Kings get: George/Monroe
Bucks get: Hill
Lakers get: DMC
Pacers get: Russell/Gay/Lakers pick
Why Kings - Decide to move on from DMC - Get a SF and C they can plug right in - Collison/?/George/WCS/Monroe
WHy Bucks - Get the PG they need - Hill/Middleotn/Giannis/Parker/Henosn
Why Lakers: Get DMC - ?/?/?/Randle/DMC
Why Pacers - Get young PG, high pick and someone that can fill George role - Ellis/Russell/Gay/Turner/Mahinmi(resign)
Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
- mlloyd10
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,733
- And1: 854
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 983
- And1: 155
- Joined: May 19, 2013
- Contact:
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
pick would have to be #1 for pacers to possibly consider and i dont think thats even enough for George. I dont think the Bucks could get Hill for Monroe for a straight swap. This would be a home run for the kings tho
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,243
- And1: 449
- Joined: Mar 31, 2010
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
Lakers cut SAC and MIL and trade Russell/1st for George.
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,996
- And1: 1,482
- Joined: Oct 08, 2003
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
LOL. Bucks steal value here, unloading Monroe for Hill. Nice try.
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,205
- And1: 1,532
- Joined: Jul 07, 2003
- Location: Indy
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
The Pacers wouldn't touch this.
Rather have DMC+ filler, or a beefier Laker's package for PG. Gay moves the needle in the opposite direction.
If I'm Indy I'd consider equal salaries such as Stuckey/Hill for Monroe.
Rather have DMC+ filler, or a beefier Laker's package for PG. Gay moves the needle in the opposite direction.
If I'm Indy I'd consider equal salaries such as Stuckey/Hill for Monroe.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 10,240
- And1: 6,623
- Joined: Jun 23, 2015
- Contact:
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,905
- And1: 10,573
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
Yea George is one of a handful of players I would trade Cousins for straight up.
Then I see Milwaukee getting in here and stealing value so I cut them out and gladly take Hill and George and go on my way. Then I realize that the Lakers are going to cut us out and take George for themselves lol. But if the Lakers think they have a deal in place for Durant maybe followed by Westbrook next year maybe they want a top 3 big man in the league to pair with those guys.
I'd try to sign Ryan Anderson and be happy as hell.
WCS/Koufos
Ryan Anderson/Casspi
George/Casspi
Hill/Bellineli
Collison/Curry
Shooting defense and Paul George haahaha.
Then I see Milwaukee getting in here and stealing value so I cut them out and gladly take Hill and George and go on my way. Then I realize that the Lakers are going to cut us out and take George for themselves lol. But if the Lakers think they have a deal in place for Durant maybe followed by Westbrook next year maybe they want a top 3 big man in the league to pair with those guys.
I'd try to sign Ryan Anderson and be happy as hell.
WCS/Koufos
Ryan Anderson/Casspi
George/Casspi
Hill/Bellineli
Collison/Curry
Shooting defense and Paul George haahaha.
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,069
- And1: 608
- Joined: Apr 29, 2016
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
1) Pick LAL would have to be #1 or #2. If not Pacers not even touch this
2) Lakers would not send #1(#2) + Russell for Cousins.
3) Nice try with Monroe and Hill Why :
3.1 Pacers when decided rebuild should take Rudy Gay?
3.2 Sacto when we have many better bigs this offseason on the table take Monroe contract?
This trade is nearly impossible, but be more realistic - even in this scenarious Bux have to take not G.Hill but package with Stuckey, Lou Williams or Nick Young. This is Monroe value
@Boneman2
Bird definitely send message last year that he want modern basketball so i cant see Monroe in Pacers.
2) Lakers would not send #1(#2) + Russell for Cousins.
3) Nice try with Monroe and Hill Why :
3.1 Pacers when decided rebuild should take Rudy Gay?
3.2 Sacto when we have many better bigs this offseason on the table take Monroe contract?
This trade is nearly impossible, but be more realistic - even in this scenarious Bux have to take not G.Hill but package with Stuckey, Lou Williams or Nick Young. This is Monroe value
@Boneman2
Bird definitely send message last year that he want modern basketball so i cant see Monroe in Pacers.
clyde21 wrote:sell high on Ingram, this is Zion's team now, there is no room for that black hole that is BI
clyde21 wrote:bench Ingram for NAW, already a better player
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,020
- And1: 1,478
- Joined: Sep 24, 2009
Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible
Kobe System wrote:Lakers cut SAC and MIL and trade Russell/1st for George.
Pretty much. Trading one of Russell or #1/#2 for DMC is risky enough, but they're not trading both of them.
Return to Trades and Transactions