Game 2: Bears at Packers - 7:20 - NBC

Mags FTW · Post #281 » by **Mags FTW** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:54 am

Can't believe they haven't put a chip in the ball yet.

kaulkhara15 · Post #282 » by **kaulkhara15** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:55 am

I really feel like we shouldn’t be 50-50 with Jones and Dillon. 60-40 IMO.

TroyD92 · Post #283 » by **TroyD92** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:56 am

kaulkhara15 wrote:I really feel like we shouldn’t be 50-50 with Jones and Dillon. 60-40 IMO.

Its early. I don't think you want to wear either one out.

BigDee · Post #284 » by **BigDee** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:57 am

Let get the dagger.

Turk Nowitzki · Post #285 » by **Turk Nowitzki** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:57 am

Collinsworth acting like the Bears have been right in this game the entire time when they should be down 30 if we hadn't shot ourselves in the foot a bunch of times.

raysbookclub · Post #286 » by **raysbookclub** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:59 am

Yeah don't want to wear them out. I wouldn't mind giving Patrick Taylor runs here at the end since they brought him up anyway.

dogswithbeesintheirmouths · Post #287 » by **dogswithbeesintheirmouths** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:59 am

Mags FTW wrote:Can't believe they haven't put a chip in the ball yet.

There actually is a chip in the ball, but it is in the middle of the ball so they just use it for next gen stats, not spotting the ball

Dennis Reynolds · Post #288 » by **Dennis Reynolds** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:00 am

TroyD92 wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:
Dennis Reynolds wrote:
This is pretty much the same defense from the last season. The guys we added were supposed to be an upgrade and we have the same defensive coordinator so yes, my patience is running low.

2 games. Held the Vikings to 6 points in the second half and the bears to 10 points ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Offense has been the problem. I really don't understand the expectations on defenses in the modern game.

Don't be the worst run defense in history, don't leave the best opposing player wide open on almost every play? I was gonna say live up to the hype and be a top 5 defense but I guess I'll have to settle for those 2 things.

Mags FTW · Post #289 » by **Mags FTW** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:01 am

Why do they insist on taking a TO in these situations? Is it that hard to snap the FG with 3 seconds left on the play clock?

dogswithbeesintheirmouths · Post #290 » by **dogswithbeesintheirmouths** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:02 am

Mags FTW wrote:Why do they insist on taking a TO in these situations? Is it that hard to snap the FG with 3 seconds left on the play clock?

Or just take the delay of game

Post #291 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:04 am

What a pick.

Post #292 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:04 am

Fields is a **** QB

BigDee · Post #293 » by **BigDee** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:04 am

Game!

Mags FTW · Post #294 » by **Mags FTW** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:04 am

dogswithbeesintheirmouths wrote:
Mags FTW wrote:Can't believe they haven't put a chip in the ball yet.

There actually is a chip in the ball, but it is in the middle of the ball so they just use it for next gen stats, not spotting the ball

Even if it's in the middle, simple math can tell you if it crossed the goal line.

TroyD92 · Post #295 » by **TroyD92** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:04 am

Ja moneyyy

Dennis Reynolds · Post #296 » by **Dennis Reynolds** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:06 am

Lovely way to finish the game.

BigDee · Post #297 » by **BigDee** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:06 am

What a play by Jaire

Dennis Reynolds · Post #298 » by **Dennis Reynolds** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:07 am

Mags FTW wrote:
dogswithbeesintheirmouths wrote:
Mags FTW wrote:Can't believe they haven't put a chip in the ball yet.

There actually is a chip in the ball, but it is in the middle of the ball so they just use it for next gen stats, not spotting the ball

Even if it's in the middle, simple math can tell you if it crossed the goal line.

They could also easily put 3+ chips in the ball if necessary.

dogswithbeesintheirmouths · Post #299 » by **dogswithbeesintheirmouths** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:07 am

Mags FTW wrote:
dogswithbeesintheirmouths wrote:
Mags FTW wrote:Can't believe they haven't put a chip in the ball yet.

There actually is a chip in the ball, but it is in the middle of the ball so they just use it for next gen stats, not spotting the ball

Even if it's in the middle, simple math can tell you if it crossed the goal line.

That would only work when the ball is pointing straight ahead. If you are twisted to the side at all you would end up spotting it too far forward. I think they would need 2 sensors, one in each end of the ball.

Post #300 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Sep 19, 2022 3:08 am

Frank looks fun