ImageImage

OT: Pacman Jones is suspended for a year

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,932
And1: 35,186
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

OT: Pacman Jones is suspended for a year 

Post#1 » by ReasonablySober » Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:15 pm

:o

The guy hasn't even been convicted of anything yet. The union has to appeal this and I think they'll have all the grounds in the world to do so.

Don't get me wrong; I think he's a scumbag.

But I don't know how there's any way the NFL can justify this within the spectrum of the CBA. I know they have this new Personal Conduct stipulation, but how can they make this decision retroactively?
User avatar
Neusch23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,250
And1: 59
Joined: Jul 04, 2005
Location: Green Bay
     

 

Post#2 » by Neusch23 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:34 pm

there has to be a point when enough is enough.

Everyone appeals, generally.

I expect Pacman to do the same.

One guy can make an whole league look bad, and he seems to not care at all about his employer, so the man dropped the hammer on him.

Good for the NFL, now if baseball would only wake up.
skitch815
Starter
Posts: 2,496
And1: 59
Joined: Oct 19, 2005
     

 

Post#3 » by skitch815 » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:46 am

It kind of amazes me how people seem to be thinking that this is some recent development. Like suddenly the league is going to hell in a handbasket. This kind of behavior has been going on for as long as I can remember. Why all of a sudden is there such a huge cry to do something about it?
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

Re: OT: Pacman Jones is suspended for a year 

Post#4 » by Nowak008 » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:58 am

DrugBust wrote::o

The guy hasn't even been convicted of anything yet. The union has to appeal this and I think they'll have all the grounds in the world to do so.

Don't get me wrong; I think he's a scumbag.

But I don't know how there's any way the NFL can justify this within the spectrum of the CBA. I know they have this new Personal Conduct stipulation, but how can they make this decision retroactively?



Thats what I was wondering about. Ex post facto much? Even though the union is behind this it seems that there is no way an appeal wouldn't win. Seems very unamerican if u ask me.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,144
And1: 9,340
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
         

 

Post#5 » by DelaneyRudd » Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:05 am

The sky is not falling. Out of 53 x 32 people the number getting in trouble is still low. In my opinion the NFL needs to take a strictly business like position towards it. If a player is hurting the leagues bottom line they have the right to take professional action. The NFL is selling a product and if someone causes sales to go down they should be fired. The ability to be rehired is above and beyond what the league should be expected to do. This isn't a stars league like the NBA. This is a teams league and if someone doesn't want to do their job someone else will.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,547
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

 

Post#6 » by El Duderino » Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:31 pm

I heard Mortonsen on ESPN say something like 80% of the players were fine with the suspensions because they were tired of trouble makers giving all the players a bad rap.
BuckPack
Starter
Posts: 2,205
And1: 802
Joined: May 05, 2006
Location: NY

 

Post#7 » by BuckPack » Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:48 pm

This is his 10th altercation with Police since WVU. 10th!!! Hell with our legal system, that is "american." what he did in LV was ridiculous.

good riddance. don't let the door hit you on the way out Pacman. maybe if you get your act together you can come back in a year.
User avatar
DigitalFool
Veteran
Posts: 2,557
And1: 141
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

 

Post#8 » by DigitalFool » Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:52 pm

Anybody catch the USA Today sports cover? They have pictures of like 20 some players with 'issues' in the NFL - I think it's hilarious that they put a picture of Cory Rodgers and put Packers underneath...KROB I understand, but Rodgers?

Return to Green Bay Packers