49er and Denver Trade Proposal

gbolden62 · Post #1 » by **gbolden62** » Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:22 am

Since the 49ers and Broncos seem to have a problem with there Receivers ( Crabtree and Marshall ) the 49ers should offer the rights to crabtree plus a 2nd or 3rd rounder in next years draft and offer the talented marshall 5 years 35 million, which IMO marshall would take in a heart beat due to the fact that it would be a major increase in pay, plus he needs a change of sceanory and IMO the Niners are a better team and fit for marshall.

GS Warriors 1 · Post #2 » by **GS Warriors 1** » Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:53 pm

No thanks.

Marshall is one more off the field incident away from missing half the season and that price is way too much to give up for a bigger problem.

Bac2Basics · Post #3 » by **Bac2Basics** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 4:33 am

The last thing a young rebuilding team needs is to trade for a malcontent.

Zyme · Post #4 » by **Zyme** » Tue Sep 1, 2009 11:11 pm

um...ew

Ya lets go with no. Throw in that nice 1st rounder you got in 2011 and you'd have a deal.

still lol at you trading your 1st this year to sea (if I'm not mistaken)

GS Warriors 1 · Post #5 » by **GS Warriors 1** » Wed Sep 2, 2009 2:16 am

Denver traded their 2010 first to Seattle.

49ers got a 2010 1st from Carolina.

darkadun · Post #6 » by **darkadun** » Wed Sep 2, 2009 4:03 am

No way does it work IMO. While Crabtee is irritating me by not signing, Marhsall is a menace, no freaking joke. I've read alot about whats going on in Denver since thats where I'm from, and he is not worth the trouble.

Besides, we have bigger issues to worry about. We need to improve our OL and QB situation first.

Commodor · Post #7 » by **Commodor** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:48 am

If the niner's were desperate for a wr like that it would be more sensible to do a similar deal but for Boldin. A little more mature and definetly a better reciever. I agree though. Lets work the OL and DL and a QB if Hill can't do it