DrugBust wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
You must be worried as hell about the Bears, then. They've got no NFL quality RB and Rex Grossman.
Very worried.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
DrugBust wrote:eagle13 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Last year you were wildly positive at 11-5 / 10-6
and now this year - THAT conservative?
OK. May I ask why 6-10?
Last year I thought we could go 11-5 or 10-6 not because of how good we were, but how bad our opponents were. This season I think our schedule is just much tougher:
I think we win at home against:
Detroit
Minnesota
Washington
Carolina
Oakland
I think on the road we'll beat:
Either Detroit or Minnesota but not both.
and that's it.
Our other road games are against:
Chicago
Dallas
New York
St. Louis
Denver
Kansas City
That's **** brutal. If neither squad is missing any key pieces (like KC missing Johnson or the Rams missing Jackson), I don't see us winning a game against those teams because they're simply a lot better.
eagle13 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
A couple of those teams that are supposed to be good will suck. Have no idea which ones. Just happens every year in the NFL. Either injuries, chemistry gone wrong, age or a batch of bad gatorade.
El Duderino wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Yep
And who knows if a team we think should suck will end up being good.Happens every year where some teams look to have a tough schedule that ends up not being as tough or what looks a weak schedule ends up being tougher than expected.