Solved our PF problem for sure
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
Solved our PF problem for sure
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 16
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 31, 2010
Solved our PF problem for sure
Tell me what you guys think
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=24ofv2o
Indiana: They do it because they cut costs with Ford and they gain the PF they need for the future. They save money this way and can resign Thompson and dont have to worry about over spending on Horford even though i think he would be worth it.
Houston: They do it to get Melo of course and they also add a point guard since they lose brooks. Ford is also an expiring so yea.
Denver: They do it because they arent going to get Melo back so they have to take what they can get. They also finally get Foster whom they been wanting for awhile.
Sacramento: They do it because there seems like there isnt any room for Thompson anymore so they add in vertern leadership in Mike. They also add in a former teammate of Cousin in Patterson.
There could also be a couple draft picks going places but this is my trade idea
then we do this trade and have evans sit the whole year to help mentor our young players.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=2fw3vf4
Our roster would be
Collison/Stephenson/Price
Rush/George/Stepheson
Granger/Posey/Battier
Thompson/Hansbrough/Rolle
Hibbert/Thompson
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=24ofv2o
Indiana: They do it because they cut costs with Ford and they gain the PF they need for the future. They save money this way and can resign Thompson and dont have to worry about over spending on Horford even though i think he would be worth it.
Houston: They do it to get Melo of course and they also add a point guard since they lose brooks. Ford is also an expiring so yea.
Denver: They do it because they arent going to get Melo back so they have to take what they can get. They also finally get Foster whom they been wanting for awhile.
Sacramento: They do it because there seems like there isnt any room for Thompson anymore so they add in vertern leadership in Mike. They also add in a former teammate of Cousin in Patterson.
There could also be a couple draft picks going places but this is my trade idea
then we do this trade and have evans sit the whole year to help mentor our young players.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=2fw3vf4
Our roster would be
Collison/Stephenson/Price
Rush/George/Stepheson
Granger/Posey/Battier
Thompson/Hansbrough/Rolle
Hibbert/Thompson
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 470
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 31, 2009
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
what? i dont get it. on the trade machine it have dahantay and mcroberts for maurice evans. im confused.
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,317
- And1: 13,523
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
-
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
Piecing this alleged offer from your lineup, it looks to be Dunleavy/Ford/Foster/Solo for Battier & Jason Thompson? With a follow up trade of Dahntay and McRoberts for Mo Evans?
Houston does some sort of Brooks/Patterson/Battier for Melo?
Sacramento does some sort of Thompson for Dunleavy/Patterson?
Denver does Melo for Brooks/Foster?
Hard to tell. What's the 1st trade?
Houston does some sort of Brooks/Patterson/Battier for Melo?
Sacramento does some sort of Thompson for Dunleavy/Patterson?
Denver does Melo for Brooks/Foster?
Hard to tell. What's the 1st trade?
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 16
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 31, 2010
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
my bad guys i thought i had it on there
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=24ofv2o
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=24ofv2o
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
- DougInOz
- Junior
- Posts: 372
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 04, 2009
- Location: Canberra, Aus
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
Would Denver really want Foster if they are going into a reload if not a full rebuild? I thought they only wanted him as 'final piece' type of thing to help in deep playoff runs against LA...
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 16
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 31, 2010
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
hmm if so then they could just use him as an expiering then i guess
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,317
- And1: 13,523
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
-
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
Could you post the trade here, anybody?
I'm just getting a loading screen on the ESPN trade machine link for the 4 team deal.
This is why we ask that you always type out the trade in the thread, and not just link it. Link it to show that it works financially, but type out the deal too.
I'm just getting a loading screen on the ESPN trade machine link for the 4 team deal.
This is why we ask that you always type out the trade in the thread, and not just link it. Link it to show that it works financially, but type out the deal too.
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 16
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 31, 2010
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
IND gets Thompson, Battier
IND sends Ford, Dunleavy, Foster
HOU gets Ford, Anthony, Future 2nd Rounder(IND)
HOU sends: Brooks, Budinger, Martin, Battier, Patterson
SAC gets Dunleavy, Patterson
SAC sends Thompson
DEN gets Brooks, Budinger, Martin, Foster
DEN sends: Anthony
there is the trade.
IND sends Ford, Dunleavy, Foster
HOU gets Ford, Anthony, Future 2nd Rounder(IND)
HOU sends: Brooks, Budinger, Martin, Battier, Patterson
SAC gets Dunleavy, Patterson
SAC sends Thompson
DEN gets Brooks, Budinger, Martin, Foster
DEN sends: Anthony
there is the trade.
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,748
- And1: 618
- Joined: May 19, 2008
-
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
We get WAY too good of a deal, and Sacramento gets totally screwed. Nice try though. I would love to see Thompson at the PF position, but the only possible way to get him is giving up next years 1st Rounder AND probably Paul George.
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
- longfellow44
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,931
- And1: 171
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
Honestly If you guys were able to pull this crap off your GM would be the obvious choice for Exec of the year. Yeah over riley. Because the amount of raping your team would have done over the summer would be insanely ridiculous.
If this went down The pacers would have used more lube than any team I have ever seen. The lube being for the raping.
If this went down The pacers would have used more lube than any team I have ever seen. The lube being for the raping.
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,347
- And1: 176
- Joined: Jun 20, 2004
- Location: Sacramento, Ca
-
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
I locked the version on the Kings board. I think the proper mod thing to do would be to lock it down here, too.
KANGZZZZZ!
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,467
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 10, 2010
- Contact:
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
ICMTM wrote:I locked the version on the Kings board. I think the proper mod thing to do would be to lock it down here, too.
thank you lol Owen Wilson and Vince Vaughn FTW!!!
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
- Gremz
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 36,278
- And1: 6,143
- Joined: Jun 25, 2006
- Location: I am a Norwegian Fisherman
- Contact:
-
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,596
- And1: 283
- Joined: Jun 24, 2005
- Location: Location: Location:
Re: Solved our PF problem for sure
We need to bring the trade thread back for this next season anyways.