Los Angeles Lakers @ New York Knicks 8PM ET (TNT)

Sedale Threatt · Post #571 » by **Sedale Threatt** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:12 am

Lakers need to trade for Damian Lillard -- I think it's trending on Twitter right now -- and bring Wilt Chamberlain back from the dead.

Lost Angel · Post #572 » by **Lost Angel** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:44 am

well on the bright side if we continue this slide through the whole season and end up in the lottery, at least we keep our pick.

sigh. this is getting ridiculous

kobeaki · Post #573 » by **kobeaki** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:51 am

Anklebreaker702 wrote:
dockingsched wrote:
kobeaki wrote:Might as well have kept Bynum... I told y'all they were , at the end of the day, lateral. Except we weren't renting drew...

Yay , conventional wisdom.

ladies and gentlemen, i give you the lakers board

Lol Bynum hasnt even reported to work yet. How could this post even be made? At least wait until he reports to work Lololololololol

Have any active lakers reported to work yet?

I guess the joke is lost on you guys...

kobeaki · Post #574 » by **kobeaki** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:01 am

Gek wrote:
kobeaki wrote:Might as well have kept Bynum... I told y'all they were , at the end of the day, lateral. Except we weren't renting drew...

Yay , conventional wisdom.

I can't believe this post was made.

Really, why?

You think an emotionally (Please Use More Appropriate Word) big man with a back problem( medical science cannot fix backs, btw) who In btw, in 6 months is gonna be courted more heavily than a hooker at a porn convention...

Vs an emotionally (Please Use More Appropriate Word) big man with knee problems who at the very least we had under contract, with bad knees, yes... Much easier to fix than a back, btw.

I know you chumps all love to ball wash Dwight , because he was a very good player in a very weak east on a a very mediocre Orlando team, but, BUT... At the end of the day, despite his shot blocks about equal drew making his free throws.

I don't want Andrew back, I'm happy with Dwight, overall he isn't better than drew, and he is gonna walk. And we are left with nothing.

Ok, school is over, back to slurping Dwight and antoni...

Post #575 » by **TyCobb** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:05 am

^ How about you make a good post for once?

kobeaki · Post #576 » by **kobeaki** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:12 am

TyCobb wrote:^ How about you make a good post for once?

As soon as you become a good mod , mmkay?

Post #577 » by **TyCobb** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:12 am

Bynum is a FA after this year, along with Dwight.

But stay clueless.

kobeaki · Post #578 » by **kobeaki** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:13 am

TyCobb wrote:^ How about you make a good post for once?

Isn't this baiting , btw? Ahem ... The whole " good" mod thing...

kobeaki · Post #579 » by **kobeaki** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:15 am

TyCobb wrote:Bynum is a FA after this year, along with Dwight.

But stay clueless.

Yeah, When you learn to read , you'll see i said they are the same guy, ultimately...

But go ahead , remain illiterate.

Post #580 » by **TyCobb** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:18 am

Your ass should have been canned years ago, but I'll give you a little teaching before I give you the final boot.

"You think an emotionally (Please Use More Appropriate Word) big man with a back problem( medical science cannot fix backs, btw) who In btw, in 6 months is gonna be courted more heavily than a hooker at a porn convention...

Vs an emotionally (Please Use More Appropriate Word) big man with knee problems who at the very least we had under contract, with bad knees, yes... Much easier to fix than a back, btw."

Tell me how this makes sense.

Post #581 » by **TyCobb** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:22 am

BTW, there is no point in reporting a post of mine. I'm a mod on this board and by the looks of the comments on your profile, you will not win against me.

kobeaki · Post #582 » by **kobeaki** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:26 am

TyCobb wrote:Your ass should have been canned years ago, but I'll give you a little teaching before I give you the final boot.

"You think an emotionally (Please Use More Appropriate Word) big man with a back problem( medical science cannot fix backs, btw) who In btw, in 6 months is gonna be courted more heavily than a hooker at a porn convention...

Vs an emotionally (Please Use More Appropriate Word) big man with knee problems who at the very least we had under contract, with bad knees, yes... Much easier to fix than a back, btw."

Tell me how this makes sense.

Whatever, like you weren't any less chippy before you got yr moderation gig. Do what you will.

Post #583 » by **TyCobb** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:30 am

Perhaps you shouldn't be so aggressive in how you discuss basketball topics? Calling people chumps and referencing slurping of male genitalia isn't a very productive way of communicating.

kobeaki · Post #584 » by **kobeaki** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:31 am

TyCobb wrote:BTW, there is no point in reporting a post of mine. I'm a mod on this board and by the looks of the comments on your profile, you will not win against me.

So you admit that this is just a power trip. Good . If you will " win" so easily, then leave these posts up.

Post #585 » by **TyCobb** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:34 am

Power trip huh? How many times have I ever warned you or suspended you? Stop being paranoid and just make better posts.

kobeaki · Post #586 » by **kobeaki** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:34 am

TyCobb wrote:Perhaps you shouldn't be so aggressive in how you discuss basketball topics? Calling people chumps and referencing slurping of male genitalia isn't a very productive way of communicating.

Neither is discrediting someone's opinion, or viewpoint, I don't see you riding the moral high horse against those that tried to insult my initial point...

Neither is insulting a poster as a mod, saying I have never had a good post.

Yes, I came off as combative , but I meant it tongue in cheek... Doesn't always come through that way, but you used to come off that way to way back when, didn't you?

kobeaki · Post #587 » by **kobeaki** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:37 am

TyCobb wrote:Power trip huh? How many times have I ever warned you or suspended you? Stop being paranoid and just make better posts.

It's a deal, but you guys need to more proactive and neutral in how you police this place.

Yes , I do come across as aggressive. I don't always mean to.

Imadogg · Post #588 » by **Imadogg** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:41 am

Kobe System wrote:
MSG wrote:I want to beat these bitches by double digits. They are already on a long losing streak,let's blow them out and make their life even worse.

Any win would be great but blowing them out would be something special.

Quick Kick wrote:this gonna be a blowout on national TV. LA is demoralized and searching for answers. Your rotations have to be crisp if you plan to slow down our three point barrage, and we all know Asstoni only practices D for half an hour. Plus Ty OWNS D12 in the paint.

Asstoni will probably jizz himself watching Novak rain down threes all night.

AggO wrote:well blow them out by 30

lakers are a horrible matchup against us

LINWAGON wrote:Dwight can't hit free throws. We got this easy.

Quick Kick wrote: LA is one of the worst defensive teams in the league and their bench is non-existent. We will slaughter them. Quote me.

BKAY wrote:LA just doesnt have enough guards to hold us down for an entire game, this SHOULD be an easy W.

Just entered the thread, hope no one quoted that yet!

Post #589 » by **TyCobb** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:44 am

kobeaki wrote:
TyCobb wrote:Power trip huh? How many times have I ever warned you or suspended you? Stop being paranoid and just make better posts.

It's a deal, but you guys need to more proactive and neutral in how you police this place.

Yes , I do come across as aggressive. I don't always mean to.

Well I don't think name-calling was ever acceptable here.

But now that we got this out of the way, let's get back to the Knicks/Lakers game analysis.

Gek · Post #590 » by **Gek** » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:38 pm

TyCobb wrote:Your ass should have been canned years ago, but I'll give you a little teaching before I give you the final boot.

"You think an emotionally (Please Use More Appropriate Word) big man with a back problem( medical science cannot fix backs, btw) who In btw, in 6 months is gonna be courted more heavily than a hooker at a porn convention...

Vs an emotionally (Please Use More Appropriate Word) big man with knee problems who at the very least we had under contract, with bad knees, yes... Much easier to fix than a back, btw."

Tell me how this makes sense.

Thank you for pointing out this irony. I was long asleep by then. Interesting last few pages though.