ImageImageImageImageImage

We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch.

Moderators: Kilroy, TyCobb, Danny Darko

User avatar
KobeKenobi
Senior
Posts: 537
And1: 222
Joined: Apr 11, 2014

We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#1 » by KobeKenobi » Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:21 am

Mitch had a great run and no question that the franchise probably should have a statue of him next to Magic and Kareem...and retire his name on the wall. Mitch is HOF.....legendary GM.

I just think Mitch lost his touch somewhere down the line. I know we won 2 rings just 5 years ago...I know. Yes the CP3 trade set us back big time and Mitch did everything he could to bounce back. Mitch should of known getting Nash was a mistake however. Most of us didn't know...but I think he really of should have know not to get Nash. He should of been the sensible one to know that he is getting too up there in age for that kind of contract.

I also think it was obvious Mitch should of went after Jameer Nelson. Remember this post?

viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1336831&start=20

We needed redundancy at the PG position since Nash is near broke from what happened last season. Clarkson isn't ready to lead at the point. Lin is fine, but Jameer would of given this team a good heady PG that could shoot the ball.

Now look where we are. Nash literally has a fork in him. Clarkson and Lin have injury issues. Nelson would of been the perfect backup PG for Lin. And while I like Price, if Lin goes down at any point in the season we are literally screwed.

And why keep Wesley Johnson? It makes no sense.... :crazy:
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,348
And1: 3,034
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#2 » by Sofa King » Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:36 am

We should get another point guard. We drafted Clarkson, but he's more of a shooting guard now.

I think we'll be fine when Lin gets back. Clarkson should add another scoring option off the bench.

It's a fragile team. Any injury could set us back.

We'll have to look for the D-League to fill up the roster.
User avatar
ChokeFasncists
RealGM
Posts: 14,978
And1: 1,501
Joined: Jan 19, 2014
 

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#3 » by ChokeFasncists » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:40 am

Sacre needs to be more careful. Lin should be OK. Nelson's pretty old anyways. It's really too bad Marshall had to be waived, couldn't Boozer's bid be a bit lower or something?
MorbidHEAT wrote:My dislike for Lin started during Linsanity. It was absurd. It's probably irrational dislike at this point, but man he gets on my nerves. He's been tearing us up though.
Thanks for the honesty.
User avatar
Mirjalovic
Head Coach
Posts: 7,053
And1: 1,780
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !
   

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#4 » by Mirjalovic » Sat Oct 18, 2014 11:10 am

Yeah, mitch lost his touch.

The big evident is he unable to think if its all Sacre fault.
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.

Sixers fans...

Image
5ertwenty
Sophomore
Posts: 193
And1: 27
Joined: Apr 02, 2013

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#5 » by 5ertwenty » Sat Oct 18, 2014 12:03 pm

Are you serious? Mitch has lost his touch?! Kobe, Bynum, Marc, Pau, CP3, Dwight, Nash - what's that, like 7 all-stars he's been able to "acquire"? This is just brilliant IMO, compared to other GM's, he's on an other level. The bad luck is what's got in the way of success. How can you blame Mitch for the Chris Paul veto, the Dwight debacle and the Nash injury? You just can't. And even this off-season: getting Lin for basically nothing was vintage Kupchack.

The only real "errors" of judgement have been the coaching choices - but when you're trying to replace the GOAT Phil Jackson, every attempt to fill his seat looks like a blunder, especially when the said coach hasn't got a healthy team to work with.

I don't think Kupchack has lost his touch. I do not blame any of the misfortunes on Mitch. I just think we've had a most unfortunate string of bad luck - that's it.

Mitch is the best. Peace.
Jordan | Kobe | Kareem| Bird | Magic
Tiesto_Lakers
Analyst
Posts: 3,417
And1: 4,154
Joined: Jul 02, 2013

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#6 » by Tiesto_Lakers » Sat Oct 18, 2014 2:16 pm

I'm not saying he lost his touch, but if you were to tell me in 2010 that Gasol, Odom and Bynum would all be off the team four years later and replaced with virtually no one, I would be thinking twice about Mitch's ability to build a contender.
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 14,639
And1: 6,513
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#7 » by Michael Lucky » Sat Oct 18, 2014 2:54 pm

Mitch has nothing to work with. No GM in the world could possibly be successful in his position. The new CBA has literally destroyed any advantage the Lakers previously enjoyed through their market. On top of it they are stuck with aging stars and in an era where you basically need a young star in order to attract other max contract player. The lakers are in a bad position to upgrade quickly. Thank the new cba for that. Heck the whole Nash trade was a means to appease Dr. Buss. Nothing Mitch can do about that when his owner is making the moves for him. The next couple of years will be bad and there's nothing anyone could do about it. Let's just hope we can rebuild well through the draft and get lucky in FA.
AdonisDeMarion
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,324
And1: 121
Joined: Jun 22, 2012

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#8 » by AdonisDeMarion » Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:49 pm

5ertwenty wrote:Are you serious? Mitch has lost his touch?! Kobe, Bynum, Marc, Pau, CP3, Dwight, Nash - what's that, like 7 all-stars he's been able to "acquire"? This is just brilliant IMO, compared to other GM's, he's on an other level. The bad luck is what's got in the way of success. How can you blame Mitch for the Chris Paul veto, the Dwight debacle and the Nash injury? You just can't. And even this off-season: getting Lin for basically nothing was vintage Kupchack.

The only real "errors" of judgement have been the coaching choices - but when you're trying to replace the GOAT Phil Jackson, every attempt to fill his seat looks like a blunder, especially when the said coach hasn't got a healthy team to work with.

I don't think Kupchack has lost his touch. I do not blame any of the misfortunes on Mitch. I just think we've had a most unfortunate string of bad luck - that's it.





Mitch is the best. Peace.


AMEN
User avatar
Marionettetc
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,779
And1: 969
Joined: Jun 26, 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
   

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#9 » by Marionettetc » Sat Oct 18, 2014 4:53 pm

I think you're overvaluing just what a general manager can do given present circumstances, and undervaluing how much of the business is out of anyone's control.

A well run organization can put itself in a position to win, but it can't will itself to just have the best players and a 82-0 record every year.

It's unreasonable to expect the Lakers to have the best talent in the league every year.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 20,987
And1: 21,683
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#10 » by Pointgod » Sat Oct 18, 2014 5:29 pm

I'm not sure that it's Mitch losing his touch than Jim Buss having no direction. The problem with the Lakers is that they're all or nothing with when it comes to building a team. They expect superstars to just beg to play for them. That's not realistic. You can't tell me this team wouldn't be better off in the short term and future with Lance Stephenson over Jordan Hill
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#11 » by DEEP3CL » Sat Oct 18, 2014 5:37 pm

Michael Lucky wrote:The new CBA has literally destroyed any advantage the Lakers previously enjoyed through their market.
The day the league signed that thing into effect, I tracked the teams that were on top prior to that CBA. Every one of them are in destitute mode because of that CBA. I'm all for a lockout in 2017, I don't give a damn if there is no ball. More than just player salaries will change with that. Remember not all of the owners was on board with that CBA.

KobeKenobi wrote: Most of us didn't know...but I think he really of should have know not to get Nash. He should of been the sensible one to know that he is getting too up there in age for that kind of contract.
I knew and was spitting it all over this board that we didn't need Nash, he was busted up in his last season in Phoenix. And people love giving the Phoenix medical staff all these props for being the best, hell not even them could save his bust body.

Tiesto_Lakers wrote:but if you were to tell me in 2010 that Gasol, Odom and Bynum would all be off the team four years later and replaced with virtually no one,
Not true on Bynum, he was replaced.....we just don't have the coward here to show for it. Gasol is 34 years old, he was bottoming out anyways most big do after 32-33 anyway. Only the Odom deal was a push for nothing.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,762
And1: 4,763
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#12 » by snaquille oatmeal » Sat Oct 18, 2014 5:48 pm

DEEP even the Odom move was brilliant in my opinion considering what happened to him
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
User avatar
Marionettetc
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,779
And1: 969
Joined: Jun 26, 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
   

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#13 » by Marionettetc » Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:33 pm

I agree with what you have to say Deep.

I think a lot of our fellow fans are a bit spoiled when it comes to team success. You generally don't turn a team around overnight, and I think it's way too early to jump the gun on calling for management's collective heads.

I'm happy with the direction the team is heading towards. We're trying to make moves that better the team and making the best of the current roster. At a certain point we all need to just chill and enjoy basketball. The team is what it is, and will improve. There's really no need to start questioning Mitch, of all people, the dude who is clearly one of the top GMs in the league just because we aren't loaded with four all stars and a deep bench.
User avatar
ChokeFasncists
RealGM
Posts: 14,978
And1: 1,501
Joined: Jan 19, 2014
 

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#14 » by ChokeFasncists » Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:44 pm

He did kinda take excessive risk with the Dwight thing, but how is Bynum doing?
MorbidHEAT wrote:My dislike for Lin started during Linsanity. It was absurd. It's probably irrational dislike at this point, but man he gets on my nerves. He's been tearing us up though.
Thanks for the honesty.
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#15 » by DEEP3CL » Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:38 pm

snaquille oatmeal wrote:DEEP even the Odom move was brilliant in my opinion considering what happened to him
Well in terms of where LO is now and kinda seeing where he was heading even before leaving us...then yeah it was genius.

But when I look at deals, I try to see how the team can sustain some type of run from it. Now we shipped LO to the Mavs for a #1 pick which was protected if it landed in the top 20 spots. It ended up being #21 (Mitch McGary) and we eventually sent the pick to Houston, the Rockets sent it to OKC to finish off the Harden deal.

So we got nothing basically, but I don't blame Mitch for that. LO was sliding down hill even before he left here.We wasn't going to get much more for LO than we did at the time Mitch originally shipped him off in most controversial deal ever blown up by a commissioner.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
User avatar
DEEP3CL
RealGM
Posts: 27,899
And1: 3,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
     

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#16 » by DEEP3CL » Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:55 pm

To people wondering if Mitch lost his touch,I hate rehashing it but.....

Los Angeles Lakers: PG Chris Paul (from NO Hornets)

New Orleans Hornets: F Lamar Odom (from LA Lakers), SG Kevin Martin (from HOU Rockets), PF Luis Scola (from HOU Rockets), PG Goran Dragic (from HOU Rockets)

Houston Rockets: PF Pau Gasol (from LA Lakers)

And people had the never to say the Hornets got whacked ?....Bull chit, that was a playoff team hands down.

It was a deal where everybody came up roses. Now comparing that to what the Hornets eventually ended up with, only Eric Gordon remains and he's still trying to get out of NO only because he doesn't like Monty Williams. And the Hornets while steadily improving are still a long ways off from doing any damage.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN

SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
User avatar
Jakay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,496
And1: 5,928
Joined: Jan 27, 2003
Location: Half out of my mind
Contact:

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#17 » by Jakay » Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:25 pm

Keep in mind West seemed like he was in a deep rut and went to Memphis and made them relevant out of nowhere. All GMs go through their fair share of bad times. Only Buford has been exempt due to the longevity of their three main guys plus Pop, but he's not immune either.
AdonisDeMarion
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,324
And1: 121
Joined: Jun 22, 2012

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#18 » by AdonisDeMarion » Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:28 pm

DEEP3CL wrote:To people wondering if Mitch lost his touch,I hate rehashing it but.....

Los Angeles Lakers: PG Chris Paul (from NO Hornets)

New Orleans Hornets: F Lamar Odom (from LA Lakers), SG Kevin Martin (from HOU Rockets), PF Luis Scola (from HOU Rockets), PG Goran Dragic (from HOU Rockets)

Houston Rockets: PF Pau Gasol (from LA Lakers)

And people had the never to say the Hornets got whacked ?....Bull chit, that was a playoff team hands down.

It was a deal where everybody came up roses. Now comparing that to what the Hornets eventually ended up with, only Eric Gordon remains and he's still trying to get out of NO only because he doesn't like Monty Williams. And the Hornets while steadily improving are still a long ways off from doing any damage.



preach
desertlakerfan
Analyst
Posts: 3,066
And1: 32
Joined: May 20, 2009
Location: Where none like it hot
   

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#19 » by desertlakerfan » Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:52 pm

It's funny how a top tier GM suddenly "loses his touch" after a new owner takes over the reigns.
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,522
And1: 12,222
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: We have to ask ourselves if Mitch lost his touch. 

Post#20 » by Kilroy » Sat Oct 18, 2014 11:03 pm

This thread is reactionary and going nowhere...
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...

Return to Los Angeles Lakers