Michael Lucky wrote:No my point is that we don't actually know what is going on and who is in the right in this situation. Johnny wasn't fired last month. I just believe we have a right to hear their side of their story as much as Jeanie's. Just because Jim was a failure as an executive doesn't automatically give Jeanie the right to do whatever she wants either. I have no problem with Jim being removed from his position since his last stint over the summer was a complete failure and we'll be paying for it over the next three years. Having said that I have seen nothing from Jeanie that makes me any more confident in her abilities to get this team out of the cellar and competitive for championships. Mostly because throughout the last decade she has been the one that has constantly gone to the media to lay the dirt out when it comes to the inner workings and thoughts of the front office. Something that is very damaging to the image as a whole of the team.
Actually, I believe as controlling owner of the Lakers she indeed has the authority to make any move she wants. Jim may have his own side of the story, but it appears he has no legal leg to stand on here:
According to Streisand, the trust commands that the trust (effectively the Buss family) retain control of the Lakers until the trust is terminated. The wording of the trust, as excerpted by Streisand, also highlights the wish of Dr. Buss for his daughter to remain in control of the team: “the Trustees shall take whatever actions are reasonably available to them to have JEANIE M. BUSS appointed as the new Controlling Owner of The Los Angeles Lakers, Inc.”
http://www.si.com/nba/2017/03/03/los-angeles-lakers-jeanie-buss-jim-buss-magic-johnson-rob-pelinka-court-family-trustWhat Jeannie has done is no different than any other NBA (controlling) owner firing FO personnel, head coach, etc. Whether Jeannie or Jim is more qualified to make the basketball decisions isn't actually relevant, though Jim's track record has been poor and Jeannie's/Magic's is still to be seen. I don't know if there is any plausible chance to have the trust be dissolved, if the trust itself covers this (EDIT- a sale of the team would dissolve the trust and requires a majority vote by the 6 voting family members-
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/feb/19/sports/la-sp-lakers-ownership-20130219)
Unless there is other relevant clauses in the trust that change the quoted text, Jim and Johnny have no ability to force any change in the ownership structure of the Lakers, or change the controlling owner of the Lakers. This was a pretty amateur hour move, I mean I guess no harm in trying? But it makes them look bad, and is bad PR for the Laker organization as a whole.