who to sign? shannon vs. ebanks....

[popeye64821]

man f*** shannon brown.....

[96 Til Infiniti]

For the Lakers needs: Barnes > Brown > Ebanks

Though I'd say sign them both and give Ebanks time in the D-League early in the season.

[Dr Aki]

i dont mind both, even tho id prefer to see sasha eating those bench minutes at SG (seeing as its a contract year and all)

but i can def. see the advantage of having shannon; momentum changing dunks and all.

sign both, eat the lux tax.

we'll need all the versatility we can get vs. the heat

[stunnar0b]

yup we need all the players we can get to throw at wade and com.

but back to topic i think if and when we sign shannon, we will not be signing ebanks since we would already have barnes to back up walton and then overtake walton's mins once hes back starts acting up so we're staying at 13. but i could be wrong whats another mill to an already 94+ million dollar roster

sorry if its been already posted up top


update: i think we will be signing both brown and ebanks (brown 90% sure)

[brandonkb8]

i dont mind both, even tho id prefer to see sasha eating those bench minutes at SG (seeing as its a contract year and all)

but i can def. see the advantage of having shannon; momentum changing dunks and all.

sign both, eat the lux tax.

we'll need all the versatility we can get vs. the heat

( dont know how to get the clapping smileys haha)

[Venomspain]

I hope both can get roster spots if walton is either traded or retires

[DubaLakers]

Shannon can go. I love Ebanks, and Caracter would be a real nice bench post player, not sure if we'll be able to keep both. With the Barnes signing Walton, Sasha as well, Shannon can go. I don't want him back because it means one of our second rounders is gone.

[stan1981]

At least we can give Ebanks a chance. Shannon is a closed case, he had enough time to improve his game but didn't.