Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

User avatar
mlloyd10
General Manager
Posts: 7,733
And1: 854
Joined: Jan 18, 2012
     

Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible 

Post#1 » by mlloyd10 » Thu May 5, 2016 3:09 pm

Kings get: George/Monroe
Bucks get: Hill
Lakers get: DMC
Pacers get: Russell/Gay/Lakers pick

Why Kings - Decide to move on from DMC - Get a SF and C they can plug right in - Collison/?/George/WCS/Monroe
WHy Bucks - Get the PG they need - Hill/Middleotn/Giannis/Parker/Henosn
Why Lakers: Get DMC - ?/?/?/Randle/DMC
Why Pacers - Get young PG, high pick and someone that can fill George role - Ellis/Russell/Gay/Turner/Mahinmi(resign)
Jwduff
Pro Prospect
Posts: 983
And1: 155
Joined: May 19, 2013
Contact:
     

Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible 

Post#2 » by Jwduff » Thu May 5, 2016 3:26 pm

pick would have to be #1 for pacers to possibly consider and i dont think thats even enough for George. I dont think the Bucks could get Hill for Monroe for a straight swap. This would be a home run for the kings tho
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible 

Post#3 » by Kobe System » Thu May 5, 2016 3:31 pm

Lakers cut SAC and MIL and trade Russell/1st for George.
winter_mute_13
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 1,482
Joined: Oct 08, 2003
 

Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible 

Post#4 » by winter_mute_13 » Thu May 5, 2016 4:18 pm

LOL. Bucks steal value here, unloading Monroe for Hill. Nice try.
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,205
And1: 1,532
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible 

Post#5 » by Boneman2 » Thu May 5, 2016 4:33 pm

The Pacers wouldn't touch this.

Rather have DMC+ filler, or a beefier Laker's package for PG. Gay moves the needle in the opposite direction.

If I'm Indy I'd consider equal salaries such as Stuckey/Hill for Monroe.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,240
And1: 6,623
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible 

Post#6 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu May 5, 2016 4:40 pm

How in the world do the Bucks turn Monroe into Hill?
Image
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 16,905
And1: 10,573
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible 

Post#7 » by LightTheBeam » Thu May 5, 2016 4:50 pm

Yea George is one of a handful of players I would trade Cousins for straight up.

Then I see Milwaukee getting in here and stealing value so I cut them out and gladly take Hill and George and go on my way. Then I realize that the Lakers are going to cut us out and take George for themselves lol. But if the Lakers think they have a deal in place for Durant maybe followed by Westbrook next year maybe they want a top 3 big man in the league to pair with those guys.

I'd try to sign Ryan Anderson and be happy as hell.

WCS/Koufos
Ryan Anderson/Casspi
George/Casspi
Hill/Bellineli
Collison/Curry

Shooting defense and Paul George haahaha.
yanuary
Rookie
Posts: 1,069
And1: 608
Joined: Apr 29, 2016
 

Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible 

Post#8 » by yanuary » Thu May 5, 2016 5:27 pm

1) Pick LAL would have to be #1 or #2. If not Pacers not even touch this
2) Lakers would not send #1(#2) + Russell for Cousins.
3) Nice try with Monroe and Hill ;) Why :
3.1 Pacers when decided rebuild should take Rudy Gay?
3.2 Sacto when we have many better bigs this offseason on the table take Monroe contract?

This trade is nearly impossible, but be more realistic - even in this scenarious Bux have to take not G.Hill but package with Stuckey, Lou Williams or Nick Young. This is Monroe value

@Boneman2
Bird definitely send message last year that he want modern basketball so i cant see Monroe in Pacers.
clyde21 wrote:sell high on Ingram, this is Zion's team now, there is no room for that black hole that is BI


clyde21 wrote:bench Ingram for NAW, already a better player
Karmaloop
General Manager
Posts: 9,020
And1: 1,478
Joined: Sep 24, 2009
       

Re: Huge- MIL/SAC/LAL/IND - Maybe possible 

Post#9 » by Karmaloop » Thu May 5, 2016 11:52 pm

Kobe System wrote:Lakers cut SAC and MIL and trade Russell/1st for George.


Pretty much. Trading one of Russell or #1/#2 for DMC is risky enough, but they're not trading both of them.

Return to Trades and Transactions