having said that any time you have A. Rodj you have a shot and if A. Rodj is going to go down as one of the greats this is a win he can get with some help from his friends.


That';s how I feel,I just can't pick the Packers to win a big game vs a physical team,we all know what happened last season when they played the Giants in this game.Not to mention what happened when they played the Giants 2 months ago.

But the Rodgers factor is big so who knows what might happen.With that said Rodgers can have have the motivation to play the game of his life but it's not going to matter if our offensive line doesn't protect him obviously.Having to count on this Packers O-Line to come up big in this game scares the hell out of me.


The biggest factor to me is Justin Smith,if he is anywhere near 90% the Packers aren't winning this game.

Do u guys really believe this stuff? Especially the part about if Justin Smith is 90% we lose? He was 100% in week one, the packers were a lot shakier earlier this season, and if u guys had taken the time to rewatch the game u guys could've seen that that game, dispite us being out-physicalled by the niners, easily could've resulted in a packer victory. I mean I get it, yes this game will be tough, yes we may have a more-than-50%-chance of losing, and yes the niners match up REALLY well against us, but thinking we will lose this game for sure because of this or that thing is crazy IMO. GET IT TOGETHER PACKER FANS! WE HAVE A REALLY GOOD TEAM AND THE BEST QB IN THE GAME!! WE HAVE A GOOD CHANCE OF LOSING THIS GAME BUT WE ALSO HAVE A GOOD CHANCE OF WINNING IT!!! EVERYBODY MAN UP, STOP ACTING LIKE A BUNCH OF GODD*MN P*SSIES, AND STOP PREPARING YOURSELVES FOR THE DISAPPOINTMENT AND HURT OF DEFEAT BY ASSUMING A LOSS!!!! IF WE LOSE IT SHOULD HURT U *SSHOLES!!!!!!
*slowly calms down and regains composure*


yeah, awful lot of vagina-y vibes in this thread. It's kaep. We got this by 10.
You gotta make it sexy! Hips and nips, otherwise I'm not eating.
whatthe_buck!?
Banned User
Posts: 5,142
And1: 163
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#277 » by whatthe_buck!? » Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:15 pm

Marley2Hendrix wrote:yeah, awful lot of vagina-y vibes in this thread. It's kaep. We got this by 10.

Well, I'm not gonna go as far as u and predict a victory, but I like that you're at least willing to go out on a limb and be crushed if the packers lose...
Anyway, here's a clip from the deer hunter that IMO sums up what the collective attitude of this board should be going into this game. MAN UP PACKER NATION!!!! STOP BEING AFRAID OF THE F*CKING NINERS!!!! AROD AIN'T SCURRED!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMjZKXaptBk
jimmybones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,692
And1: 3,187
Joined: May 29, 2009
Location: MKE
     

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#278 » by jimmybones » Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:16 pm

emunney wrote:I wonder is Ross can play in the backfield with an offseason of work. He's a big dude.


Wow, I didn't even realize he's that big. 6'0 215 is a tank for WR/return man. He moves like a small guy. He might have some potential in a Cobb type role going forward. That's pretty awesome to think about..
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,883
And1: 41,262
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#279 » by emunney » Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:21 pm

jimmybones wrote:
emunney wrote:I wonder is Ross can play in the backfield with an offseason of work. He's a big dude.


Wow, I didn't even realize he's that big. 6'0 215 is a tank for WR/return man. He moves like a small guy. He might have some potential in a Cobb type role going forward. That's pretty awesome to think about..


He's got all kinds of strength records for Cal receivers.

From his Cal bio:

a tremendous athlete who registered top all-time marks in multiple strength and conditioning activities among Cal receivers, including the power clean (352 pounds), bench press (350 pounds, tied for the school's top mark at his position), squat (500 pounds) and vertical jump (37.5 inches).


Kind of a beast, you can see he's not just a workout warrior either. Arm tackles are not a thing w/ him.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,152
And1: 15,031
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#280 » by Ayt » Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:13 pm

Pack by 13. Book it.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,927
And1: 37,066
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#281 » by RIPskaterdude » Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:17 pm

Neither team will win by more than 10
Image
whatthe_buck!?
Banned User
Posts: 5,142
And1: 163
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

Re: NFC Divisional Round: Niners Lead-Up 

Post#282 » by whatthe_buck!? » Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:25 pm

Ok I'll bite. I say packers by 6. Repeat of the 2010 Super Bowl, we get a little lead, but then have to fight off a late charge to hold on for the victory.

Return to Green Bay Packers