Simple Trade Idea - SAC/IND/ATL

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,205
And1: 1,532
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: Simple Trade Idea - SAC/IND/ATL 

Post#21 » by Boneman2 » Sun May 24, 2015 1:25 pm

tbhawksfan1 wrote:Variation cutting Indy out:

Teague
#15
#59

for

#6
McLemore
Collison

Either side can be tweeked, say McL to Stauskas or variation on ATL picks


I love this for Atl, not so much for Sac.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
tbhawksfan1
Analyst
Posts: 3,379
And1: 2,036
Joined: May 23, 2015

Re: Simple Trade Idea - SAC/IND/ATL 

Post#22 » by tbhawksfan1 » Sun May 24, 2015 2:26 pm

I'd also accept if it was Stauskas instead of Mc and our #50 instead of #59 any closer to value?
sdballer
Senior
Posts: 700
And1: 269
Joined: Dec 30, 2012

Re: Simple Trade Idea - SAC/IND/ATL 

Post#23 » by sdballer » Sun May 24, 2015 3:43 pm

The revised deal doesn't make sense for sac. For the decent upgrade from collison to Teague, you give up your starting sg and the pick needed to fill another position of need. Creates more holes by solving one of the least urgent.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 91,793
And1: 36,505
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: Simple Trade Idea - SAC/IND/ATL 

Post#24 » by RIPskaterdude » Sun May 24, 2015 5:55 pm

tbhawksfan1 wrote:Variation cutting Indy out:

Teague
#15
#59

for

#6
McLemore
Collison

Either side can be tweeked, say McL to Stauskas or variation on ATL picks


I wouldn't trade the #6 and Collison for Teague alone, so now the Kings are trading their starting SG for the 15th pick and a throw away 2nd rounder?
Image

Return to Trades and Transactions