Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
Moderators: CalamityX12, MHSL82
Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
- clyde21
- RealGM
- Posts: 61,713
- And1: 69,197
- Joined: Aug 20, 2014
Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
So, have people changed their minds yet? There was a substantial topic on Poopla about this, and most sided with Patton.
Our top 4 WRs heading into the year should be Crabs, Boldin, Johnson and Ellington.
Our top 4 WRs heading into the year should be Crabs, Boldin, Johnson and Ellington.
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Senior
- Posts: 524
- And1: 28
- Joined: Aug 20, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
I wouldn't go that far yet.
Patton looked just as good as Ellington has last years preseason if not better.
I really like both guys moving forward. Patton unfortunately had some injury issues last year and has had the likes of gabbert overthrowing him this year a lot.
It will be interesting to see who gets what playing time today.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM(previously h0ckeysk83r)
Patton looked just as good as Ellington has last years preseason if not better.
I really like both guys moving forward. Patton unfortunately had some injury issues last year and has had the likes of gabbert overthrowing him this year a lot.
It will be interesting to see who gets what playing time today.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM(previously h0ckeysk83r)
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,460
- And1: 15
- Joined: Aug 18, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
Ellington is going to be a player for years. The kid is going to be one of those pesky WR that pisses of the defense. Extremely happy we drafted him.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,171
- And1: 66
- Joined: Aug 22, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
49rangER wrote:I wouldn't go that far yet.
Patton looked just as good as Ellington has last years preseason if not better.
I really like both guys moving forward. Patton unfortunately had some injury issues last year and has had the likes of gabbert overthrowing him this year a lot.
It will be interesting to see who gets what playing time today.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM(previously h0ckeysk83r)
He looked far better! I have no idea why we're using Ellington like he's the only option on offense when the second string gets in. I would have loved to have seen AJ(in his rookie year) or Patton get so many opportunities to make plays. Ellington still catches the ball with his body and he's a small target, not sure if his game can be successful against starters.
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,164
- And1: 817
- Joined: Mar 04, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
I still like Patton. I hate comparing players when they are playing against 2nd and 3rd team players. I want to see Patton and Ellington with Kaepernick against the 1st string DB's and that will tell you who is better. Just the glimpses toward the end of the season from Patton I will give him the edge. But Ellington looks like he could be a good player also in the right system and I don't see that system being with Harbaugh and Roman. When have we had a speedy back/receiver that was successful?
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,555
- And1: 339
- Joined: Aug 18, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
Is it just me or does it seem like Patton has a lot of minor foot problems?
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 15,815
- And1: 2,532
- Joined: Mar 15, 2012
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
I'm fine with Ellington being better(never partake in who better vs who) however it wouldn't matter if Kap/Roman/Harb are not using him effectively.
My WRs ATM are Crabs, Boldin, Stevie(not impressing = concerning IMO), Ellington, Patton n Osgood(STs)
My WRs ATM are Crabs, Boldin, Stevie(not impressing = concerning IMO), Ellington, Patton n Osgood(STs)
The ModFather
My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 13
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
Ellington has looked great so for this preseason. Whether it's Ellington>Patton or vice versa, they should both be integral parts of our offense for years to come. I just hope the coaching staff can figure out how to use Ellington's skill set. They have struggled using players like him to their potential.
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Senior
- Posts: 542
- And1: 21
- Joined: Aug 21, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
To me Ellington will be a slot receiver who can handle being moved outside, and Patton is the reverse. Both have the speed and versatility that Jenkins couldn't bring to the table. I think Ellington will be a consistent playmaker. Patton will be serviceable #3 type receiver who can make an occasional big play to spark the offense. We'll see how this plays out but I have the feeling Patton will be inactive a lot of weeks given what's ahead of him.
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 13
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
Ease_Ur_Storm wrote:To me Ellington will be a slot receiver who can handle being moved outside, and Patton is the reverse. Both have the speed and versatility that Jenkins couldn't bring to the table. I think Ellington will be a consistent playmaker. Patton will be serviceable #3 type receiver who can make an occasional big play to spark the offense. We'll see how this plays out but I have the feeling Patton will be inactive a lot of weeks given what's ahead of him.
Patton has that cocky/confident/swag about him that I love. Unless Stevie is showing something more in practice that what we've seen in the games I'd rather see Patton with the opportunity.
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,171
- And1: 66
- Joined: Aug 22, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
Ease_Ur_Storm wrote:To me Ellington will be a slot receiver who can handle being moved outside, and Patton is the reverse. Both have the speed and versatility that Jenkins couldn't bring to the table. I think Ellington will be a consistent playmaker. Patton will be serviceable #3 type receiver who can make an occasional big play to spark the offense. We'll see how this plays out but I have the feeling Patton will be inactive a lot of weeks given what's ahead of him.
Do you believe Patton couldn't do the same if featured with the 2nd sting offense?
I think his whole 1st down celebration was about not getting any plays drawn up for him
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
- clyde21
- RealGM
- Posts: 61,713
- And1: 69,197
- Joined: Aug 20, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
I_am_1z wrote:Ease_Ur_Storm wrote:To me Ellington will be a slot receiver who can handle being moved outside, and Patton is the reverse. Both have the speed and versatility that Jenkins couldn't bring to the table. I think Ellington will be a consistent playmaker. Patton will be serviceable #3 type receiver who can make an occasional big play to spark the offense. We'll see how this plays out but I have the feeling Patton will be inactive a lot of weeks given what's ahead of him.
Do you believe Patton couldn't do the same if featured with the 2nd sting offense?
I think his whole 1st down celebration was about not getting any plays drawn up for him
So you think the coaches are going out of their way to give the ball to Ellington and not Patton?
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Senior
- Posts: 542
- And1: 21
- Joined: Aug 21, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
Patton could definitely make big plays against no. 2's. He's already shown glimpses of his big play ability in real games. Will definitely be interesting to see how this plays out with Stevie because I think Kap has confidence in Patton.
He'll make a great highlight reel catch, but he'll also do things like not help his QB out on one of Gabbert's interception. It may be an awareness thing with him sometimes because he plays with so much intensity.
Both Ellington and Patton should be able to take advantage of #3 CB's. Hopefully we can actually do something with that this year and keep the sticks moving. If Kap and Stevie can't get on the same page, I'm fine with elevating both these guys.
He'll make a great highlight reel catch, but he'll also do things like not help his QB out on one of Gabbert's interception. It may be an awareness thing with him sometimes because he plays with so much intensity.
Both Ellington and Patton should be able to take advantage of #3 CB's. Hopefully we can actually do something with that this year and keep the sticks moving. If Kap and Stevie can't get on the same page, I'm fine with elevating both these guys.
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 235
- And1: 13
- Joined: Aug 22, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
Ease_Ur_Storm wrote:Patton could definitely make big plays against no. 2's. He's already shown glimpses of his big play ability in real games. Will definitely be interesting to see how this plays out with Stevie because I think Kap has confidence in Patton.
He'll make a great highlight reel catch, but he'll also do things like not help his QB out on one of Gabbert's interception. It may be an awareness thing with him sometimes because he plays with so much intensity.
Both Ellington and Patton should be able to take advantage of #3 CB's. Hopefully we can actually do something with that this year and keep the sticks moving. If Kap and Stevie can't get on the same page, I'm fine with elevating both these guys.
I hope this isn't in reference to the interception on the seam route last week. That ball was so poorly thrown there was nothing Patton could do to help it out. it was thrown three yards behind him.
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,056
- And1: 259
- Joined: Aug 24, 2014
Re: Bruce Ellington > Quentin Patton
I like both but if we wind up extending Crabtree than Ellington will wind up being a bigger contributor going forward since he offers up a different skillset.
Patton's skillset is just redundant with as heavy we are on possession receivers currently.
Patton's skillset is just redundant with as heavy we are on possession receivers currently.