ImageImage

Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 34,567
And1: 4,172
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#761 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Jan 8, 2024 5:32 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:I can't say I even agreed with all of MVP's takes from earlier in the year, but dude has been out fighting the fight and posting mountains of data all year while weathering a mountain of criticism and garbage takes from a 4-5 week stretch where some people were all but ready to bury him before he even had a full 17-games under his belt. As someone who still greatly values the eye test when it comes to NFL Quarterback evaluation, I've started to appreciate more of these advanced metrics that attempt to quantify a lot of the stuff that doesn't show up on the stat sheet, and how useless things like completion % and Passer Rating have become.


The eye test always produced two conflicting impressions. From the start, Love was always extremely composed in the pocket, and wasn't making stupid decisions. He looked the part of very good NFL quarterback. The problem was the accuracy on throws over 10 yards. They looked terrible. Overthrows, under throws, throws that were 10 yards off the receiver.

I think is going to be one of those outliers. i.e. a situation where a player made a massive turn, of a magnitude that doesn't have a ton of precedent. There was an NBA player that we'd talk about on the Bucks board that also did this, but I can't recall the name. Just know that about a decade ago, if you criticized any rookie or young player, the response would be "But "x" turned into All-NBA late in his career, so you can't think Joe Alexander won't do the same"


Josh Allen is always exhibit A of, "everything but the accuracy" and then accuracy comes around. In-season is wild for Love, though.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 60,971
And1: 26,097
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#762 » by paulpressey25 » Mon Jan 8, 2024 6:51 pm

Kerb Hohl wrote:
Josh Allen is always exhibit A of, "everything but the accuracy" and then accuracy comes around. In-season is wild for Love, though.


Next we have to sort out the receivers (and Kraft). On what other team do all these great receivers suddenly emerge as rookies? Seems too good to be true. Hopefully this all carries over to next season.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 22,533
And1: 23,708
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#763 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Jan 8, 2024 7:15 pm

What's there to work out? Reed and Wicks are absolute studs, and things might have worked out perfectly with Doubs being more of your "James Jones", sometimes #2, sometimes #3 dude. Really the only thing they need to figure out is if Watson is ever gonna be a guy you can rely on to stay healthy. Having two awesome receiving TE's is never a bad problem to have.
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 33,648
And1: 9,686
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#764 » by MikeIsGood » Mon Jan 8, 2024 7:40 pm

Don't think I agree on overall sentiment, but just to answer the question...

paulpressey25 wrote:I think is going to be one of those outliers. i.e. a situation where a player made a massive turn, of a magnitude that doesn't have a ton of precedent. There was an NBA player that we'd talk about on the Bucks board that also did this, but I can't recall the name. Just know that about a decade ago, if you criticized any rookie or young player, the response would be "But "x" turned into All-NBA late in his career, so you can't think Joe Alexander won't do the same"


Jermaine O'Neal.
jute2003
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,803
And1: 2,329
Joined: Feb 20, 2013
     

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#765 » by jute2003 » Mon Jan 8, 2024 7:42 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:I can't say I even agreed with all of MVP's takes from earlier in the year, but dude has been out fighting the fight and posting mountains of data all year while weathering a mountain of criticism and garbage takes from a 4-5 week stretch where some people were all but ready to bury him before he even had a full 17-games under his belt. As someone who still greatly values the eye test when it comes to NFL Quarterback evaluation, I've started to appreciate more of these advanced metrics that attempt to quantify a lot of the stuff that doesn't show up on the stat sheet, and how useless things like completion % and Passer Rating have become.


The eye test always produced two conflicting impressions. From the start, Love was always extremely composed in the pocket, and wasn't making stupid decisions. He looked the part of very good NFL quarterback. The problem was the accuracy on throws over 10 yards. They looked terrible. Overthrows, under throws, throws that were 10 yards off the receiver.

I think is going to be one of those outliers. i.e. a situation where a player made a massive turn, of a magnitude that doesn't have a ton of precedent. There was an NBA player that we'd talk about on the Bucks board that also did this, but I can't recall the name. Just know that about a decade ago, if you criticized any rookie or young player, the response would be "But "x" turned into All-NBA late in his career, so you can't think Joe Alexander won't do the same"
Love had his own issues early but there was so many **** routes and just plain wrong routes being run by his baby recievers and he had no running game to speak of to take pressure off. The line also ranged from inconsistent to outright poop the first half of the season. It was damn near impossible to make any sort of judgment on his passes without knowing where everyone was actually supposed to be.
only a fan, only an opinion
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 23,874
And1: 19,675
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#766 » by WeekapaugGroove » Mon Jan 8, 2024 7:57 pm

jute2003 wrote:
paulpressey25 wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:I can't say I even agreed with all of MVP's takes from earlier in the year, but dude has been out fighting the fight and posting mountains of data all year while weathering a mountain of criticism and garbage takes from a 4-5 week stretch where some people were all but ready to bury him before he even had a full 17-games under his belt. As someone who still greatly values the eye test when it comes to NFL Quarterback evaluation, I've started to appreciate more of these advanced metrics that attempt to quantify a lot of the stuff that doesn't show up on the stat sheet, and how useless things like completion % and Passer Rating have become.


The eye test always produced two conflicting impressions. From the start, Love was always extremely composed in the pocket, and wasn't making stupid decisions. He looked the part of very good NFL quarterback. The problem was the accuracy on throws over 10 yards. They looked terrible. Overthrows, under throws, throws that were 10 yards off the receiver.

I think is going to be one of those outliers. i.e. a situation where a player made a massive turn, of a magnitude that doesn't have a ton of precedent. There was an NBA player that we'd talk about on the Bucks board that also did this, but I can't recall the name. Just know that about a decade ago, if you criticized any rookie or young player, the response would be "But "x" turned into All-NBA late in his career, so you can't think Joe Alexander won't do the same"
Love had his own issues early but there was so many **** routes and just plain wrong routes being run by his baby recievers and he had no running game to speak of to take pressure off. The line also ranged from inconsistent to outright poop the first half of the season. It was damn near impossible to make any sort of judgment on his passes without knowing where everyone was actually supposed to be.
I thought MLF called straight up scared games where he didn't seem to trust anyone on the O for a time this season. Way too many forced runs and dink and dunk BS.

But it's revisionist history to blame all loves struggles on this. He did just flat out miss his spot too often. He was much better over the last 9 games (except for the NY game where he played like he took mushrooms).

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 60,971
And1: 26,097
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#767 » by paulpressey25 » Mon Jan 8, 2024 8:24 pm

MikeIsGood wrote:
Jermaine O'Neal.


Thank you! I knew we had that outlier from back in the day.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 38,450
And1: 10,034
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#768 » by midranger » Mon Jan 8, 2024 8:31 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
MikeIsGood wrote:
Jermaine O'Neal.


Thank you! I knew we had that outlier from back in the day.

Yup. JON and Steve Nash were the classic examples. Zach Randolph to a lesser extent.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 60,971
And1: 26,097
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#769 » by paulpressey25 » Mon Jan 8, 2024 8:41 pm

midranger wrote:Yup. JON and Steve Nash were the classic examples. Zach Randolph to a lesser extent.


"I'm telling you, we can't give up on Marcus Haislip. Look at what JO has done with the Pacers after being in the league five years"
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 58,027
And1: 13,780
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#770 » by Ayt » Mon Jan 8, 2024 9:40 pm

Crazy, MVP caliber play from Love over the final 8 games.

Image
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 22,895
And1: 9,379
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#771 » by M-C-G » Mon Jan 8, 2024 10:02 pm

Ayt wrote:Crazy, MVP caliber play from Love over the final 8 games.

Image

But we traded up for him. A fourth! A Fourth!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 23,874
And1: 19,675
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#772 » by WeekapaugGroove » Mon Jan 8, 2024 10:10 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
midranger wrote:Yup. JON and Steve Nash were the classic examples. Zach Randolph to a lesser extent.


"I'm telling you, we can't give up on Marcus Haislip. Look at what JO has done with the Pacers after being in the league five years"
JO is kind of a fun Love comp because they both sat longer than usual because of vets ahead of them.

They are also both cases where you can argue sitting was good for them or it simply delayed them being good. Since you can't go back and play out the opposite scenaro whichever side you fall on you can argue it and never be proven wrong :)

Like I'm an anti sitting multiple years guy (1 year is fine for some guys and was probably very important in 2020 with a messed up camp) so I can point to Love playing better this year the more he played and use that as an argument he should have played sooner. But someone can argue the opposite and no one will ever know who's right.

Truths probably somewhere in the middle but what fun is that optinion on a message board.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 60,971
And1: 26,097
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#773 » by paulpressey25 » Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:23 am

Read on Twitter
?s=61&t=7x9MgP9Kcm4BOX840mYHGQ
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 18,895
And1: 8,634
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#774 » by LikeABosh » Wed Jan 10, 2024 11:23 am

paulpressey25 wrote:
Kerb Hohl wrote:
Josh Allen is always exhibit A of, "everything but the accuracy" and then accuracy comes around. In-season is wild for Love, though.


Next we have to sort out the receivers (and Kraft). On what other team do all these great receivers suddenly emerge as rookies? Seems too good to be true. Hopefully this all carries over to next season.


I was thinking the same thing. It's bizarre to have this many young contributors. Like 2 go out and the 2 that come in don't miss a beat. And it's happened over and over again down to guys like Malik Heath and Bo Melton lol

I do think Reed is the real deal at least
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,847
And1: 3,070
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#775 » by MVP2110 » Wed Jan 10, 2024 5:04 pm

Read on Twitter
?t=6el03hZ-NP25uWNq6yGk3g&s=19
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,295
And1: 6,242
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#776 » by LUKE23 » Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:19 pm

Really good discussion this morning on Wilde & Tauscher about the obsession of trying to build a contender while a QB is on a rookie contract. The main point was that so few QB are ready from day 1 to walk into an organization and turn it into a winning one without development. And additionally, there are many cases where throwing guys out there too early ruined their career and/or sent the organization another direction within a couple years. Bears are likely going to have to move onto young QB #3 in seven seasons.

I fully believe had they thrown Love out in year 1 or year 2 he would have been a disaster, and then who knows where we end up. Obviously, team situation factors in, as does coaching, but it sure seems like the Packers have it down. Will it be more challenging once Love extends? Yes. But the way we hammer the draft and have a high hit percentage, we can definitely do it.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 22,533
And1: 23,708
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#777 » by Ron Swanson » Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:34 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Really good discussion this morning on Wilde & Tauscher about the obsession of trying to build a contender while a QB is on a rookie contract. The main point was that so few QB are ready from day 1 to walk into an organization and turn it into a winning one without development. And additionally, there are many cases where throwing guys out there too early ruined their career and/or sent the organization another direction within a couple years. Bears are likely going to have to move onto young QB #3 in seven seasons.

I fully believe had they thrown Love out in year 1 or year 2 he would have been a disaster, and then who knows where we end up. Obviously, team situation factors in, as does coaching, but it sure seems like the Packers have it down. Will it be more challenging once Love extends? Yes. But the way we hammer the draft and have a high hit percentage, we can definitely do it.


Louder for the people in the back aka a large segment of this board that did nothing but use this absurd narrative as a means to label it a dumb pick cuz "Something something timelines". On an organizational level, you couldn't ask for a better outcome than this. If the arrow keeps pointing up, our "rough transition period" between eras was basically one 8-9 season of mediocre football. Pretty incredible.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 23,874
And1: 19,675
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#778 » by WeekapaugGroove » Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:28 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:Really good discussion this morning on Wilde & Tauscher about the obsession of trying to build a contender while a QB is on a rookie contract. The main point was that so few QB are ready from day 1 to walk into an organization and turn it into a winning one without development. And additionally, there are many cases where throwing guys out there too early ruined their career and/or sent the organization another direction within a couple years. Bears are likely going to have to move onto young QB #3 in seven seasons.

I fully believe had they thrown Love out in year 1 or year 2 he would have been a disaster, and then who knows where we end up. Obviously, team situation factors in, as does coaching, but it sure seems like the Packers have it down. Will it be more challenging once Love extends? Yes. But the way we hammer the draft and have a high hit percentage, we can definitely do it.


Louder for the people in the back aka a large segment of this board that did nothing but use this absurd narrative as a means to label it a dumb pick cuz "Something something timelines". On an organizational level, you couldn't ask for a better outcome than this. If the arrow keeps pointing up, our "rough transition period" between eras was basically one 8-9 season of mediocre football. Pretty incredible.
Did it hurt CJ Stoud to play this year? Also Love sure seemed to get better the more he you know actually played football this year. For all we know if he starts earlier maybe he wins an MVP already and the Packers are SB favorites.

Now I will conceded that very specific for Love and 2020 I think that would have been a particularly hard year to start from day 1 although Burrow has been pretty damn good so maybe I'm overstating even that aspect.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 92,890
And1: 45,518
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#779 » by MickeyDavis » Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:33 pm

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,135
And1: 4,171
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train 

Post#780 » by RRyder823 » Wed Jan 10, 2024 11:41 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:Really good discussion this morning on Wilde & Tauscher about the obsession of trying to build a contender while a QB is on a rookie contract. The main point was that so few QB are ready from day 1 to walk into an organization and turn it into a winning one without development. And additionally, there are many cases where throwing guys out there too early ruined their career and/or sent the organization another direction within a couple years. Bears are likely going to have to move onto young QB #3 in seven seasons.

I fully believe had they thrown Love out in year 1 or year 2 he would have been a disaster, and then who knows where we end up. Obviously, team situation factors in, as does coaching, but it sure seems like the Packers have it down. Will it be more challenging once Love extends? Yes. But the way we hammer the draft and have a high hit percentage, we can definitely do it.


Louder for the people in the back aka a large segment of this board that did nothing but use this absurd narrative as a means to label it a dumb pick cuz "Something something timelines". On an organizational level, you couldn't ask for a better outcome than this. If the arrow keeps pointing up, our "rough transition period" between eras was basically one 8-9 season of mediocre football. Pretty incredible.
Did it hurt CJ Stoud to play this year? Also Love sure seemed to get better the more he you know actually played football this year. For all we know if he starts earlier maybe he wins an MVP already and the Packers are SB favorites.

Now I will conceded that very specific for Love and 2020 I think that would have been a particularly hard year to start from day 1 although Burrow has been pretty damn good so maybe I'm overstating even that aspect.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
For every Stroud there's about 4 Fields that aren't given a chance to gain confidence in a system and/or rework theit mechanics.

I'll flat out say had Rodgers been thrown to the fire he never becomes MVP Rodgers and when you look at Love I see much of the same.

When your building up mechanics in a player and they're forced to play the moment they get pressed many end up reverting back to the original way they did things and it can make the gains made in practice irrelevant if they haven't become second nature to them yet. We see that in Love with how his foot work has a habit of going to hell and reverting back to his college ways in certain situations.

Some players can work through these issues while playing. That's undeniable. It also shouldn't be denied there's a ton of QBs that have been absolutely ruined and discarded because they were forced into playing before they should have

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app

Return to Green Bay Packers