OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
Moderator: nykgeneralmanager
OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
- cshoops
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 977
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jun 17, 2008
- Contact:
OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
Would anyone consider that?
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,836
- And1: 122
- Joined: Aug 01, 2002
- Location: jersey city,nj
- Contact:
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
Portis is much more injury prone than the current RBs the Giants currently have. Haynesworth, I don't think he is worth the money he is being paid. He is the best player at his position when healthy but the guy cant even give 16 games a season.
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
- Knick Swisher
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,151
- And1: 334
- Joined: Jun 08, 2009
- Location: Brooklyn
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
- Knick_Fury
- Junior
- Posts: 409
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 12, 2010
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
thatdude wrote:
^This.
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 332
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 13, 2010
- Location: Lincoln, NE for School. Dallas, TX when not in school.
- Contact:
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
no. Haynesworth has an awful contract and is not the type of player needed in the locker room. Portis isn't very enticing either.
XBOX 360 GT: DinnerBlaster27
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
- Knicks since 94
- Sophomore
- Posts: 103
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 25, 2010
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
Would be a stupid trade on our part....
"Prokhorov promised a title by 2016, but the way the Nets are going now, they’ll be fortunate to win a playoff series over that time."
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
- Tony Montana
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,937
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 08, 2001
- Location: Jersey
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
Would be a stupid trade on the Redskins part too. Why would the Skins want Osi?
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,534
- And1: 9,990
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
- Location: laser shield bitches
Re: OSi For Portis, Haynesworth ?
It would put us in the Superbowl. Haynesworth is still a dominant player while Osi is coming off the worst season of his career and at his age may never fully recover. Plus we already have Kiwi ready to step in and JPP in the pipeline. Fat Al would make our DL much better than Osi does even though he'll miss a few games a year. He wouldn't be a problem in our locker-room either because Washington would eat all of his guaranteed money so we could cut him at no cost at any time if he's too big of a problem. Haynesworth and Canty would be a a duo to rival the Williams wall and with Joseph and Alford we'd have tremendous depth. Our run D would go from our biggest concern to a dominant strength.
Portis is pretty useless to us so I wouldn't really want him but AH is a monster even at 85%. I general hate guys who are lazy and so under-achieve, but Fat Al is dominant even when he's being lazy. Plus we'd rotate him to keep him fresh, healthy and motivated. This trade would make our D elite to go with our very strong passing game.
Portis is pretty useless to us so I wouldn't really want him but AH is a monster even at 85%. I general hate guys who are lazy and so under-achieve, but Fat Al is dominant even when he's being lazy. Plus we'd rotate him to keep him fresh, healthy and motivated. This trade would make our D elite to go with our very strong passing game.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!