Jets Postgame

Post #21 » by **Jollay** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 12:41 am

I saw 4-3 both halves, but IDK. Whatever.

At this point for me it's just results or not results with Capers.

DanoMac · Post #22 » by **DanoMac** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 12:48 am

Really wanna see more Barrington at this point

Ayt · Post #23 » by **Ayt** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 12:51 am

DanoMac wrote:
Ayt wrote:
DanoMac wrote:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/jbhirschhorn/status/511298659938344960[/tweet]

Or does he have it mixed up?

Um. I don't know what he's talking about. Does he even NFL?

I don't know how to respond to that since it is so incorrect.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/jbhirschhorn/status/511312711863795712[/tweet]

Is that someone I should care about or just some random?

Regardless, they are obviously wrong and they would know that if they NFL'd.

skones · Post #24 » by **skones** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 12:56 am

Ayt wrote:
DanoMac wrote:
Ayt wrote:
Um. I don't know what he's talking about. Does he even NFL?

I don't know how to respond to that since it is so incorrect.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/jbhirschhorn/status/511312711863795712[/tweet]

Is that someone I should care about or just some random?

Regardless, they are obviously wrong and they would know that if they NFL'd.

In looking at twitter, several writers disagree with you. A lot of them pointing out the Packers were going with the big quad 4-3 look in the first half.

MartyConlonOnTheRun · Post #25 » by **MartyConlonOnTheRun** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 12:57 am

Ayt wrote:
DanoMac wrote:
Ayt wrote:
Um. I don't know what he's talking about. Does he even NFL?

I don't know how to respond to that since it is so incorrect.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/jbhirschhorn/status/511312711863795712[/tweet]

Is that someone I should care about or just some random?

Regardless, they are obviously wrong and they would know that if they NFL'd.

Former president of MySpace. Kind of a big deal

DanoMac · Post #26 » by **DanoMac** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:00 am

Ayt wrote:Is that someone I should care about or just some random?

Regardless, they are obviously wrong and they would know that if they NFL'd.

Your reply sounds better the second time around

I know of Jason because he was one of the top posters at FF for a long time, and writes for SBNation and AcmePackingCo now. His football knowledge was always top notch in my experiences of seeing him post, and know he was the most widely respected guy on that forum before leaving.

I'm not disagreeing with either of you, just trying to fully understand where the changes need to take place.

Post #27 » by **paulpressey25** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:15 am

Ayt wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:I saw a few different thing on twitter that boykin was benched for Adams. Anyone know why? Also TE who?

Probably because he couldn't get open. He also had a huge drop when he did have a chance on the pass within the 5 on 3rd down where we ended up having to settle for a FG after his drop. Those are plays he has to make.

This is where Rodgers is really missing Jennings, Jones and Finley.

We are going to need Adams to grow up quickly.

MartyConlonOnTheRun · Post #28 » by **MartyConlonOnTheRun** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:22 am

Why couldn't we accept both unnecessary roughness penalties? Seems like a dumb rule since it would allow teams to play dirty knowing they already got one flag, why not keep going.

If we should've got both, I wonder if mm would've done an inside. Kicking off from there 35 basically gives you every incentive to go for it. I did think it was cool/smart play trying to pin them inside the 15 inside of just booming it out of the endzone.

emunney · Post #29 » by **emunney** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:30 am

paulpressey25 wrote:
Ayt wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:I saw a few different thing on twitter that boykin was benched for Adams. Anyone know why? Also TE who?

Probably because he couldn't get open. He also had a huge drop when he did have a chance on the pass within the 5 on 3rd down where we ended up having to settle for a FG after his drop. Those are plays he has to make.

This is where Rodgers is really missing Jennings, Jones and Finley.

We are going to need Adams to grow up quickly.

Seems like he's game, but I wouldn't write off Boykin. He struggled today, but he'll find matchups he can exploit going forward.

HKPackFan · Post #30 » by **HKPackFan** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:34 am

My bro was at the game. He said he saw boykin limping around. He could barely walk...that's the reason adams took over at #3.

Absolutely agree we are missing finley and at least 1 more good wr like jennings.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using RealGM Forums mobile app

Turk Nowitzki · Post #31 » by **Turk Nowitzki** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:38 am

James Jones would be nice but I think we are really missing Finley. A good receiving threat from the TE spot just opens up the passing game so much more.

rilamann · Post #32 » by **rilamann** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:50 am

paulpressey25 wrote:
Ayt wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:I saw a few different thing on twitter that boykin was benched for Adams. Anyone know why? Also TE who?

Probably because he couldn't get open. He also had a huge drop when he did have a chance on the pass within the 5 on 3rd down where we ended up having to settle for a FG after his drop. Those are plays he has to make.

This is where Rodgers is really missing Jennings, Jones and Finley.

We are going to need Adams to grow up quickly.

Yeah I wasn't and I'm still not a fan of not retaining James Jones,that game against Seattle was a game right off that bat in which we really missed not having a guy like him.

But if Adams can make some plays and grow up quickly as you said it will be one of those hindsight moves where you say yeah Teddy was right.

kaulkhara15 · Post #33 » by **kaulkhara15** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:52 am

Don't think anyone has mentioned this, but props to Crosby for keeping us in the game in the first half. That 50+ yarder was huge.

El Duderino · Post #34 » by **El Duderino** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 2:00 am

WiscoKing13 wrote:I saw a few different thing on twitter that boykin was benched for Adams. Anyone know why? Also TE who?

Bostick was active for the game, saw him on special teams, so i wonder why he didn't play on offense?

As for the game, Geno Smith has really improved, thankfully his WR core sucks, especially after Dekker got hurt.

That was a hugeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee comeback. Lose that game at home going 0-2 and facing two division road games, the season could have been near on the brink next week in Detroit.

To me, the game was won in the last two minutes of the first half. Jets are driving after the botched onside kick with the chance to go up either 24-9 or 28-9 and Daniels pressure forced the Tramon INT, instead we got a TD to make it 21-16. That's either a 10 or 14 point swing.

El Duderino · Post #35 » by **El Duderino** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 2:11 am

rilamann wrote:

Yeah I wasn't and I'm still not a fan of not retaining James Jones,that game against Seattle was a game right off that bat in which we really missed not having a guy like him.

But if Adams can make some plays and grow up quickly as you said it will be one of those hindsight moves where you say yeah Teddy was right.

IMO we miss Finley way more than James Jones. The last two weeks there have been numerous times where Rodgers had a lot of time to throw, but nobody has been open. I think one sizable factor why is defenses simply have no fear at all of our tight ends making big plays up the seam, so their safeties are focusing almost entirely on our receivers.

For all of Finley's faults, defensive coordinators needed to at least pay attention to where he was at all times. Maybe if Bostick can eventually starting making some big plays, defenses will have to focus on him. So far though, our tight ends have done almost nothing in the passing games and defensive coordinators clearly will notice this.

Godgers · Post #36 » by **Godgers** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 2:58 am

So what is the correct info on the defense. Did we play a 4-3 in the second half?

Mags FTW · Post #37 » by **Mags FTW** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:02 am

Adams>Boykin

Better stay with that.

HKPackFan · Post #38 » by **HKPackFan** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:10 am

Mags FTW wrote:Adams>Boykin

Better stay with that.

Adams showed some spark. I liked him.

But we really need a TE to step up. Quarless doesn't inspire much excitement. I'm hoping Bostick and Rodgers can grow up fast.

Post #39 » by **humanrefutation** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:30 am

Jones looked pretty good for Oakland today.

WiscoKing13 · Post #40 » by **WiscoKing13** » Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:37 am

humanrefutation wrote:Jones looked pretty good for Oakland today.

didn't he fumble twice in one play?

Sent from my SCH-I545 using RealGM Forums mobile app