ImageImageImageImage

Dak thread

Moderator: Texas Chuck

User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 28,143
And1: 14,463
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#61 » by Cactus Jack » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:04 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:No offense, but even if we fill all the holes we have, we still have Elliott, Prescott and McCarthy coming back. Best outcome I see is another first round loss when the playoffs start. No way we get to the promised land with Dak. I've seen enough. Dak is not even a top 8 QB despite being paid top 3 or 4 in the money dept. No faith in him at all.

They're kind of stuck with Dak now. Looks like they have an out in 2025. But they should have dealt him last year before signing him to that extension. They could have gotten a haul of picks back. Drafted a QB & gone that route. It's nearly impossible to win now with a QB taking up such a large percentage of the cap. How it goes.

Same with Zeke. Stuck with that loser to for another year. I wanted to get rid of that bum 2 years ago. As a matter of fact, if you go back to past draft threads you will see I didn't even want to draft him that night. I remember me and Mr. b wanting totally someone else.

IIRC Jalen Ramsey was in that draft. DeForest Buckner as well.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 16,549
And1: 3,325
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#62 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:09 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:They're kind of stuck with Dak now. Looks like they have an out in 2025. But they should have dealt him last year before signing him to that extension. They could have gotten a haul of picks back. Drafted a QB & gone that route. It's nearly impossible to win now with a QB taking up such a large percentage of the cap. How it goes.

Same with Zeke. Stuck with that loser to for another year. I wanted to get rid of that bum 2 years ago. As a matter of fact, if you go back to past draft threads you will see I didn't even want to draft him that night. I remember me and Mr. b wanting totally someone else.

IIRC Jalen Ramsey was in that draft. DeForest Buckner as well.

I'm not positive, but maybe Mr. b can remember that far back but I remember both those names being brought up. I really wanted a DT and I think I was high on Buckner. I think Mr. b wanted Ramsey. I screamed for a DT for about 5 years in a row back then.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 14,354
And1: 4,043
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#63 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:09 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:No offense, but even if we fill all the holes we have, we still have Elliott, Prescott and McCarthy coming back. Best outcome I see is another first round loss when the playoffs start. No way we get to the promised land with Dak. I've seen enough. Dak is not even a top 8 QB despite being paid top 3 or 4 in the money dept. No faith in him at all.

They're kind of stuck with Dak now. Looks like they have an out in 2025. But they should have dealt him last year before signing him to that extension. They could have gotten a haul of picks back. Drafted a QB & gone that route. It's nearly impossible to win now with a QB taking up such a large percentage of the cap. How it goes.

You have to have exceptional drafting to have any chance of overcoming an albatross contract. On the bright side the Cowboys have done fairly well drafting and we are still expected to see a huge jump in the cap, although not this season.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 14,354
And1: 4,043
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#64 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:10 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:No offense, but even if we fill all the holes we have, we still have Elliott, Prescott and McCarthy coming back. Best outcome I see is another first round loss when the playoffs start. No way we get to the promised land with Dak. I've seen enough. Dak is not even a top 8 QB despite being paid top 3 or 4 in the money dept. No faith in him at all.

They're kind of stuck with Dak now. Looks like they have an out in 2025. But they should have dealt him last year before signing him to that extension. They could have gotten a haul of picks back. Drafted a QB & gone that route. It's nearly impossible to win now with a QB taking up such a large percentage of the cap. How it goes.

Same with Zeke. Stuck with that loser to for another year. I wanted to get rid of that bum 2 years ago. As a matter of fact, if you go back to past draft threads you will see I didn't even want to draft him that night. I remember me and Mr. b wanting totally someone else.

They should have never given him that contract. 1 more season then they can cut him.
User avatar
Otis Driftwood
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,498
And1: 1,975
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Contact:
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#65 » by Otis Driftwood » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:10 pm

Adios, La’el Collins.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 14,354
And1: 4,043
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#66 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:11 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:They're kind of stuck with Dak now. Looks like they have an out in 2025. But they should have dealt him last year before signing him to that extension. They could have gotten a haul of picks back. Drafted a QB & gone that route. It's nearly impossible to win now with a QB taking up such a large percentage of the cap. How it goes.

Same with Zeke. Stuck with that loser to for another year. I wanted to get rid of that bum 2 years ago. As a matter of fact, if you go back to past draft threads you will see I didn't even want to draft him that night. I remember me and Mr. b wanting totally someone else.

IIRC Jalen Ramsey was in that draft. DeForest Buckner as well.

In hindsight Ramsey should have been the pick.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 28,143
And1: 14,463
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#67 » by Cactus Jack » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:11 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Same with Zeke. Stuck with that loser to for another year. I wanted to get rid of that bum 2 years ago. As a matter of fact, if you go back to past draft threads you will see I didn't even want to draft him that night. I remember me and Mr. b wanting totally someone else.

IIRC Jalen Ramsey was in that draft. DeForest Buckner as well.

I'm not positive, but maybe Mr. b can remember that far back but I remember both those names being brought up. I really wanted a DT and I think I was high on Buckner. I think Mr. b wanted Ramsey. I screamed for a DT for about 5 years in a row back then.

They should have went with Ramsey. Never take a RB that high. Dallas had a good enough oline. That you could have plugged anyone in & been fine. Ramsey would have been a huge difference maker on defense.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 16,549
And1: 3,325
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#68 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:13 pm

Mr B wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:No offense, but even if we fill all the holes we have, we still have Elliott, Prescott and McCarthy coming back. Best outcome I see is another first round loss when the playoffs start. No way we get to the promised land with Dak. I've seen enough. Dak is not even a top 8 QB despite being paid top 3 or 4 in the money dept. No faith in him at all.

They're kind of stuck with Dak now. Looks like they have an out in 2025. But they should have dealt him last year before signing him to that extension. They could have gotten a haul of picks back. Drafted a QB & gone that route. It's nearly impossible to win now with a QB taking up such a large percentage of the cap. How it goes.

You have to have exceptional drafting to have any chance of overcoming an albatross contract. On the bright side the Cowboys have done fairly well drafting and we are still expected to see a huge jump in the cap, although not this season.

Don't forget the albatross contract we are currently in and gave Elliott a few years ago. What a slap in the face contract that turned out to be as it bites us in the ass for another year.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 14,354
And1: 4,043
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#69 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:13 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Same with Zeke. Stuck with that loser to for another year. I wanted to get rid of that bum 2 years ago. As a matter of fact, if you go back to past draft threads you will see I didn't even want to draft him that night. I remember me and Mr. b wanting totally someone else.

IIRC Jalen Ramsey was in that draft. DeForest Buckner as well.

I'm not positive, but maybe Mr. b can remember that far back but I remember both those names being brought up. I really wanted a DT and I think I was high on Buckner. I think Mr. b wanted Ramsey. I screamed for a DT for about 5 years in a row back then.

Initially I wanted Ramsey or Buckner. I changed my mind to Zeke though. His big play potential was too good to pass up and he delivered his first couple of seasons. That’s why he was able to get that contract. With his playing style though they should have never given him that second contract.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 14,354
And1: 4,043
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#70 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:15 pm

Otis Driftwood wrote:Adios, La’el Collins.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

What are they going to do with $35M in cap space? I think if they were going to pay Bobby Wagner they would have done so already. And luckily they’re not the ones that didn’t give Von Miller that contract. Who else is out there?
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 14,354
And1: 4,043
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#71 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:17 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:They're kind of stuck with Dak now. Looks like they have an out in 2025. But they should have dealt him last year before signing him to that extension. They could have gotten a haul of picks back. Drafted a QB & gone that route. It's nearly impossible to win now with a QB taking up such a large percentage of the cap. How it goes.

You have to have exceptional drafting to have any chance of overcoming an albatross contract. On the bright side the Cowboys have done fairly well drafting and we are still expected to see a huge jump in the cap, although not this season.

Don't forget the albatross contract we are currently in and gave Elliott a few years ago. What a slap in the face contract that turned out to be as it bites us in the ass for another year.

Well cap wise it’s actually not hurting them considering they current have $35M in cap space. He’s hurting them on the field because he’s a shell of what he was as a rookie and he’s preventing Pollard from getting more touches.
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 16,549
And1: 3,325
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#72 » by bluejerseyjinx » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:18 pm

Mr B wrote:
Otis Driftwood wrote:Adios, La’el Collins.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

What are they going to do with $35M in cap space? I think if they were going to pay Bobby Wagner they would have done so already. And luckily they’re not the ones that didn’t give Von Miller that contract. Who else is out there?

At least with Gregory and Collins gone, we wipe out almost half of the stupid penalties we had last year ! :thumbsup:
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 28,143
And1: 14,463
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#73 » by Cactus Jack » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:37 pm

Mr B wrote:You have to have exceptional drafting to have any chance of overcoming an albatross contract. On the bright side the Cowboys have done fairly well drafting and we are still expected to see a huge jump in the cap, although not this season.

I wouldn't call it an albatross. But history says that it's very difficult to win when a QB is making top dollar. It just doesn't happen.

Dak is a top 10 QB. But at the same time unless you have an elite one (Brady, Mahomes), then you won't win regardless.

The next best option, is having a QB on a rookie deal.

The Hawks I think finally realized that they weren't going to win with Wilson. Especially when he wants to be the highest paid. They really had no choice but to move on.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
User avatar
Otis Driftwood
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,498
And1: 1,975
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Contact:
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#74 » by Otis Driftwood » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:40 pm

Mr B wrote:
Otis Driftwood wrote:Adios, La’el Collins.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

What are they going to do with $35M in cap space? I think if they were going to pay Bobby Wagner they would have done so already. And luckily they’re not the ones that didn’t give Von Miller that contract. Who else is out there?

Good question… but the truth of the matter is that Steele did well in replacing him and has earned the job. I still think they should have moved Collins back to LG but my opinion matters little to them. And that doesn’t address C which needs improvement as well not LT where we can’t count on Tyron to play 17.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 28,143
And1: 14,463
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#75 » by Cactus Jack » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:46 pm

Otis Driftwood wrote:Good question… but the truth of the matter is that Steele did well in replacing him and has earned the job. I still think they should have moved Collins back to LG but my opinion matters little to them. And that doesn’t address C which needs improvement as well not LT where we can’t count on Tyron to play 17.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Is Collins a better fit at RT or G?
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 14,354
And1: 4,043
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#76 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:16 pm

Otis Driftwood wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Otis Driftwood wrote:Adios, La’el Collins.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

What are they going to do with $35M in cap space? I think if they were going to pay Bobby Wagner they would have done so already. And luckily they’re not the ones that didn’t give Von Miller that contract. Who else is out there?

Good question… but the truth of the matter is that Steele did well in replacing him and has earned the job. I still think they should have moved Collins back to LG but my opinion matters little to them. And that doesn’t address C which needs improvement as well not LT where we can’t count on Tyron to play 17.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Worst case scenario he’s quality depth.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 14,354
And1: 4,043
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#77 » by Mr B » Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:17 pm

Now this is interesting. Wonder if Jerry is going to pull what Denver did and sneak in and steal a FA.

Read on Twitter
?s=21
User avatar
Otis Driftwood
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,498
And1: 1,975
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Contact:
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#78 » by Otis Driftwood » Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:26 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
Otis Driftwood wrote:Good question… but the truth of the matter is that Steele did well in replacing him and has earned the job. I still think they should have moved Collins back to LG but my opinion matters little to them. And that doesn’t address C which needs improvement as well not LT where we can’t count on Tyron to play 17.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Is Collins a better fit at RT or G?

Honestly… he was absolutely dominant at LG his rookie season. Then Doug Free retired and they moved him to RT. He’s been good but nowhere near what he was at LG in the eyes of this observer. And with the injuries the last couple of years, I believe putting him back inside would do wonders for him.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."
User avatar
Otis Driftwood
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,498
And1: 1,975
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Contact:
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#79 » by Otis Driftwood » Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:26 pm

Mr B wrote:Now this is interesting. Wonder if Jerry is going to pull what Denver did and sneak in and steal a FA.

Read on Twitter


You & I were thinking the exact same thing…


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 16,549
And1: 3,325
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Dak: 4 years, $160m 

Post#80 » by bluejerseyjinx » Wed Mar 30, 2022 3:00 pm

Mr B wrote:
Otis Driftwood wrote:Adios, La’el Collins.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

What are they going to do with $35M in cap space? I think if they were going to pay Bobby Wagner they would have done so already. And luckily they’re not the ones that didn’t give Von Miller that contract. Who else is out there?

Cowboys should be in a great spot to draft another stud LB in the draft. I hear they have their eyes on a couple.

Return to Dallas Cowboys