ImageImageImageImageImage

Blake Griffin to Re-Sign with Clippers for $173M over 5 years

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

Roscoe Sheed
RealGM
Posts: 11,314
And1: 5,232
Joined: May 01, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#21 » by Roscoe Sheed » Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:32 pm

UKClipperfan wrote:Not good. Was holding out hope that both would resign with Melo added to the mix. Don't think one leaving one staying would signal full rebuild tho, but a step back to maintain cap flexibility for free agency 2018.

We don't know what will happen until it happens. It is still possible both will stick around
User avatar
Ranma
RealGM
Posts: 14,456
And1: 4,062
Joined: Jun 13, 2011
Location: OC, CA
Contact:
       

Gray in Black-and-White Print 

Post#22 » by Ranma » Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:43 pm

Green_teamer wrote:He broke a trade a couple days ago


I'm not familiar with Schultz but there may be some gray areas of his reporting instead of referring to it as strictly being a black-and-white issue with him only either being a reputable journalist or a complete hack. For instance, I distinctly remember Peter Vecsey breaking the Clippers' trade of Antonio McDyess during the 1995 draft since I was in disbelief of the deal at the time. Vecsey was maybe a step up from Stephen A. Smith or Chris Broussard as a journalist.

Again, I don't know enough about Jordan Schultz to make a call one way or the other, but just because a guy breaks news sometimes doesn't necessarily make him a respected journalist. Even TMZ and the National Inquirer hit on some of their stories. You cited Mitch Lawrence's tweet in the "Chris Paul Opts Out" thread piggy-backing off of the Zach Lowe article I cited, but it certainly doesn't make Lawrence any more credible given his questionable reputation.
LA Legends: Kershaw & Koufax_ Image _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
User avatar
Ranma
RealGM
Posts: 14,456
And1: 4,062
Joined: Jun 13, 2011
Location: OC, CA
Contact:
       

Life Without Griffin 

Post#23 » by Ranma » Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:29 am

LOT AT STAKE FOR CLIPS WITH PAUL, GRIFFIN

Things could look mighty different for the Clippers next season with Chris Paul and Blake Griffin becoming free agents. Playing without just Griffin hasn't been too much of an issue over the years for LA, but life without both looks as if it would be devastating.


Image
LA Legends: Kershaw & Koufax_ Image _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
User avatar
TucsonClip
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,535
And1: 950
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
Contact:
 

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#24 » by TucsonClip » Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:50 am

Green_teamer wrote:
TucsonClip wrote:
Green_teamer wrote:
Read on Twitter


Word of advise, take anything this guys says with a grain of salt. I know for a fact he takes stories that get floated around that most other media outlets/reporters wont take, because they know its garbage info.


He broke a trade a couple days ago


Thats fine, like I said; grain of salt. I know for a fact what I posted is 100% true.
Plus, why would I want to go to the NBA? Duke players suck in the pros.

- Shane Battier
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,094
And1: 4,831
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Life Without Griffin 

Post#25 » by esqtvd » Sun Jun 25, 2017 3:12 am

Ranma wrote:LOT AT STAKE FOR CLIPS WITH PAUL, GRIFFIN

Things could look mighty different for the Clippers next season with Chris Paul and Blake Griffin becoming free agents. Playing without just Griffin hasn't been too much of an issue over the years for LA, but life without both looks as if it would be devastating.


Image


Game, set, match, Ranma. Nice to see you again. And all those here gathered who are friends from other boards. :D

To business:

With KD at GSW--taking less money to keep the band together--we can no longer fool ourselves we're just a smidge away.

Blake has some fun and productive years ahead of him elsewhere. Boston has been my pick, but Ainge has been quite risk-averse and he can see what everyone sees--

Image

An eagle at the moment, but by 2020 more likely than not, just another max contract turkey. Blake's been hacked up just not the past 2 years, but in Vinnie's last playoff too, making it 3 out of 5.

Look out below.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
Ranma
RealGM
Posts: 14,456
And1: 4,062
Joined: Jun 13, 2011
Location: OC, CA
Contact:
       

Welcome Aboard, Matey 

Post#26 » by Ranma » Sun Jun 25, 2017 3:20 am

esqtvd wrote:Game, set, match, Ranma. Nice to see you again. And all those here gathered who are friends from other boards. :D


Hey, esqtvd. It's nice to see that you've made your way here. I hope that means we'll be seeing more of you around these parts. Welcome and thanks for that bit of statistical analysis. :-D
LA Legends: Kershaw & Koufax_ Image _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
User avatar
PerkinsFor3
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,989
And1: 2,065
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Contact:

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#27 » by PerkinsFor3 » Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:31 pm

IF Blake leaves, do you think we'll see Brice get a chance to play?
Roscoe Sheed
RealGM
Posts: 11,314
And1: 5,232
Joined: May 01, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#28 » by Roscoe Sheed » Sun Jun 25, 2017 3:04 pm

PerkinsFor3 wrote:IF Blake leaves, do you think we'll see Brice get a chance to play?

Yes because Doc might not have much of a choice. I think he will become a rotation player off the bench even if Griffin re-signs
User avatar
PerkinsFor3
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,989
And1: 2,065
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Contact:

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#29 » by PerkinsFor3 » Sun Jun 25, 2017 4:22 pm

I did not watch any D-League gammes he played in last year - did he play there? Any thoughts on his development? He had all the tools when coming out of college...maybe bit of a throwback pf, but talented. Any progress/more rannge?
Roscoe Sheed
RealGM
Posts: 11,314
And1: 5,232
Joined: May 01, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#30 » by Roscoe Sheed » Sun Jun 25, 2017 4:27 pm

PerkinsFor3 wrote:I did not watch any D-League gammes he played in last year - did he play there? Any thoughts on his development? He had all the tools when coming out of college...maybe bit of a throwback pf, but talented. Any progress/more rannge?

He did play and showed some skills. He can shoot out to 20 feet and has good length. I think the coaches were frustrated with his defensive lapses though
User avatar
PerkinsFor3
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,989
And1: 2,065
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Contact:

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#31 » by PerkinsFor3 » Sun Jun 25, 2017 4:31 pm

20 ft is already improvement from college iirc. Probably some of the main focus down there. He's always been somewhat 'unfocused' on defense it seems, and I doubt that'll ever improve. Thanks Roscoe.
UKClipperfan
Junior
Posts: 355
And1: 182
Joined: Mar 09, 2014
 

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#32 » by UKClipperfan » Mon Jun 26, 2017 12:13 am

Roscoe Sheed wrote:
UKClipperfan wrote:Not good. Was holding out hope that both would resign with Melo added to the mix. Don't think one leaving one staying would signal full rebuild tho, but a step back to maintain cap flexibility for free agency 2018.

We don't know what will happen until it happens. It is still possible both will stick around


I don't see it at this point. Its definitely not beef, but Blake and CP probably just see what observers see in that they don't mesh all that well together on the court. We can still offer that 5 year super max, so one of them should stick around. Head says CP, heart says Blake.
User avatar
Ranma
RealGM
Posts: 14,456
And1: 4,062
Joined: Jun 13, 2011
Location: OC, CA
Contact:
       

Like Anybody Asked Stephen A. Smith for His Opinion 

Post#33 » by Ranma » Mon Jun 26, 2017 1:55 am

LA Legends: Kershaw & Koufax_ Image _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
Clemenza
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,951
And1: 5,100
Joined: Jan 21, 2013
Location: California
   

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#34 » by Clemenza » Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:24 am

PerkinsFor3 wrote:I did not watch any D-League gammes he played in last year - did he play there? Any thoughts on his development? He had all the tools when coming out of college...maybe bit of a throwback pf, but talented. Any progress/more rannge?


He did play but they only played in the Orlando Summer League tourny and its hard to watch the teams play or the action on the floor cause they play in a very small cramped gym and the tv camera angle is absolutely horrible. Its really hard to gauge anything in the Orlando Summer League. We'll be back in the bigger one, The Las Vegas Summer League, this year and we'll see what's what.. All the games are played at Thomas & Mack and the Cox Pavilion. Much easier on the eyes
User avatar
Ranma
RealGM
Posts: 14,456
And1: 4,062
Joined: Jun 13, 2011
Location: OC, CA
Contact:
       

5th-Year Option and Suitors 

Post#35 » by Ranma » Mon Jun 26, 2017 10:10 am

Broderick Turner, Los Angeles Times (6/23/17)
If Griffin re-signs with the Clippers, he can earn more from them than any other team, getting about $175 million over five years.

He would start at $30 million in the first year with the Clippers, $32 million in the second, $35 million in the third, $37 million in the fourth and $39 million in the last.

If Griffin decides to bolt and sign with another team, he would get less money, earning about $130 million over four years.

He would get $30 million in the first year, $31 million in second, $33 million in the third and $34 million in the fourth.

The fifth year and extra cash that the Clippers can give both players gives L.A. a big advantage with Paul and Griffin.
...

Griffin also is expected to have several teams vying for his services.

The Boston Celtics, Houston Rockets and perhaps even his hometown team of Oklahoma City will be after Griffin.

Chris Paul and Blake Griffin Both Opt Out of Contracts with Clippers to Become Free Agents
LA Legends: Kershaw & Koufax_ Image _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
User avatar
Ranma
RealGM
Posts: 14,456
And1: 4,062
Joined: Jun 13, 2011
Location: OC, CA
Contact:
       

No Soup for Griffin 

Post#36 » by Ranma » Tue Jun 27, 2017 4:08 am

Kevin O' Connor, TheRinger.com (6/26/17)
Then there’s Griffin. The sense I’ve gotten over the past month from chatting with agents and front-office executives is that it would be shocking if the Clippers offered Griffin the full five-year max contract, valued around $170 million. The Clippers’ caution would be understandable. Griffin has been hampered by an endless list of injuries over his career. Offering all that guaranteed money would be a monumental investment carrying tremendous risk. If the Clippers don’t go to five years, the door opens for teams willing to offer the four-year max, which is worth roughly $128 million. Teams could be even more comfortable offering Griffin a max deal with options for the third or fourth season, or a four-year deal at a value lower than the max. Griffin will have to choose between lifestyle, long-term security, or a winning situation — or some combination of the three — in a place like Miami or Boston. The bottom line is that it’s not a certainty that Griffin returns to the Clippers. Lob City could officially die.
...

Alternatively, Boston could skip the Hayward sweepstakes and instead focus on a potentially lower-cost option like Griffin. The Celtics were hot for Blake in the past. They had casual conversations with the Clippers going back to at least the 2016 deadline, per multiple league sources. The Vertical’s Adrian Wojnarowski said the Celtics are the team that’s “really the danger” to pry Griffin away from the Clippers.

If teams are hesitant to offer Griffin the full max, or even a four-year deal, the Celtics could always offer Griffin more years at less than the max. Griffin is a better player than Hayward in virtually every category other than 3-point shooting. He’d solve Boston’s major rebounding issues, while also providing a playmaking presence that Brad Stevens could unlock.

The best ability is availability, but Griffin has more upside than any other player that’ll be available this offseason. Higher variance carries greater risk and greater potential reward. To beat the Warriors, teams will need to gamble.

Paul George, Blake Griffin, and More Unanswered NBA Questions
LA Legends: Kershaw & Koufax_ Image _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
User avatar
Ranma
RealGM
Posts: 14,456
And1: 4,062
Joined: Jun 13, 2011
Location: OC, CA
Contact:
       

ESPN Cap Analysis 

Post#37 » by Ranma » Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:58 am

Ranma wrote:Justin J. Page, ESPN Stats & Info (6/27/17)
If Griffin returns and Paul leaves

A similar situation would occur should Griffin return and Paul leave, as LA would be left with just $5.5 million in salary cap space. Again, the Clippers would likely operate as an over-the-cap team and would be able to offer an outside free agent a starting salary of $8.4 million.

If both Paul and Griffin leave

Should both Paul and Griffin leave, the Clippers would have about $34.4 million in salary cap space.

Simplifying Clippers' Convoluted Cap Situation
LA Legends: Kershaw & Koufax_ Image _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,707
And1: 17,778
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#38 » by MartinToVaught » Tue Jun 27, 2017 2:28 pm

Read on Twitter


Blake is one of the best passers, 6-foot-9 or taller, in NBA history. He is one of six current players his height to have a season with an assist rate higher than 25 percent, and one of only 13 players to ever do it. There have just not been many basketball players with his combination of size, speed, and ballhandling and passing ability before, and the best way to utilize him is to have him be the player throwing alley-oops, not catching them. Not only would using Blake as a point guard make him a better player, it would give his team more flexibility when it comes to the types of lineups he could be used in and the players he could be put around.

Using Griffin as a point forward would allow his team to forgo a traditional point guard, creating room in the lineup for another multi-positional defender who could stretch the defense as a spot-up shooter, while still keeping a rim-protecting 5 on the floor next to him.


Interesting idea. Too bad Doc is too stubborn and conservative to ever try it - and CP3's control-freak mentality is too entrenched for him to ever trust a teammate to run the show.
Image
User avatar
donemilio21
Analyst
Posts: 3,120
And1: 845
Joined: Aug 20, 2009
Location: Santa Barbara
   

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#39 » by donemilio21 » Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:34 pm

MartinToVaught wrote:
Read on Twitter


Blake is one of the best passers, 6-foot-9 or taller, in NBA history. He is one of six current players his height to have a season with an assist rate higher than 25 percent, and one of only 13 players to ever do it. There have just not been many basketball players with his combination of size, speed, and ballhandling and passing ability before, and the best way to utilize him is to have him be the player throwing alley-oops, not catching them. Not only would using Blake as a point guard make him a better player, it would give his team more flexibility when it comes to the types of lineups he could be used in and the players he could be put around.

Using Griffin as a point forward would allow his team to forgo a traditional point guard, creating room in the lineup for another multi-positional defender who could stretch the defense as a spot-up shooter, while still keeping a rim-protecting 5 on the floor next to him.


Interesting idea. Too bad Doc is too stubborn and conservative to ever try it - and CP3's control-freak mentality is too entrenched for him to ever trust a teammate to run the show.



He is actually pretty bad dribbling the ball. Excellent passer, great vision and he can be a playmaker, but as soon as he starts dribbling against any smaller defender, he will lose the ball. I have seen this over and over again, so much that on many occasions I predicted he'd commit a turnover as soon as he started dribbling because of his match-up. While he has improved significantly, he is not able to guard players who are quicker than him.
As much as I love Blake, and enjoy watching him, we should look into keeping Paul and doping a S&T for Blake, preferably to a team in the East.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: The Future of Blake Griffin 

Post#40 » by nickhx2 » Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:52 pm

i don't see why some people seem to love lighting assets on fire as much as doc rivers does.

s/t blake means little to no return value on him. signing him to a long term deal then trading him at the deadline/offseason = max return for him.

the former hurts the clippers and the latter helps them. end of story.

Return to Los Angeles Clippers