MelosSoreWrist wrote:The Skyhook wrote:I forgot to upload this picture from the Lakers @ Knicks game earlier this month. Wish I had a version without the snap chat caption bar.
This might be an unpopular opinion here but I dont think Russell, Randle, and Clarkson are cornerstones to championship contention. Ideally I think they develop to be 3rd, 4th, 5th guys on a great team. Draft Simmons, sign Durant... thats a core to build around. Russell, Randle and Clarkson are parts that may be used or traded.
LA loved them some Nick Van Exel, Eddie Jones and Elden Campbell. And they were good fun players. But you dont win championships with them. You win it with Kobe and Shaq.
I think that's a spot-on analogy, especially since that's exactly how the Lakers reached championship level- signing an FA and drafting a superstar to lead the other players. The other aspect is that they eventually hired the right coach to seal the deal, but we all know about Byron already.
The Lakers had some nice players (Ceballos and Threat were also around that time), but were definitely on the outside of the true contender group looking in, before they signed Shaq. To win a title you can't just have good players, you have to have a couple of guys that comparatively dominate the competition. Not sure I see that in Russell, Randle, or Clarkson.