Doc Rivers not taking any responsibility for crapping the bed.

kylem4711 · Post #21 » by **kylem4711** » Tue May 19, 2015 4:23 pm

rayofsunshine wrote:Who did you guys get for Bledsoe?

it was bledsoe and caron butler for dudley and redick.

so after all the chips fell, it was:

Caron Butler, Bledsoe, and a 1st round pick for Redick. :upset:

rayofsunshine · Post #22 » by **rayofsunshine** » Tue May 19, 2015 5:35 pm

Damn, was Caron sucking that bad? Because if not, seems like he could fetch Redick alone. I asked because I liked Bledsoe, but maybe he wanted to leave.

nickhx2 · Post #23 » by **nickhx2** » Tue May 19, 2015 5:48 pm

caron was on his last legs. the redick trade was really just a S/T so he could get here for the price he was asking for. really the trade was about moving bledsoe for dudley. bad on many fronts.

Post #24 » by **QRich3** » Wed May 20, 2015 10:51 am

nickhx2 wrote:caron was on his last legs. the redick trade was really just a S/T so he could get here for the price he was asking for. really the trade was about moving bledsoe for dudley. bad on many fronts.

I've said it quite a few times in here already, but no, that's not how it worked. You either got someone to take Butler's contract in a three team trade or Redick would sign with the T-Wolves. And for someone to take Butler's deal you'd have to include Bledsoe as an incentive. Getting Dudley out of it was not a bad deal really.

Quake Griffin · Post #25 » by **Quake Griffin** » Wed May 20, 2015 2:12 pm

If Doc just let Dudley stick around for this season, he erases like half of his bad moves.
Trying to get rid of him sent him down the rabbit hole and crap signing after crap decision after crap decision.

Quake Griffin · Post #26 » by **Quake Griffin** » Wed May 20, 2015 2:13 pm

and competitive people don't take responsibility for things…well, not outwardly. They don't feel like they owe it to you or me or the media and they don't.

you guys ever see Aaron Rodgers say, "my bad" or "that was my fault" after a game? HE NEVER does and it used to bug me out.

I have no doubt he's aware of his short comings and that he hears all of his criticism.

Luciferswings · Post #27 » by **Luciferswings** » Fri May 22, 2015 9:37 am

Everyone is in agreement. Doc needs a real GM who, at the very least, is sharing powers with him 50-50. He can focus on the stuff Doc doesn't care about, and isn't good at, and frankly doesn't even have time for.

mj_shoefanatic · Post #28 » by **mj_shoefanatic** » Fri May 22, 2015 9:17 pm

rayofsunshine wrote:Who did you guys get for Bledsoe?

Redick & Dudley :curse:

ghostowl · Post #29 » by **ghostowl** » Mon May 25, 2015 7:51 pm

mj_shoefanatic wrote:
rayofsunshine wrote:Who did you guys get for Bledsoe?

Redick & Dudley

lmaoooooooo

Quake Griffin · Post #30 » by **Quake Griffin** » Mon May 25, 2015 10:00 pm

I don't think Redick and Dudley would have been a bad haul if Doc listened to Dudley and didn't run him and his fractured knee into the ground.

nickhx2 · Post #31 » by **nickhx2** » Mon May 25, 2015 10:43 pm

i think it would have been looked at as a great move, actually.

cause we'd be in the WCF right now, possibly the favorites. and we'd have actual wing depth and whatever we traded that first-rounder for (avery bradley? wilson chandler?)

Post #32 » by **og15** » Thu May 28, 2015 5:03 am

Quake Griffin wrote:I don't think Redick and Dudley would have been a bad haul if Doc listened to Dudley and didn't run him and his fractured knee into the ground.

This is true, not to mention that it would probably have saved the team a draft pick and given some depth at SF this season, but then again, the front office didn't know about the hard cap, so maybe not.

TucsonClip · Post #33 » by **TucsonClip** » Thu May 28, 2015 8:23 pm

Dudley was a good addition in thought, but was never given the opportunity to play at 100%.

50CalClips · Post #34 » by **50CalClips** » Sun Jan 5, 2020 7:47 pm

This thread from 2015 --

esqtvd · Post #35 » by **esqtvd** » Sun Jan 5, 2020 10:18 pm

50CalClips wrote:This thread from 2015 --

proving that this board used to be even more infantile than it is now :lol:

well I feel much better

Personal attacks against fellow board members (calling people infantile) is not allowed

Post #36 » by **og15** » Mon Jan 6, 2020 7:10 pm

Please don't necro old threads that aren't directly relevant to any current discussion, thanks

Roach Clip · Post #37 » by **Roach Clip** » Mon Jan 6, 2020 9:59 pm

og15 wrote:Please don't necro old threads that aren't directly relevant to any current discussion, thanks

Does anyone else find this thread pretty relevant?

50CalClips · Post #38 » by **50CalClips** » Mon Jan 6, 2020 11:03 pm

Roach Clip wrote:
og15 wrote:Please don't necro old threads that aren't directly relevant to any current discussion, thanks

Does anyone else find this thread pretty relevant?

The RealGM Search Feature exists for a reason.

nickhx2 · Post #39 » by **nickhx2** » Mon Jan 6, 2020 11:09 pm

the original thread is about doc shirking responsibility and coming up with excuses on how he capped the championship equity of a very strong team with his consistently misguided personnel moves. years ago.

much different from anything going on now. so no, not relevant.

esqtvd · Post #40 » by **esqtvd** » Mon Jan 6, 2020 11:42 pm

the thread title is infantile

this board is better now and hopefully the moderation is too