SideSwipe wrote:Yeah, I'm guessing you did not watch him play.
No, I watched all nine games and the stats back up what I saw.
SideSwipe wrote:Cousins minutes mostly came after the games were won against the lower-level competition.
So you're saying that after we played the worse opponents in the tournament then that's when Cousins saw more minutes thus making his better stats more impressive? Or are you saying that the starters would get a big enough lead in the opening minutes that the game was already out of reach? Either way, both are false.
16, 13, 11, 12 ,15, 14, 13, 13, 17 - that is the minute distribution for Cousins. Seems pretty consistent to me.
Our first half, specifically, our first quarter was our roughest period of play throughout the tournament, so don't give me this "the game was out of reach" argument when Cousins would come in. Our second unit often times was the unit that would get us the lead.
SideSwipe wrote:I love how you only did per 36 stats, which makes it easier to hide his turnovers, and the fact that he couldn't earn more minutes over Faried and Davis.
I use per 36 stats to put all 3 guys on a level playing field. Looking into it any further is just plain foolish. It's not my fault the numbers are what they are. Blame Cousins.
The reason Cousins doesn't start/get as many minutes is because Coach K likes his bigs to be athletic who get out on the break and finish above the rim. This is something Cousins is not, but just because Cousins doesn't fit that type of player, it doesn't mean he can't/won't be a very effective player when he was out there.
SideSwipe wrote:Look Cousins shows some nice skills from time to time, but he is not consistent
Shows some nice skills from time to time? I didn't know that's how people talk about the best offensive center in the game and perhaps the best all around center in the game after his defensive performance last year and in FIBA.
SideSwipe wrote:he is pouty
So? Just because you're pout, it doesn't make you an ineffective player. Look at Duncan. He's always been a pouty player.
Besides Cousins had continued to mature every year since coming into the league (most noticeably this last year). It's hard for those who haven't watched every one of his games to know that and see that progression. Especially with the media taking shots at him every change they get.
SideSwipe wrote:and despite his physical attributes he was not able to impose his will on the games. I watched them all at FIBA, and watched him 5 or 6 times last year, and followed his box scores.
I'm sorry, but the tape and the numbers say otherwise. I don't know what else can be said on the matter.
SideSwipe wrote:I will stick by my statement 100% I would not offer more for him than Al Horford in trade.
You're entitled to your opinion, but Cousins is already one of the most dominant big men in the league and is on the the road to being the most dominant big man in the league. To me, those types of players are valued a little higher than Horford.