niffoc4 wrote:Uhh... if the Hawks were willing to give up Harris for JJ the Hawks would just take Harris.
Humm... atl fan here. I think we'd just do that deal
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
niffoc4 wrote:Uhh... if the Hawks were willing to give up Harris for JJ the Hawks would just take Harris.
geeman wrote:niffoc4 wrote:Uhh... if the Hawks were willing to give up Harris for JJ the Hawks would just take Harris.
Humm... atl fan here. I think we'd just do that deal
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
BigSlam wrote:spectre_ wrote:I'd be pretty satisfied with this deal. We utilize our expiring for space to keep TT and upgrade the PG spot. Add in a couple vet mins and I think we'd be good to roll.
I'm not sold on Harris being that much of an upgrade over Felts.
RaptorJ wrote:they (Bobcats' fans) seem to be some of the least intelligent posters on RealGM from some of the trash they say.
vincecarter4pres wrote:geeman wrote:niffoc4 wrote:Uhh... if the Hawks were willing to give up Harris for JJ the Hawks would just take Harris.
Humm... atl fan here. I think we'd just do that deal
I don't get it.
Are you one of those guys that actually thinks ATL will get back good value for JJ in a S&T?
niffoc4 wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:I don't get it.
Are you one of those guys that actually thinks ATL will get back good value for JJ in a S&T?
Both of us are solely commenting on the trade proposed, and wondering why the Bobcats are in the trade at all. JJ doesn't care who gets Devin Harris...but the Hawks should prefer a good PG over an ok PG and Chandler.
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Return to Trades and Transactions