T-mac and the front office

brandonkb8 · Post #31 » by **brandonkb8** » Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:08 am

Like T Mac is really reading this post on this website rite now.lol

tayzer · Post #32 » by **tayzer** » Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:38 am

T-mac will do well in our system. Him and Kobe have chemistry from the past allstar games. Plus, we need play makers on the bench, LO is not as good as people think he is.

Flipdog69xxx · Post #33 » by **Flipdog69xxx** » Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:34 am

I really think the front office is just focusing on Fisher before anything else. But yea hopefully after we re-sign Fish we go after T-Mac. Again....DO IT MITCH!

monk302 · Post #34 » by **monk302** » Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:49 pm

We need to pass on him. TIme to get some younger legs on our squad.

High0ctane21 · Post #35 » by **High0ctane21** » Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 pm

T-Mac would be a nice guy to have off the bench to back up the 2/3 spots. Sure his legs aren't great anymore, but he can still create his shot better than most of our other players.

allstar124 · Post #36 » by **allstar124** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:29 am

DO IT MITCH.

T-MAC SAID HE WANTED TO PLAY FOR A CONTENDER, ND HE REGARDED KOBE AS THE BEST PLAYER TO EVER WEAR A LAKER UNIFORM. MCGRADY AVERAGED 10 PPG 4 APG and 4 RPG in 25 minutes. Play him 20-25 minutes a nite till he can prove himself

DubaLakers · Post #37 » by **DubaLakers** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:15 am

chefy wrote:man if comes down to fisher vs. tmac?

who would you guys choose?

Tmac is hanging by a fingernail between retirement and on an active roster. One defensive crouch and he's on the IR.

dub81 · Post #38 » by **dub81** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:21 am

Honestly I do not think TMAC's body can hold up all season. Even as a reserve getting 15 mins a game. Should of taken care of his body when he was younger.

wasted talent.

lakers16xchamps · Post #39 » by **lakers16xchamps** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:27 pm

Do it Mitch ! Mac isn't what he used to be but he's still gove you 14/15 points off the bench.

dub81 · Post #40 » by **dub81** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:28 pm

lakers16xchamps wrote:Do it Mitch ! Mac isn't what he used to be but he's still gove you 14/15 points off the bench.

TMac's body will not hold up during the regular season no matter how many minutes he played. He barely made a half of season with the Knicks playing 20 mins a game. Dude is done unfortunately.

lakers16xchamps · Post #41 » by **lakers16xchamps** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:33 pm

dub81 wrote:
lakers16xchamps wrote:Do it Mitch ! Mac isn't what he used to be but he's still gove you 14/15 points off the bench.

TMac's body will not hold up during the regular season no matter how many minutes he played. He barely made a half of season with the Knicks playing 20 mins a game. Dude is done unfortunately.

Dude he just came off surgery of course he wasn't gonna be able to play last year or play effectively, he has had a lot of time off and from what I hear has gotten back in shape.

He'll be a great addition, quit hating.

dub81 · Post #42 » by **dub81** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:36 pm

lakers16xchamps wrote:
dub81 wrote:
lakers16xchamps wrote:Do it Mitch ! Mac isn't what he used to be but he's still gove you 14/15 points off the bench.

TMac's body will not hold up during the regular season no matter how many minutes he played. He barely made a half of season with the Knicks playing 20 mins a game. Dude is done unfortunately.

Dude he just came off surgery of course he wasn't gonna be able to play last year or play effectively, he has had a lot of time off and from what I hear has gotten back in shape.

He'll be a great addition, quit hating.

Nobody is not hatting... I would love to have TMAc if he's healthy.

But the reality is he had over a year to rehab that knee in which he missed most of the season (came back in Feb). He claimed he was healthy in NY. He was clearly not. Plus he did not put up decent numbers in NY...I just don't trust his body.

Edrees · Post #43 » by **Edrees** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:20 pm

The question to the people against signing TMAC is, for 1.8 million a year, who can we sign that would help us more?

kobesmyhomie · Post #44 » by **kobesmyhomie** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:02 pm

Edrees wrote:The question to the people against signing TMAC is, for 1.8 million a year, who can we sign that would help us more?

+1

TonyMontana · Post #45 » by **TonyMontana** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:27 pm

Edrees wrote:The question to the people against signing TMAC is, for 1.8 million a year, who can we sign that would help us more?

T Mac

xkirruax · Post #46 » by **xkirruax** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:36 pm

With the scrub saga over with today maybe we will get an answer on what the Lakers think about T Mac soon

Fobbie · Post #47 » by **Fobbie** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:00 pm

After resigning Fish, do the Lakers have anything left to offer Tmac?

driver · Post #48 » by **driver** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:08 pm

They only have that 1.7 from the MLE or vet min.

holyboy2009 · Post #49 » by **holyboy2009** » Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:21 pm

Hm....T-Mac? Better snag him up before Miami does.

shaankle · Post #50 » by **shaankle** » Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:32 pm

T-mac on playing with Kobe:

(starts at 1:00)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-Ecx5v8vIo