ESPN radio reported that the Lakers and Heat are in talks that would trade Lamar Odom and the #58 pick to Miami. In exchange the Heat would trade to the Lakers Mark Blount, Udonis Haslem and Miami's coveted #2 pick in the draft. Rumor has it Riley is trying to clear cap space as much as he can, and wants Odom back in the fold.
#2 to lakers?
Moderators: Kilroy, TyCobb, Danny Darko
#2 to lakers?
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 54
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 03, 2007
#2 to lakers?
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,874
- And1: 13
- Joined: Jun 03, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: #2 to lakers?
WoW.....if that turns out to be true...WOW, we would then get Beasely...or even Mayo, who is a hometown fav
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,882
- And1: 25
- Joined: Oct 09, 2007
- Location: L.A.
Re: #2 to lakers?
After we get Beasly we'll trade Luke for Lebron. That Beasley deal is some no legged rumor flotaing around on CL.com.
Re: #2 to lakers?
- Laker1
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,381
- And1: 154
- Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Re: #2 to lakers?
pshh, I hope its true. At least this rumor makes sense. salary wise.
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 24,393
- And1: 3,366
- Joined: Jan 20, 2005
- Location: El Segundo
- Contact:
Re: #2 to lakers?
this aint happen..
Re: #2 to lakers?
- TonyMontana
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,726
- And1: 398
- Joined: Apr 27, 2006
- Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
Re: #2 to lakers?
WOW, Thats crazy if it happens, but I doubt it.
Imagine Pat Riley ex Lakers great helping his old team out...........McHale started a bad trend when he decided to help his old team out.
Imagine Pat Riley ex Lakers great helping his old team out...........McHale started a bad trend when he decided to help his old team out.
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,744
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 20, 2005
- Location: California
Re: #2 to lakers?
Where would beasley play?? Small Forward? PF off the bench? I'd rather keep lamar and trade him for a more seasoned player that can contribute now. The last thing we need on this team is younger players.
Re: #2 to lakers?
- TonyMontana
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,726
- And1: 398
- Joined: Apr 27, 2006
- Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
Re: #2 to lakers?
Chubby Chaser wrote:Where would beasley play?? Small Forward? PF off the bench? I'd rather keep lamar and trade him for a more seasoned player that can contribute now. The last thing we need on this team is younger players.
We are talking about beasley you know.
Re: #2 to lakers?
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,312
- And1: 24,568
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re: #2 to lakers?
i don't think odds of that happening are good
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,275
- And1: 454
- Joined: Jun 20, 2008
Re: #2 to lakers?
You mean, no odds of it happening.
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 223
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 10, 2008
- Location: NewYork,NY
Re: #2 to lakers?
Dream on!!!!
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,658
- And1: 1,285
- Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Re: #2 to lakers?
Jerry West got us Gasol so why can't Riley get us Beasley?
Re: #2 to lakers?
- tracey_nice
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,531
- And1: 274
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: PAUUSE
Re: #2 to lakers?
El Hardee wrote:After we get Beasly we'll trade Luke for Lebron. .
I really like this idea..guys, lets do it!
Re: #2 to lakers?
- kno
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 19,495
- And1: 24
- Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Re: #2 to lakers?
lmao @ this rumor.
I'd say there is a -70% chance of this trade going down.
And to top it off, my prediction is most likely more accurate than this rumor.
I'd say there is a -70% chance of this trade going down.
And to top it off, my prediction is most likely more accurate than this rumor.
Re: #2 to lakers?
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,312
- And1: 24,568
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re: #2 to lakers?
microfib4thewin wrote:You mean, no odds of it happening.
i meant what i said, it could happen, but it is highly unlikely
i just put down 200 on -70% - since i'm assuming Kno has the inside scoop
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 21
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 06, 2008
Re: #2 to lakers?
This is unnecessary. If we're gonna do anything in this draft, we need to get a pick in the 30-40 range and get Dorsey.
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,830
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 02, 2007
- Location: OC, CA
Re: #2 to lakers?
If anything I could see Marion coming here for Lamar, before I see us ripping that #2 pick away.
Although Riley fn' owes us for giving us Butler instead of Flash in that final hour. I don't want ' Beasley either...Mayo, Love, Rose I'll accept if this nutty rumor was in fact true. Beasley is an undersized PF scorer with a punk attitude, that doesn't play D, he's a tweener without a consistant J.
Although Riley fn' owes us for giving us Butler instead of Flash in that final hour. I don't want ' Beasley either...Mayo, Love, Rose I'll accept if this nutty rumor was in fact true. Beasley is an undersized PF scorer with a punk attitude, that doesn't play D, he's a tweener without a consistant J.
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 20,149
- And1: 5,609
- Joined: Feb 23, 2005
- Location: Austin, Tejas
Re: #2 to lakers?
I wouldn't complain if this came to be.
Re: #2 to lakers?
- CITYOFANGELSX3
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,011
- And1: 151
- Joined: May 31, 2007
- Location: Southside, Ca
Re: #2 to lakers?
Riley likes to rob people in trades, not get robbed.
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,794
- And1: 99
- Joined: Apr 12, 2007
- Location: cali baby
Re: #2 to lakers?
wtf is this? lol
too good to be true....why would the heat want odom if they have a chance at brand? who is a lot better
too good to be true....why would the heat want odom if they have a chance at brand? who is a lot better