JayMKE wrote:I thought we should of drafted Vernon Davis
then, now, forever
Haloti Ngata for me.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
JayMKE wrote:I thought we should of drafted Vernon Davis
then, now, forever
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
HKPackFan wrote:PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
Whenever I see this play, I"m sorry but I just see Davon House lazily giving Jon Ryan an angle and setting up this play. WTF House. If Only Bush was on that side...ugh.
Buckrageous wrote:HKPackFan wrote:PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
Whenever I see this play, I"m sorry but I just see Davon House lazily giving Jon Ryan an angle and setting up this play. WTF House. If Only Bush was on that side...ugh.
I see that play and it just makes me pissed at Hawk. House would of run him down before he ran for the 1st down. All Hawk had to do was cover an OT. He breaks for the sideline, why? Apparently he thought Ryan was going to outrun House and get the 1st. I remember him always being hyped as a smart player, assignment sure, etc. Not on that play.
HKPackFan wrote:Buckrageous wrote:HKPackFan wrote:
Whenever I see this play, I"m sorry but I just see Davon House lazily giving Jon Ryan an angle and setting up this play. WTF House. If Only Bush was on that side...ugh.
I see that play and it just makes me pissed at Hawk. House would of run him down before he ran for the 1st down. All Hawk had to do was cover an OT. He breaks for the sideline, why? Apparently he thought Ryan was going to outrun House and get the 1st. I remember him always being hyped as a smart player, assignment sure, etc. Not on that play.
So much fail on that play. House was not supposed to pressure the kick, the play call was protection, not to block the kick. House wasn't following instructions, all he had to do was take 2 steps outside and cover the lane. He already has Brad Jones running on the same side like a madman crashing down, one of you idiots needs to play contain. F@cking bunch of morons. Hawk somehow thinks Jon Ryan is going to run 10+ yards and get a first down or run 20 yards and score a TD!?! Did everyone lose their goddamn mind on that play!?! F@cking pathetic.
HKPackFan wrote:PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
Whenever I see this play, I"m sorry but I just see Davon House lazily giving Jon Ryan an angle and setting up this play. WTF House. If Only Bush was on that side...ugh.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
rilamann wrote:HKPackFan wrote:PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
Whenever I see this play, I"m sorry but I just see Davon House lazily giving Jon Ryan an angle and setting up this play. WTF House. If Only Bush was on that side...ugh.
House could have played it better but that play still doesn't work if Hawk doesn't go brain-dead.No way does Ryan out-run House for the first down.If Hawk doesn't pull a Bostic and does what I'm assuming (you never know with Slocum I guess) he was told and what he was supposed to do,a punter and back-up offensive linemen don't play backyard catch on us for a touchdown in the NFC Championship game.
Even for the sake of argument if we want to argue Ryan out-runs House for the first down the play still doesn't result in a Seahawks touchdown if Hawk does what he was supposed to do,it just results in a first down.
What Hawk did on that play is every bit as unforgivable as what Bostic did on the onside kick.
Good riddance Hawk.
PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
This one always kills me. Like what even?
The Green Bay Packers appear bound and determined to improve at inside linebacker with different players next season.
Nevertheless, it would be incorrect to think that A.J. Hawk is totally out of the picture.
A source familiar with the situation said the team left the door open for his possible return after releasing him Feb. 25.
Probably the only scenario for a return by Hawk would be if the Packers weren't satisfied with their depth at inside linebacker in early May after veteran free agency, the draft and college free agency.
Hawk, 31, intends to play at least another season. He underwent ankle surgery in early February for an injury that apparently affected him for a significant portion of the season. However, he wasn't listed on the injury report all season.
The Packers are counting $1.6 million against their salary cap for Hawk. His minimum base salary as a nine-year veteran would be $870,000.
"You could probably squeeze another year out of A.J. as a starter," an executive in personnel for an NFC team said last week. "He's probably not what he once was. I don't see the third-down nickel value in him anymore."
MickeyDavis wrote:The Green Bay Packers appear bound and determined to improve at inside linebacker with different players next season.
Nevertheless, it would be incorrect to think that A.J. Hawk is totally out of the picture.
A source familiar with the situation said the team left the door open for his possible return after releasing him Feb. 25.
Probably the only scenario for a return by Hawk would be if the Packers weren't satisfied with their depth at inside linebacker in early May after veteran free agency, the draft and college free agency.
Hawk, 31, intends to play at least another season. He underwent ankle surgery in early February for an injury that apparently affected him for a significant portion of the season. However, he wasn't listed on the injury report all season.
The Packers are counting $1.6 million against their salary cap for Hawk. His minimum base salary as a nine-year veteran would be $870,000.
"You could probably squeeze another year out of A.J. as a starter," an executive in personnel for an NFC team said last week. "He's probably not what he once was. I don't see the third-down nickel value in him anymore."
Thunder Muscle wrote:Hawk should be happy to go back to Ohio.
JayMKE wrote:I thought we should of drafted Vernon Davis
then, now, forever