LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava)

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Grade the LA Clippers offseason

A
1
3%
A-
2
6%
B+
3
9%
B
5
15%
B-
7
21%
C+
3
9%
C
3
9%
C-
5
15%
D
3
9%
F
1
3%
 
Total votes: 33

HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#1 » by HartfordWhalers » Mon Aug 15, 2016 2:28 pm

LA Clippers Offseason


HartfordWhalers wrote:HartfordWhalers Review

Key Losses:
Cole Aldrich
Paul Pierce (maybe?)
Jeff Green

Jeff Green played 26.3 mpg. Paul Pierce 18.1mpg, and Cole Aldich 13.3mpg.

I listed them all as key loses (pending Pierce retirement), but the one that stuck out the most was the guy who played the least minutes Cole Aldrich. Now, I'm not sure I would pay the salary he got from Minnesota to play him that few minutes in LAC but he was still 5th in VORP on the entire Clippers roster. Somehow he was 4th among all centers in the league in RPM, which I try not to cite because I think it is mostly junk and the way its used is worse, but I'm going ahead and be guilty of doing just that here anyway with (more than a little) tongue in check self awareness. Cole Aldrich was the 4th best center in the entire league by RPM! And they replaced him with Speights, who is the 55th best. Talk about a huge downgrade!!!

Jeff Green is just a guy. But he isn't a negative guy, he is just a guy. When you have Deandre, Blake, Paul, Redick, having a competent just a guy to slot in next to them is great. That said, it isn't a huge loss, he is just a guy.

Paul Pierce is coming up on the deadline that his contract can be stretched. Look for him to get cut and stretched before September 1st. Why is he a key loss? He isn't. But if LAC hadn't overpaid their other guys so much (and blew assets on things like Jeff Green last season with nothing to show for it, or dumping salary the year before), then Paul Pierce's contract could be used in a trade to get some extra depth. Think 2m cash and a 2nd rounder for Kendall Marshall (fully ung) and Hollis Thompson, or that lotto protected pick that instead went to Memphis for Green to the Nets for Bogdanovic. I like the idea of 2 2nds and cash for Bogdanovic but don't know that the Nets do it versus waiting for better 2nds.

Losses:
Pablo Prigioni
CJ Wilcox
Jeff Ayres
Branden Dawson

I swear Branden Dawson looked really good in at least one summer league game once. Looking it up it was probably July 8th 2015 versus the Knicks when he had 18 points, 6 rebounds, 2 assists on 7-10 from the field and 4-5 from the ft line in just 25 minutes. I wish I hadn't seen that game, as my opinion of him is probably incredibly inflated as a result. Realistically nothing was lost in this area except the briefest of illusions that the Clippers had any youth worth a damn (Wilcox/Dawsen).

Draft:
#25 Brice Johnson
#39 David Michineau
#40 Diamond Stone

Not really what I had in mind here. I'm not seeing why Brice Johnson both as in why draft behind Blake and why draft him specifically. Skal Labissière, Dejounte Murray, Ivica Zubac or Deyonta Davis would all have made me happier, as they all are raw swings and I don't see Brice getting play for a year anyway so why go for an older less upside pick?

Michineau looks to be a poor 3 point shooter and doesn't get all that many assists, just going off his stats and Dx profile looks over drafted. Demetrius Jackson made a ton of sense and was passed up instead. Or Michael Gbinije as a poor man's Wes Johnson. Stone seems a fine pick.

Trades:
Cheick Diallo (33rd) to New Orleans Pelicans for the rights to David Michineau (39th) and Diamond Stone (40th).
C.J. Wilcox and cash (TBD) to Orlando Magic for Devyn Marble and a Cleveland Cavaliers’ 2020 second-rounder.

Don't mind the first trade at all, but disliked the Michineau pick. Second trade is basically salary dumping Wilcox, which isn't all that reassuring about the GM that picked him. Depending on the exact cash its not a bad trade, but handcuffing the cash available when you have given up so many assets already is a bad thing.

Free Agency:
Jamal Crawford 3/$42 m (30.5m gtd)
Wesley Johnson 3/$17.6m (PO last year)
Austin Rivers 3/$35.5m (PO last year)
Luc Mbah a Moute 2/$4.5m (PO last year)
Marreese Speights 2/$2.9m (PO last year)
Brandon Bass 1/$1,551,659m
Raymond Felton 1/$1,551,659m
Alan Anderson 1/$1,315,448m
Brice Johnson rookie scale
Diamond Stone 2/$1.4m

Clippers killed it on bargain basement vets. Besides GS, no one has done better, and that one is debatable. Speights, Bass, Felton, Anderson! Just an amazing haul. LRMM is a quality defender and can help with all those just a guy minutes Jeff Green left open. A year ago I was arguing that the Clippers should trade Lance for a 2 year contract because there was no way the Clippers would have cap room this past offseason. There was a lot of pushback that maybe everyone opted out, maybe Pierce retired, and maybe somehow they would have 8m in cap room and go that path instead of using Bird Rights and the MLE. As is, they went for a 1 year deal and have nothing to show for it but the lost 1st rounder; however the quality of bench guys they signed would make any cheap deal from last year not matter much.

Now... roughly 95m over 3 years to Crawford, Wes Johnson, and Austin Rivers? That is ugly poor management. I'm actually okay with Crawford signing as he does something (score) and the third year is mostly unguaranteed. Rivers is hellaciously overpaid, and when the best case description of him is a negative offensively and possibly not a negative defensively you just cannot pay him that much. Add in being the coach/gm's son, and having failed to be worth on the court time anywhere else and you have a contract that screams nepotism and incompetence.

As for Wes Johnson, I asked this elsewhere:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/j/johnswe01.html
Anyone look at his last 3 years of raw stats and see a guy who should have his RPM go like this:
2014: -4.37
2015: -0.80
2016: +0.93

His raw on offs are:
2014: -4.0
2015: 0
2016: -3.5

But he went from being a net negative on a horrible team to neutral on a horrible team to net negative on a good team. So, the RPM goes from massively negative to top 20 in the league at his position. Am I missing some Wes Johnson intangibles rapid development and then some to justify that magnitude of a change, or is this just a case of RPM being RPM-esque screwy? Someone feel free to convince me that Wes is an entirely different player now.

Combined with Aldrich, and the Clippers are a great argument for that RPM is giving out some really whacky readings which have a lot more to do with the lineups and team use of a player than the actual players.

Would the Clippers be worse than the -3.5 if they had Michael Gbinije as a poor man's Wes Johnson instead of Wes Johnson? Maybe, but not by much imo.

This is a contract that the creators of RPM might hail as one of the best deal's out there -- http://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/17259662/best-nba-free-agency-deals-2016-offseason (insider) -- but based off his RPM 2 years ago (when he was a very similar if not identical player) would have been one of the worst deals in the league.

Current Depth Chart: (as usual this is a rough draft taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Chris Paul, Raymond Felton
SG: J.J. Redick, Jamal Crawford, Austin Rivers
SF: Luc Mbah a Moute, Wesley Johnson, Alan Anderson
PF: Blake Griffin, Paul Pierce, Brandon Bass, Brice Johnson
C: DeAndre Jordan, Marreese Speights, Diamond Stone

I expect to hear some how Rivers should be backup pg instead of third string sg, but I'm keeping the bbinsiders depth chart anyway.

Needs: LRMM hitting the open corner 3 would be a thing of beauty for this team. It would make them deadly. Besides that, health.

Additional Thoughts: This is a really tough offseason to grade. The short term it is really really good off the cheap 1 year vets. But those are all short term, while in the long run they managed to over spend and not impress me with their draft. It would not surprise me if we both look at this offseason in May and think it was brilliant and in 2 years look back at this offseason as a giant series of mistakes.

Projected Win/Loss: 60-22 I had this at 58 earlier, and have been debating the 58-62 range all day. I finally went to an even 60, and I might revise this up when I tally up all my predictions. I'm bullish on the Clippers this season.

Off-Season Grade: B (Short term an A/A- and long term a D)


bondom34 wrote:bondom34 Review

Key Losses:
Cole Aldrich

Losses:
Pablo Prigioni
CJ Wilcox
Jeff Ayres
Branden Dawson
Paul Pierce
Jeff Green

I didn't' think Pierce or Green were key losses. Pierce was mostly awful on court and Green just isn't good in general.

Draft:
#25 Brice Johnson
#39 David Michineau
#40 Diamond Stone

Trades:
Cheick Diallo (33rd) to New Orleans Pelicans for the rights to David Michineau (39th) and Diamond Stone (40th).
C.J. Wilcox and cash (TBD) to Orlando Magic for Devyn Marble and a Cleveland Cavaliers’ 2020 second-rounder.

Free Agency:
Jamal Crawford 3/$42 m (30.5m gtd)
Wesley Johnson 3/$17.6m (PO last year)
Luc Mbah a Moute 2/$4.5m (PO last year)
Austin Rivers 3/$35.5m (PO last year)
Marreese Speights 2/$2.9m (PO last year)
Brandon Bass 1/$1,551,659m
Raymond Felton 1/$1,551,659m
Alan Anderson 1/$1,315,448m
Brice Johnson rookie scale
Diamond Stone 2/$1.4m

Current Depth Chart: (as usual this is a rough draft taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Chris Paul, Raymond Felton
SG: J.J. Redick, Jamal Crawford, Austin Rivers
SF: Luc Mbah a Moute, Wesley Johnson, Alan Anderson
PF: Blake Griffin, Brandon Bass, Paul Pierce, Brice Johnson
C: DeAndre Jordan, Marreese Speights, Diamond Stone

Needs:
An upgrade at 3 would be nice, an some depth pretty much all around, especially at PG and PF.
Additional Thoughts:
I kind of think they make a leap this year, they didn't do much but have had injury problems the last few years. I've voted them 2nd in the west but here have them 3rd, could see either but I think they end up in the WCF this season. I can't grade them terribly well because they really didn't do much, but most of it was good. The Crawford and Rivers contracts drag the grade down but the rest was solid to above average, I'm pretty high on them.
Projected Win/Loss:
55-27
Off-Season Grade: C+


dbrandon wrote:dbrandon Review

Key Losses:
Cole Aldrich
Jeff Green

Cole Aldrich is actually going to be a decent loss for them. Picking up Speights helps, but he's reeeaaaalllly not a good defender. Aldrich is decent, and he gives you enough offensive game when he's on the floor.

Green is not going to light the world on fire, but he's a competent wing on a team that's lacking them.

Losses:
Pablo Prigioni
CJ Wilcox
Jeff Ayres
Branden Dawson
Paul Pierce

None of these guys are difference-makers at this point.

Draft:
#25 Brice Johnson
#39 David Michineau
#40 Diamond Stone

I'd agree with HW here that outside of Stone, the draft doesn't seem to make a ton of sense. But it's the Clippers—it's not like they're going to use their young guys anyway.

Trades:
Cheick Diallo (33rd) to New Orleans Pelicans for the rights to David Michineau (39th) and Diamond Stone (40th).
C.J. Wilcox and cash (TBD) to Orlando Magic for Devyn Marble and a Cleveland Cavaliers’ 2020 second-rounder.

1st is fine, though if it were me I'd have held onto the pick and taken another guy (McCaw?)

2nd trade is...ehhhhhhh. It's fine I guess. Using the cash seems like a bit of a waste to me.

Free Agency:
Jamal Crawford 3/$42 m (30.5m gtd)
Wesley Johnson 3/$17.6m (PO last year)
Austin Rivers 3/$35.5m (PO last year)
Luc Mbah a Moute 2/$4.5m (PO last year)
Marreese Speights 2/$2.9m (PO last year)
Brandon Bass 1/$1,551,659m
Raymond Felton 1/$1,551,659m
Alan Anderson 1/$1,315,448m
Brice Johnson rookie scale
Diamond Stone 2/$1.4m

Bad first: Crawford, Rivers, and Johnson are horrendously overpaid. Craw can score at least, but Wes is a pretty average to below-average swingman and Rivers is...Rivers. Yes, he's a decent enough defender. Streaky is the nice way to describe his impact on the offensive end, though.

There's no way to justify any of those 3 contracts IMO. Who are you bidding against for Austin, Doc? Fenerbahce? Guangdong?

On the plus side, Mbah a Moute, Speights, Bass, Felton, and Anderson are all excellent value signings. Solid vets.

Current Depth Chart: (as usual this is a rough draft taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Chris Paul, Raymond Felton
SG: J.J. Redick, Jamal Crawford, Austin Rivers
SF: Luc Mbah a Moute, Wesley Johnson, Alan Anderson
PF: Blake Griffin, Paul Pierce, Brandon Bass, Brice Johnson
C: DeAndre Jordan, Marreese Speights, Diamond Stone

This actually isn't a bad depth chart for their cap situation.

Needs: Stay healthy. Don't get snakebit in the playoffs. Mbah a Moute needs to hit the 3. Speights needs to prove he's capable of producing when given a slightly longer leash.

Additional Thoughts: I like the value signings, but I HATE that Doc handcuffed them to Jamal, Wes and Austin and sacrificed any hope of not being capped out forever—at least, unless one of Blake or CP3 walks next year.

It's a good team. Is it good enough to finally get over the hump? IDK.

Projected Win/Loss: 62 wins

Off-Season Grade: B-

I would go higher, but their cap is a real problem.


Slava wrote:Slava Review

Losses:
Cole Aldrich
Paul Pierce
Jeff Green
Pablo Prigioni
CJ Wilcox
Jeff Ayres
Branden Dawson

Outside their starting 4, no one was really vital to this team and Pierce was not the answer at SF. Jeff Green had a real chance to make a home here backing up both the 3 and 4 spots but add this to the list of teams he has disappointed in his career. Aldrich easily outplayed his minimum deal last season but I feel they upgraded with the Brandon Bass acquisition.

Draft:
#25 Brice Johnson
#39 David Michineau
#40 Diamond Stone

I liked Johnson at the NCAA level and he had a nice tourney but his lack of strength or prototypical size will hold him back from being effective in the same manner as he did in college on both ends of the floor. Still he is a very fluid athlete who can look good on offense if he gains any minutes alongside Chris Paul or just affect games in spot minutes by being aggressive on the boards.

Stone stands to lose some weight to get in NBA shape but he's still too raw to receive any game time from Rivers, not to mention DeAndre is very durable so they might just go with a 4 big rotation with Speights and Bass backing up Jordan and Griffin.

Trades:
Cheick Diallo (33rd) to New Orleans Pelicans for the rights to David Michineau (39th) and Diamond Stone (40th).
C.J. Wilcox and cash (TBD) to Orlando Magic for Devyn Marble and a Cleveland Cavaliers’ 2020 second-rounder.

The Diallo trade makes little sense, especially because I thought they should have picked Demetrius Jackson at that spot who could have made a real difference to their second unit with his athleticism and speed. I have a hard time imagining Doc Rivers scouted an obscure French dude like Michineau well enough to make this trade.

Free Agency:
Jamal Crawford 3/$42 m (30.5m gtd)
Wesley Johnson 3/$17.6m (PO last year)
Luc Mbah a Moute 2/$4.5m (PO last year)
Austin Rivers 3/$35.5m (PO last year)
Marreese Speights 2/$2.9m (PO last year)
Brandon Bass 1/$1,551,659m
Raymond Felton 1/$1,551,659m
Alan Anderson 1/$1,315,448m
Brice Johnson rookie scale
Diamond Stone 2/$1.4m

There wasn't much room for the Clippers to do anything radical unless they were looking to break up the main core, which they still may do leading up the trade deadline so the acquisitions of Mbah a Moute, Speights, Bass and Felton for what they paid was good. Bass especially will be a very steady presence with a blue collar work ethic and professionalism.

You just know Rivers Jr and Crawford were going to get paid so there's no point analyzing them although neither player will particularly help improve their perimeter defense.

Somehow Wes Johnson also got more than a minimum deal doing nothing more than he has usually done in his career, which is being firmly below average.

These last three deals are just short sighted considering the summer they have coming up after this season (more on this later).

Current Depth Chart: (as usual this is a rough draft taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Chris Paul, Raymond Felton
SG: J.J. Redick, Jamal Crawford, Austin Rivers
SF: Luc Mbah a Moute, Wesley Johnson, Alan Anderson
PF: Blake Griffin, Paul Pierce, Brandon Bass, Brice Johnson
C: DeAndre Jordan, Marreese Speights, Diamond Stone

Needs:

1. Good health for Griffin and Paul
2. A new GM who will firmly relegate Rivers to coaching.

Additional Thoughts:

This is a crucial year for the Clippers, considering that both Blake and Chris Paul can/will very likely opt out and even if they were to both return, they will sign big deals under the new salary cap making their already minute ability to make additions even harder to do next summer, not to mention Redick is a free agent who will also like to get paid.

I think they have to find a trade for Blake Griffin as he is likely the one to net the highest return and they can fill the PF spot quite easily while adding a plus defender at the SF spot (you know what I'm doing here) and may be wriggle out a pick or three in the process. The offense seems to hum along quite nicely around the CP3-DeAndre pick and roll, so they have to upgrade swingman defense to give themselves a genuine chance of making the finals and more.

As it stands there isn't anything particular different or exciting about them this season as compared to the past three. This is the same team albeit a year older, their issues will not get resolved with what is largely an unchanged roster, so the best they can do is hope for an untimely injury (or may be it might take two) to someone key on Golden State so they can have a chance at a finals appearance, which they probably deserve just for their sheer talent.

Right now I have them as my second seed in the West and the third best team in the league owing mainly to the synergy of Jordan/Griffin/Redick/Paul and the Spurs/OKC not having the best off-seasons.

In the end, this is what you get with Doc Rivers, unimaginative and afraid to take a chance to go a tier higher and perfectly content to maintain the status quo.

Projected Win/Loss: 59-23, WC Finals

Off-Season Grade: B-
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#2 » by loserX » Mon Aug 15, 2016 4:21 pm

Best move: filling out the bench. They landed Speights, Bass, Felton and Anderson for less than $6M AAV. That's less than Ish Smith is getting. More importantly, they get to land these guys because they are now a prestige franchise and a possible contender year after year, and it's been a very long time since the Clippers could say that (ever?). Picking up young size in the draft was wise also.

Worst move: that FA package also cost slightly more than HALF of what Austin Rivers is making next year, and the two years after that. This is why Doc the coach loses so much admiration by being Doc the GM. At least Jamal Crawford has some cachet.

This is a very good basketball team, and they didn't really have to do very much but get healthy and add some cheap depth. Hopefully they've done both.

Basically I liked the signings from other teams but not so much the signings from their own team. They also *still* don't have a legit SF but to be fair their options were fairly limited.

Will go B for generally doing what they could and then throwing extra money away on their own guys.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#3 » by loserX » Mon Aug 15, 2016 4:22 pm

(And want to reiterate that these are great. I like to see the opinions, and better still to have all the information in one place so I don't have to look it up 30 times :) )
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,244
And1: 97,957
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#4 » by Texas Chuck » Mon Aug 15, 2016 4:44 pm

Min contracts look great. Tho I thought the same thing last summer with them and it didn't pan out quite that well--I think the lesson is min guys are typically min guys for a reason. But despite that, I still really like these.

I am curious if the organization seriously thought about a Blake Griffin deal. I think the team without him is a top 4 team in the West--and probably closer to 2 or 3 with the losses the Thunder and Spurs have had this off-season. I think there might be opportunity to use his value to address some other needs/depth. That said, he's a very talented player and his value is probably near a nadir with the injury, the punch, and the contract. So keeping him might be the best.

I would have chosen Green over Rivers/Johnson particularly knowing he'd take a one year deal leaving me more flexibility if Griffin and/or Paul leave next summer. Plus he's just a better player.

But this is a good team, they didn't have many options, and I think their depth is slightly improved. That's worth a B. Long-term money to players not worth it knocks this down to a C or C- for me. I think HW summed it up well. For this year I think these moves look pretty good. Next summer I think the Clippers are going to be handcuffed by some of these contracts and its really going to hurt.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,844
And1: 15,040
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#5 » by Laimbeer » Mon Aug 15, 2016 5:12 pm

C-

The bargain contracts don't offset the absolute awfulness of Crawford, Johnson and Rivers. Stunning to think they'll have about a third of their cap tied up in those guys for three years. Hell, ought to be a D+.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
gom
Heat forum: Expert Predictor
Posts: 18,591
And1: 42,673
Joined: May 30, 2014
Location: Earth-616
   

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#6 » by gom » Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:05 pm

First, the draft:

Brice Johnson at 25 was a very solid pick. A senior, he is a better known quantity than taking a chance on Korkmaz, Labissiere, or Zubac. If Luwawu were still on the board (he wasn't), I might have chosen him instead. Yabusele would have been a good pick too in this range, but Boston already snagged him much earlier. Yes, Johnson plays a position that is already well-stocked for the Clippers, but he is going to be brought into the team slowly. They took best player available, and clearly took Johnson's Tar Heel leadership qualities into account. I think it's a good thing.

I also think that Michineau + Stone are much better than Diallo, who almost didn't play for Kansas. Micheneau is a good-sized European point guard who is a bit turnover prone, but plays hard and has very good athleticism. I saw Stone play a couple times for Maryland and really looks - with proper training, obviously - like he could dominate the front court. I think he's only 19 or 20 years old, so there's time to improve. Between him and Diallo, Stone is a safe bet to be at least a backup big, while Diallo is the unknown quantity with possibly high potential, but probably not. Getting a chance on Michineau is a bonus, but I would have taken Paul ZIpser instead.

I like the signings of Bass, Speights, Anderson, Mbah a Moute, & Felton. Great depth for the bench. Really smart moves.

Signing Crawford to a 3 year deal looked excessive (I just saw that the last year is partially guaranteed, so it's not). He's a vital part of the Clipper rotation.

I am not too excited about Johnson and Rivers, but believe that Rivers (nepotism aside) is probably a fair deal at 3/35.

Clippers at least held their own and are actually better. Whether that makes a difference after the Warriors got KD is another matter, but at least they tried, right?

B
Image
I remember 11-30 with these guys. ^
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#7 » by nickhx2 » Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:15 pm

Losing cole was a not fun but expected. the dude is seriously good.

Brice was an ok pick at the time but if you're gonna sign brandon bass and speights and you already have jordan/blake starting then what is the point? I'd agree with assessments saying they should have gone longer term. Didn't like the draft at all in that aspect. I actually was very much looking forward to the draft and mostly disappointed.

Getting rid of jeff green was like one of the best days of my clipper fandom life... until we resigned jamal crawford for 3 years. Would have way rather had green's mediocre as all hell ass for the 3/49(?) crawford got and i detested jeff green every single day he was with the clips.

On rivers: I find it peculiar how so many non-clipper fans like to equate austin rivers's deal to crawford's horrendous one and that's just not how it is. How can people say "well at least jamal crawford scores" when he actually sucks at that, sucks at defense, sucks at rebounding, and sucks the life out of the team on the court? And conversely austin rivers actually provides a good defensive presence and is the more efficient player on offense? Anyway the rivers stuff has been repeated to the point of nauseum so it seems like a silly idea to get back into it. I'll just say as nicely as possible that you would find a stark contrast among most clipper fans if you brought up the rivers deal as being bad or equivalent to jamal crawford's.

As far as the rest of the stuff, getting mbah a moute back for the BAE and getting all those other dudes for VM's was pretty good. I like wes being back even though he was off and on, as i believe with some consistent playing time he'll be able to really find himself with the team.

Can't say that i was overall happy with the offseason, but honestly the team just wanted to not do anything dumb like trading blake, and get/keep some decent reinforcements, which they did.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,244
And1: 97,957
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#8 » by Texas Chuck » Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:10 pm

nickhx2 wrote:. How can people say "well at least jamal crawford scores" when he actually sucks at that, sucks at defense, sucks at rebounding, and sucks the life out of the team on the court? And conversely austin rivers actually provides a good defensive presence and is the more efficient player on offense?



Curious how you are measuring efficiency? Because TS% is widely considered the most accurate way to measure it and they were very close to each other last year with Jamal having a slight edge and of course Rivers was 40 points over his career numbers while Jamal was right in line with what he's always been. And even when we break it down further, we see that Jamal is a far superior FT shooter with a superior draw rate, shoots better from the 2 and the 3.

Maybe I'm missing something here tho?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
DocRI
Starter
Posts: 2,126
And1: 764
Joined: Jun 17, 2010

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#9 » by DocRI » Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:57 pm

I went C+ here. As has already been said, those cheap vet signings were awesome. As has also already been said, the contracts they gave Crawford and Rivers (and, to a lesser extent, Johnson) were equally un-awesome. But really, what else were they gonna do? If healthy, they're a top 5-6 team in the entire league and one of the few franchises with legit championship aspirations (and maybe that extra veteran depth will mean less minutes for the stars and better health?). They were kinda painted into a corner, and so while I won't kill them for acting accordingly, that's still not a position one ever wants to be in. I don't hate what they did, but this is about grading the offseason and I'm not gonna reward them with a high grade when they spent that much long-term money on questionable bench players, one of whom's contract will overlap with his AARP membership.
RexRyan
Rookie
Posts: 1,086
And1: 408
Joined: Oct 30, 2014

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#10 » by RexRyan » Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:03 pm

I went with a B - they added some decent vets with cheap contracts. The window is now, and they know it.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#11 » by nickhx2 » Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:05 pm

was looking at TS/EFG for the season and post ASG, though post-ASG i would weight as far more accurate as both players were on their own planet of suckiness to start the season.

jamal crawford full season:
EFG: 46.6%
TS: 52.9%

post ASG
EFG: 48.8%
TS: 54.3%
usage: 25.3%

rivers full season:
EFG: 49.8%
TS: 52.3

post ASG
EFG: 52.0%
TS: 55.0%
usage 21.7%
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#12 » by nickhx2 » Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:14 pm

but let's be real anyone with two eyes doesn't need advanced stats to see that jamal crawford trying to play 1v5 when jj/blake/cp3 are standing still wide open makes you a sh**stain on the court.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#13 » by HartfordWhalers » Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:25 pm

nickhx2 wrote:but let's be real anyone with two eyes doesn't need advanced stats to see that jamal crawford trying to play 1v5 when jj/blake/cp3 are standing still wide open makes you a sh**stain on the court.


Well, if we are going off that criteria...

Clippers with Crawford on the court: -6.2 net rating worse than him off the court
Clippers with Rivers on the court:-13.2 net rating worse than him off the court

Looks to me like anyone with even one eye should see the Clippers are a hot mess with Rivers on the court.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,244
And1: 97,957
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#14 » by Texas Chuck » Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:42 pm

nickhx2 wrote:was looking at TS/EFG for the season and post ASG, though post-ASG i would weight as far more accurate as both players were on their own planet of suckiness to start the season.

jamal crawford full season:
EFG: 46.6%
TS: 52.9%

post ASG
EFG: 48.8%
TS: 54.3%
usage: 25.3%

rivers full season:
EFG: 49.8%
TS: 52.3

post ASG
EFG: 52.0%
TS: 55.0%
usage 21.7%



Appreciate the response.

I'd just say that even with this smaller sample size, I wouldn't be comfortable calling Rivers more efficient than Crawford. 55 vs 54.3 is essentially a dead heat. And using eFG just erases Crawford's massive FT shooting advantage which I wouldn't be comfortable using since that's absolutely a part of efficiency. When you think about the kings of efficiency like Harden and Durant their FT percentages and draw rate are a big part of what set them apart.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,581
And1: 7,635
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#15 » by jayjaysee » Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:04 pm

How does the same GM get those min contracts and give those other contracts. It still doesn't make sense to me.

I agree with Chuck I'd have kept Green over any two of Wes/Crawford/Rivers, he didn't list Crawford with those two but I would. Passive Green is fine for what they need and the one year deal would have been big if they need to redo the roster next offseason.

I think the quality signings make up for the ugly ones this season, so blinders it was a really good offseason.. This season I think it's a solid A but lasting effect is more a C-.
User avatar
QRich3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,844
And1: 3,947
Joined: Apr 03, 2011
 

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#16 » by QRich3 » Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:29 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
nickhx2 wrote:but let's be real anyone with two eyes doesn't need advanced stats to see that jamal crawford trying to play 1v5 when jj/blake/cp3 are standing still wide open makes you a sh**stain on the court.


Well, if we are going off that criteria...

Clippers with Crawford on the court: -6.2 net rating worse than him off the court
Clippers with Rivers on the court:-13.2 net rating worse than him off the court

Looks to me like anyone with even one eye should see the Clippers are a hot mess with Rivers on the court.

We've been through this in so many threads here that it seems silly to keep making the same points, but that's obviously what happens when Crawford plays half his time with the starters and Austin doesn't get any run with them. In a team where the difference in performance from the starters (more like the 4 best guys) and the bench is the biggest in recent memory. Not sure how showing net rating just like that proves what you think it does. Again, no point to keep rehashing the same conversations over and over, but as nick says, you'll have a hard time finding people who follow the Clippers closely and thinks higher of Crawford than Austin, or their contracts. My problem with Austin's contract personally, is that it's too short, and if you're gonna gamble and invest that capspace on him, you better lock him up for 4 years, so if/when he keeps developing you don't have to face the choice of giving him a bigger contract or let him go.

It's a bit odd to see people think of Wes' contract as a bad contract too, thought that one was pretty fair considering the kind of players around that price this offseason (Ellington, Sessions, Nicholson, Jennings, etc.). I don't think they'd have a problem dumping him for capspace if needed.

For me the two things that make the offseason bad are keeping Jamal and letting Aldrich go. Aldrich was pretty hard to avoid, and it seems like they tried to make Jamal go away as hard as they could, but in the end they folded under the other players pressure to keep him and the idea of going for one more try with the same core. The minimum signings are nice, specially Bass who I think could be a better version of Aldrich. Speights they could have spared, and I think he'll be out of the rotation some time during the season, but I get the signing when they didn't know they had the chance to get Bass. Felton is good too, and would be a lot better if Crawford wasn't there and Austin played full time SG off the bench. Keeping Luc was necessary, so spending the BAE on him is great.

The draft, I did not like at all. Johnson wasn't my first choice or close to it, but he could be ok. But most of my draft board was guys picked just after the 2nd round pick they traded. Passing on the defensive upside of Diallo or Onuaku, or the good fit/decent floor of wings like Brogdon and McCaw was awful, specially when they went for an offense-only C like Stone. Machineau, I have no clue about him, so I give him the benefit of the doubt.

Texas Chuck wrote:[I'd just say that even with this smaller sample size, I wouldn't be comfortable calling Rivers more efficient than Crawford. 55 vs 54.3 is essentially a dead heat. And using eFG just erases Crawford's massive FT shooting advantage which I wouldn't be comfortable using since that's absolutely a part of efficiency. When you think about the kings of efficiency like Harden and Durant their FT percentages and draw rate are a big part of what set them apart.

Austin started the season shooting 25% from 3 in November and December (for context, the Clippers as a whole were playing a lot worse in most areas and shot 2.2% worse from 3 than they did the rest of the season, as a team). After that, Austin shot 39,6% from 3 the rest of the season (while increasing volume 55%). Now you can think one is a hot streak and the other isn't, or that one's a cold streak and the other's not, or somewhere in between. But in any case, taking his whole-season number as if that's his fixated "efficiency" number doesn't seem fair for a 23 year old. Meanwhile, Jamal has been hovering around 35% from 3, for a TS% of about 53%, during his whole 16 year career. I'm all for using numbers to evaluate players, but it seems that Austin is a guy that a lot of people is having trouble to project further than his past numbers, while that doesn't seem to happen with other players his age, from what I see here.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#17 » by nickhx2 » Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:40 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
nickhx2 wrote:but let's be real anyone with two eyes doesn't need advanced stats to see that jamal crawford trying to play 1v5 when jj/blake/cp3 are standing still wide open makes you a sh**stain on the court.


Well, if we are going off that criteria...

Clippers with Crawford on the court: -6.2 net rating worse than him off the court
Clippers with Rivers on the court:-13.2 net rating worse than him off the court

Looks to me like anyone with even one eye should see the Clippers are a hot mess with Rivers on the court.


shouldn't the one eye see that jamal crawford gets to play with the starters in significant minutes while rivers doesn't?

no? that's not a thing?
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#18 » by nickhx2 » Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:58 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
nickhx2 wrote:was looking at TS/EFG for the season and post ASG, though post-ASG i would weight as far more accurate as both players were on their own planet of suckiness to start the season.

jamal crawford full season:
EFG: 46.6%
TS: 52.9%

post ASG
EFG: 48.8%
TS: 54.3%
usage: 25.3%

rivers full season:
EFG: 49.8%
TS: 52.3

post ASG
EFG: 52.0%
TS: 55.0%
usage 21.7%



Appreciate the response.

I'd just say that even with this smaller sample size, I wouldn't be comfortable calling Rivers more efficient than Crawford. 55 vs 54.3 is essentially a dead heat. And using eFG just erases Crawford's massive FT shooting advantage which I wouldn't be comfortable using since that's absolutely a part of efficiency. When you think about the kings of efficiency like Harden and Durant their FT percentages and draw rate are a big part of what set them apart.


you are welcome.

i think a season long sample size is plenty good enough. but let's look at big picture in case you still disagree.

crawford has long been a poor playoff performer and looking at his stats over the past few years he has been steadily declining.

meanwhile, austin rivers has been getting better. so even if you feel their efficiency stats are about the same i think it's logical to expect the one who's 24 to get better and the one who's 36 to get worse.

and yeah i get your point about efg but that is why i included ts. but those are just shooting percentages and with those stats we're not actually factoring on the court impact of jamal crawford hijacking offenses to play 1v5.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#19 » by HartfordWhalers » Mon Aug 15, 2016 10:02 pm

QRich3 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
nickhx2 wrote:but let's be real anyone with two eyes doesn't need advanced stats to see that jamal crawford trying to play 1v5 when jj/blake/cp3 are standing still wide open makes you a sh**stain on the court.


Well, if we are going off that criteria...

Clippers with Crawford on the court: -6.2 net rating worse than him off the court
Clippers with Rivers on the court:-13.2 net rating worse than him off the court

Looks to me like anyone with even one eye should see the Clippers are a hot mess with Rivers on the court.

We've been through this in so many threads here that it seems silly to keep making the same points, but that's obviously what happens when Crawford plays half his time with the starters and Austin doesn't get any run with them. In a team where the difference in performance from the starters (more like the 4 best guys) and the bench is the biggest in recent memory. Not sure how showing net rating just like that proves what you think it does. Again, no point to keep rehashing the same conversations over and over, but as nick says, you'll have a hard time finding people who follow the Clippers closely and thinks higher of Crawford than Austin, or their contracts. My problem with Austin's contract personally, is that it's too short, and if you're gonna gamble and invest that capspace on him, you better lock him up for 4 years, so if/when he keeps developing you don't have to face the choice of giving him a bigger contract or let him go.


nickhx2 wrote:shouldn't the one eye see that jamal crawford gets to play with the starters in significant minutes while rivers doesn't?

no? that's not a thing?


Clippers net rating with Rivers and no Paul or Blake: -7.6 pp 100 possessions
Clippers net rating with Crawford and no Paul or Blake: -5.7 pp 100 possessions

Same holds if you add in Deandre as well. Clippers without their stars are still worse with Rivers than with Crawford.

In short, you both are factually wrong on this.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,244
And1: 97,957
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: LA Clippers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#20 » by Texas Chuck » Mon Aug 15, 2016 10:03 pm

@Qrich,

I made no comments about future performance really. I was simply pointing out that at this point I don't believe Austin is more efficient. I'll admit I'm skeptical about his future efficiency because of the huge jump last year, and according to you and Nick, mostly just the 2nd half. I don't know if that's a small sample size hot streak or the evolution of him as a player.

But rest assured if its the latter, I will have no problems at all coming back and giving him credit for his improvement as a player. Just like if he reverts back to his career numbers, you will come back and acknowledge that.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.

Return to Trades and Transactions