ORL-CAVS

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,633
And1: 32,193
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#41 » by jbk1234 » Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:21 pm

j_n wrote:
B Mac wrote:Im shocked to see this "idea" has made it to 3 pages, but I guess I'll add on to it to say how lopsided the value is. I honestly thought it was a joke offer when I first read it. The Cavs say no on this, without even a second thought.

I honestly dont get it, Are pepole overating this draft thinking there are much better options than Harris? are they underating Harris because of his team record?
Does anyone think the cavs are going to get another top pick next year or that Afflalo isnt earning his contract? what is it that isnt fair about this trade?


Okay this draft is terrible. We will trade you Zeller for the No. 2 overall.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
j_n
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,824
And1: 1,684
Joined: Mar 19, 2010
 

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#42 » by j_n » Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:29 pm

jbk1234 wrote:Okay this draft is terrible. We will trade you Zeller for the No. 2 overall.

Did Zeller put up 17.5/8.4 with 1.5 blocks and 1 steal as a 20 year old sophmore?
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,633
And1: 32,193
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#43 » by jbk1234 » Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:49 pm

j_n wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Okay this draft is terrible. We will trade you Zeller for the No. 2 overall.

Did Zeller put up 17.5/8.4 with 1.5 blocks and 1 steal as a 20 year old sophmore?


Well Zeller was a rookie so no. Not for nothing, but Harris didn't put up those numbers for his entire sophmore season. Those are his post trade stats.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
bgrep14
Veteran
Posts: 2,630
And1: 211
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#44 » by bgrep14 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:42 am

ttobias harris is better than anyone in this draft ? he doesnt even start on the second worst team in the nba... easy no for the cavs ...
User avatar
NashtyNas
RealGM
Posts: 10,259
And1: 1,887
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
       

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#45 » by NashtyNas » Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:58 am

j_n wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Okay this draft is terrible. We will trade you Zeller for the No. 2 overall.

Did Zeller put up 17.5/8.4 with 1.5 blocks and 1 steal as a 20 year old sophmore?


Did Harris? No, he did that for like 20 games - that doesn't make him worth the #1 all of a sudden. If you think this draft is so weak, and Harris is so good, why are you willing to trade him for #1? I mean if McLemore or any of the other prospects you named aren't as good as Harris - just keep Harris; more importantly, keep him because no one is trading you what you expect in return for him. We're not agreeing to disagree - we're agreeing that your valuation of your players is ridiculous - everyone other than a few ORL fans agrees with that so you can keep Harris and the rest of the teams will keep their ACTUAL valuable pieces.

I for one know that I would waaaaay rather take a gamble on McLemore or Noel than go for the "sure thing" in Harris (and him being a "sure thing" is debatable to say the least).
Image

The underappreciated greats:
Image

Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#46 » by TheOUTLAW » Tue Jun 25, 2013 4:27 am

No point in getting testy over this, neither team thinks they are getting the value for their assets that they'd want. So that's a no deal from both sides.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
User avatar
Ducklett
Head Coach
Posts: 7,172
And1: 5,017
Joined: Jul 17, 2012
 

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#47 » by Ducklett » Tue Jun 25, 2013 6:48 am

ZCM93 wrote:
Ducklett wrote:In the month of April:

Dion Waiters: 13.5 Points, 2.5 Rebounds, 2.5 Assists on ~43% shooting

Tobias Harris: 19.8 Points, 9.8 Rebounds, 3.4 Assists, 1.4 Blocks on 44% shooting

Yeah, Tobes couldn't hold Waiter's jock strap for sure. (Eye roll)

People on these boards are just plain moronic.


Harris stat padded playing only 8 games with 40+ MPG while Waiters played 4 games with 22 MPG.

Lets not even bring up the other 6 months where Waiters takes a big dump on Harris stats.

Harris hasn't proven anything but he can put up decent chucker stats on a bad team playing 40 MPG. VERY limited upside unlike Waiters who has upside to be a TOP 5 SG.


The Cavs were equally terrible and this guy couldn't get minutes... Great talk dude. After his trade to the Magic, he got minutes, and put up some pretty incredible numbers playing out of his nature position. Waiters could barely stay on the floor, but I guess that is because he is a such a great, future HOF player and Byron Scott had no idea what he was doing. I bet that is why he was fired!
User avatar
ZCM93
Rookie
Posts: 1,160
And1: 491
Joined: Feb 16, 2010
   

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#48 » by ZCM93 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 6:52 am

Yes Scott had no clue how to coach I agree, Waiters playing limited minutes was a good call since we needed to lose every game we could, which worked out see has we landed the #1 pick. While the Magic blew it by letting Harris chuck up a storm for 40 minutes a night in meaningless games.
Image
BadWolf
General Manager
Posts: 8,749
And1: 3,239
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#49 » by BadWolf » Tue Jun 25, 2013 7:25 am

Found this from wizenheimer in another thread

go back to Synergy and run a comparison between Matthews and Waiters. On offense, Matthews ranked 39th in the NBA with 1.02 points/possession. Waiters ranked 309th with 0.85 points/possession. On defense, Matthews ranked 87th allowing 0.82 points/possession. Waiters gave up 1.06 points/possession which ranked 446th in the league. That's right, 446. 30 teams...15 players....that's 450. Waiters almost made it to 450... :roll:
MagicFan32
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 790
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
     

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#50 » by MagicFan32 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 7:56 am

no thanks, tobias harris is better than any player in this draft, he'd immediately become one of clevelands top 3 players. funny to see them poo-poo this tho lol
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
MagicFan32
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 790
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
     

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#51 » by MagicFan32 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 7:57 am

TheOUTLAW wrote:He might have more impact short term, but he's still not worth our first rounders. It's not like Orlando is movie first rounders and don't act as though these are big impact players or they'd have made more of an impact on Orlando. These guys are mediocre after 2 yrs. Don't see that changing.

harris is 20 years old!!!! :o
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
Mr Loggins
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,987
And1: 2,408
Joined: Jul 22, 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#52 » by Mr Loggins » Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:12 pm

MagicFan32 wrote:no thanks, tobias harris is better than any player in this draft, he'd immediately become one of clevelands top 3 players. funny to see them poo-poo this tho lol


I'm not going to say for sure Harris will be good or bad; just (imo) the #1 overall is a lot of value for a guy who had a three week hot stretch.....
User avatar
j_n
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,824
And1: 1,684
Joined: Mar 19, 2010
 

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#53 » by j_n » Tue Jun 25, 2013 2:12 pm

BosBorgon wrote:I'm not going to say for sure Harris will be good or bad; just (imo) the #1 overall is a lot of value for a guy who had a three week hot stretch.....

Tobias Harris played for Orlando for 2 months and 27 games(NBA level).
Nerlens Noel,who seem like a very possible #1 pick in this draft played 24 games in NCAA level.

If you want to argue that Harris havent played in a high enough level or doesnt have much upside, fine, but there are plenty of teams that used their #1 overall for players who have shown much less than a 27 game stretch in the NBA, including players who never even played an NCAA game.
Mr Loggins
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,987
And1: 2,408
Joined: Jul 22, 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#54 » by Mr Loggins » Tue Jun 25, 2013 2:26 pm

j_n wrote:
BosBorgon wrote:I'm not going to say for sure Harris will be good or bad; just (imo) the #1 overall is a lot of value for a guy who had a three week hot stretch.....

Tobias Harris played for Orlando for 2 months and 27 games(NBA level).
Nerlens Noel,who seem like a very possible #1 pick in this draft played 24 games in NCAA level.

If you want to argue that Harris havent played in a high enough level or doesnt have much upside, fine, but there are plenty of teams that used their #1 overall for players who have shown much less than a 27 game stretch in the NBA, including players who never even played an NCAA game.


I don't want to get into a whole "thing" here, but magic fans quote the numbers "17, 8, 1.5" as the reason why Harris is so valuable - numbers that on a superficial glance largely come upon his last 14 or so games.

Your comparison to ncaa players is apples to oranges.
User avatar
j_n
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,824
And1: 1,684
Joined: Mar 19, 2010
 

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#55 » by j_n » Tue Jun 25, 2013 2:36 pm

BosBorgon wrote:I don't want to get into a whole "thing" here, but magic fans quote the numbers "17, 8, 1.5" as the reason why Harris is so valuable - numbers that on a superficial glance largely come upon his last 14 or so games.


Your comparison to ncaa players is an apples to oranges comparison.

Sooo, should we ignore his better games when posting his stats?
Thats what he put up since he came to Orlando, if I didnt realize it was too small of a sample size I would say that in his last two weeks he put up 20/10 but I posted his numbers since he came to Orlando.

As far as the NCAA and the NBA, I agree, I was just making a point that whenever you use your draft pick on any prospect there is a risk and a lot of unknowns but in Harris' case the risk and uncertainty are minimal because he already showed that he can play at high level in the NBA as opposed to the prospects in this draft.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,633
And1: 32,193
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#56 » by jbk1234 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 3:29 pm

BadWolf wrote:Found this from wizenheimer in another thread

go back to Synergy and run a comparison between Matthews and Waiters. On offense, Matthews ranked 39th in the NBA with 1.02 points/possession. Waiters ranked 309th with 0.85 points/possession. On defense, Matthews ranked 87th allowing 0.82 points/possession. Waiters gave up 1.06 points/possession which ranked 446th in the league. That's right, 446. 30 teams...15 players....that's 450. Waiters almost made it to 450... :roll:


Digging pretty deep there for a rationalization as to how Matthews and Waiters are comparable players. You can keep Matthews and your selective use of statistics, I'll keep Waiters and what my eyes tell me when he is playing the game.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,633
And1: 32,193
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#57 » by jbk1234 » Tue Jun 25, 2013 3:30 pm

MagicFan32 wrote:no thanks, tobias harris is better than any player in this draft, he'd immediately become one of clevelands top 3 players. funny to see them poo-poo this tho lol


That is quote worth saving for 8 months from now.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
MagicFan32
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 790
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
     

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#58 » by MagicFan32 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:41 am

BosBorgon wrote:
MagicFan32 wrote:no thanks, tobias harris is better than any player in this draft, he'd immediately become one of clevelands top 3 players. funny to see them poo-poo this tho lol


I'm not going to say for sure Harris will be good or bad; just (imo) the #1 overall is a lot of value for a guy who had a three week hot stretch.....

after the all star break he averaged 17 points, 8.5 rebounds, 2 assists 1.5 blocks and 1 steal. in his first extended minutes as a starter ever.....and he's younger than alot of players in this draft
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
MagicFan32
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 790
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
     

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#59 » by MagicFan32 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:42 am

jbk1234 wrote:
MagicFan32 wrote:no thanks, tobias harris is better than any player in this draft, he'd immediately become one of clevelands top 3 players. funny to see them poo-poo this tho lol


That is quote worth saving for 8 months from now.

please bump it when he's putting up 18 and 10
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,633
And1: 32,193
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: ORL-CAVS 

Post#60 » by jbk1234 » Wed Jun 26, 2013 3:09 pm

MagicFan32 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
MagicFan32 wrote:no thanks, tobias harris is better than any player in this draft, he'd immediately become one of clevelands top 3 players. funny to see them poo-poo this tho lol


That is quote worth saving for 8 months from now.

please bump it when he's putting up 18 and 10
o

Tobias Harris might be better than the guy the Cavs select. That is the risk of the draft. But to say that Tobias Harris is better than any player in this draft means that not one all-star will come out of this draft. That seems beyond unlikely.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.

Return to Trades and Transactions