A New Los Angels Lakers Offseason

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

rugby-hook
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 16, 2009

Re: A New Los Angels Lakers Offseason 

Post#21 » by rugby-hook » Sat May 29, 2010 3:36 am

Buy a pick from Atl is a good option as well. I would still take Warren because he is bigger. Farmar has got to go. I like Acie Law over Farmar every day.
CDM88
Banned User
Posts: 3,128
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Lomita,CA

Re: A New Los Angels Lakers Offseason 

Post#22 » by CDM88 » Sat May 29, 2010 3:39 am

rugby-hook wrote:Buy a pick from Atl is a good option as well. I would still take Warren because he is bigger. Farmar has got to go. I like Acie Law over Farmar every day.

Acie Law sucks. If Bledsoe is there at 24 u take him and run
rugby-hook
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 16, 2009

Re: A New Los Angels Lakers Offseason 

Post#23 » by rugby-hook » Sat May 29, 2010 8:50 am

neverthelss, for LAL's purposes, Law is a better fit than Farmar in ability and dollars as well.
User avatar
Jajwanda
General Manager
Posts: 8,611
And1: 105
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: A New Los Angels Lakers Offseason 

Post#24 » by Jajwanda » Sat May 29, 2010 8:35 pm

I could see Law coming off the bench as the third PG for the minimum. Farmar's play hasn't been anything to write home about or spend money on.

We'll agreed to disagree on your analysis of the Laker defense. Bynum's anchoring ability isn't as light and day over Gasol as you may think. Overall defensively and with help rotations Bosh would nearly even the Gasol-Bynum front court. Offensively it would be that much better.

Return to Trades and Transactions