Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava)

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Grade the LAL offseason

A
3
4%
A-
0
No votes
B+
3
4%
B
7
10%
B-
2
3%
C+
8
11%
C
8
11%
C-
8
11%
D
13
18%
F
19
27%
 
Total votes: 71

HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#1 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Aug 24, 2016 2:38 pm

Los Angeles Lakers Offseason Review

HartfordWhalers wrote:HartfordWhalers Review

Key Losses:
Kobe Bryant

If there was any doubt the Lakers had entered a new era, seeing this written should make it clear.

Losses:
Byron Scott (Head Coach)
Roy Hibbert
Brandon Bass
Ryan Kelly
Robert Sacre
Metta World Peace

In general, I try and discuss a guy or two even if none aren't worth it. Ryan Kelly was born too soon. If he had his rookie year last year -- 8ppg in 22 minutes on a 55% TS%, he would have a 3years/18million contract. Instead, he parlayed it into 2 years/ 3.4m and promptly faded as fast as Landry Fields did in Toronto. What happened? Was he just never good and hit some open shots? Speaking of fading, what happened to Hibbert? :( Whatever it is, none of these guys had anything left, and that includes Scott as a coach.

Draft:
#2 Brandon Ingram
#32 Ivica Zubac

Great draft. Getting Simmons would have fit better, but Ingram is a legit stud of a prospect, and Zubac is a quality pick at #32. This draft was absolutely nailed, and will do a ton to set up the Lakers future. In fact, I would take Ingram and Zubac over everything else the lakers have combined (Russell/Clarkson/Randle/Nance/Lou/whatever they spent a bazillion dollars on in free agency/those we have Upshaw who has top 5 talent t-shirts)

So, I should probably take this time to say a little about how I grade. I've heard some people say they grade based upon -- Did a team get better next year / did a team get better in the future. Thats perfectly fine. But that is not how I grade.

I grade based upon:
1) Did the team do better or worse than they should have given the circumstances?
Picking a top 8 prospect at pick #3 still makes you better in the short and long run, but it sure isn't doing the best you could. When half of your team is up for big raises and free agents like Charlotte, you will not be able to bring back everyone and shouldn't be graded like that was a realistic expectation.
2) Did the team focus its energy in the right direction?
Swimming faster than expected in the wrong direction might be better than expected at speed, but not actually good. If the Nets got Mozgov on a cheaper than expected great contract, I would still be questioning why they targeted an aging vet at the position of their most talented player. You need to have a logical plan for the big picture.
3) Is there something incomplete that needed to be addressed but wasn't? Are the individual steps compatible?
This is really part of 2 above, but it is important enough to pull it out as a third point of grading.

Some examples:
Miami got worse. But they picked the right direction -- keep Whiteside, Johnson, and as much future cap flexibility as possible. And they fully executed that direction. I gave them top marks even if their short term prospects look dimmer.

Orlando decided to push all in on winning now, and gave up slightly more than expected in the Ibaka-Oladipo trade (and the Meeks trade, and the Jeff Green signing). Value wise maybe it was a C to me, but directionally fitting in Ibaka with Vucevik looks like an A of a plan. They knew they were drifting into the 10-16 drafting range and needed to fix their core with the perfect support players, while hoping for a breakout from Gordon or someone else? However, the win now push failed to address the big pg issue, and I'm not sold on Biyombo and Ibaka fitting together either. I loved the direction of their big moves, but the fit and attention to the whole picture pulled the grade back down for me to a C+.

So, the Lakers absolutely had a draft that will (hopefully) do a lot for the franchise going forward. But most of that was expected once the lotto balls said they had the guy left over of Simmons/Ingram, and I'm not going to pat them on the head for that.

Trades:
Calderon with 2018 Denver 2nd and 2019 Chicago 2nd for cap space and the rights to Ater Majok

A solid trade for a rebuilding team. Gets a stopgap vet and 2 2nds. I like this trade a lot. Supposedly Philly was in the running for this trade, and I might hold not getting it against them. After all, I eep hearing how everyone likes dealing with Colangelo!

Free Agency:
Luke Walton (Head Coach)
Luol Deng 4/$72m
Timofey Mozgov 4/$64m
Jordan Clarkson 4/$50m
Marcelo Huertas 2/3m (last year ungtd)
Ivica Zubac 3/3.2m (last year ungtd)
Yi Jianlian 1/8m (250k gtd, 1.2m base salary, 2.3m bonus each at playing 20/40/59 games)
Brandon Ingram rookie scale
Not official yet:
Tarik Black 2/$12.8m (last year may be ungtd?)

Oh boy. So, you are the Lakers. You have:
PG: Jordan Clarkson, Jose Calderon
SG: D’Angelo Russell, Lou Williams
SF: Anthony Brown, Nick Young
PF: Julius Randle, Larry Nance Jr.
C: Ivica Zubac
(Yes, I have Clarkson at PG and Russell at SG)

And boatloads of cap space. What do you do?

Target the best possible young center and forwards to grow with that core, keeping the flexibility to snag in free agency a disgruntled Westbrook or Blake or Cousins in 2 years or whoever is next.

And by the way, if you are the worst team in the league and go from paying off a top 5 pick in '17 and a top 10 pick in '19 to owing just a top 5 pick in '18 it is a huge win. Increase those odds and be terrible if it doesn't get you a stud to grow with. This extra unprotected pick to Orlando is a huge thing.

Looking at who is out there, I would say the following:
Biyombo perhaps should have been signed even at his high price range, depends what else you do.
Christian Wood should have been signed.
Terrence Jones should have been signed.
Sullinger should have been signed.
Motie pending his health.
Afflalo (or even Henderson) on their only gtd 1 year deals would make sense for then looking to flip them and helping stabilize the locker room (I know I picked a bunch of knuckleheads above). Both could play sf in theory.
Festus Ezeli on his 1+ ungtd 1 was worth a stab.
Boban.

Instead, a fortune was spent on Deng and Mozgov, pushing the Lakers closer to losing their pick in '17 and then '19 while hampering their ability to sign a free agent stud and not actually making the team even good. Ugh. What a massive massive fail of direction. And execution on that Movgov contract.

The Yi stuff just strikes me as silly, Huertas is Calderon, why does anyone need two of him?

Walton is a great get but, the part of Walton that feels a great get is his ability to make LAL seem attractive going forward to free agents. And meanwhile that door got half way slammed shut for no reason.

Current Depth Chart: (as usual this is a rough draft taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Jordan Clarkson, Jose Calderon, Marcelo Huertas
SG: D’Angelo Russell, Lou Williams
SF: Luol Deng, Anthony Brown, Nick Young
PF: Julius Randle, Larry Nance Jr., Yi Jianlian
C: Timofey Mozgov, Tarik Black, Ivica Zubac

Needs:
A mulligan on this offseason's free agency.

Additional Thoughts:
There are two long standing Laker debates I have been involved in that I can think of offhand. First, that Russell is really more of a sg (Harden ball dominant type) versus a pg. Second, that Clarkson would eventually overtake Randle in trade value. That one is going on 2 years and I'm curious where it stands now with Clarkson's new contract. So tell me, how much more is Randle worth than Clarkson at this point?

Oh, and my trade idea: Lou Williams and 2017 LAL 2nd for Deyonta Davis and VC once Gasol is back. Gets Memphis some more win now talent and a 2nd as high as Davis was picked at, while the Lakers get a smidge of cap flexibility and a guy that shouldn't have fallen that far.
Or: Randle, Deng and 2017 LAL 2nd for Rubio and Pekovic Yep, that one should anger everyone. :(

Projected Win/Loss: 26-56 You have to expect this team to fade hard down the stretch given their situation.

Off-Season Grade: F I could have wavered. After all, perhaps a D- is justified. Zubac was a great pick, Walton was a great hire, they had some moments. But the whole thing was an example in destroying value and potential future value so much that I'm just sticking with my F. If I am a Laker fan I'm thinking that it is both the best of times (Ingram/Walton) and the worst of times (free agency), only all the worst of times could have been avoided and are self inflicted wounds.


bondom34 wrote:bondom34 Review

Key Losses:
Kobe Bryant

Losses:
Byron Scott (Head Coach)
Roy Hibbert
Brandon Bass
Ryan Kelly
Robert Sacre
Metta World Peace

Draft:
#2 Brandon Ingram
#32 Ivica Zubac

Trades:
Calderon with 2018 Denver 2nd and 2019 Chicago 2nd for cap space and the rights to Ater Majok

Free Agency:
Luke Walton (Head Coach)
Luol Deng 4/$72m
Timofey Mozgov 4/$64m
Jordan Clarkson 4/$50m
Marcelo Huertas 2/3m (last year ungtd)
Ivica Zubac 3/3.2m (last year ungtd)
Yi Jianlian 1/8m (250k gtd, 1.2m base salary, 2.3m bonus each at playing 20/40/59 games)
Brandon Ingram rookie scale
Not official yet:
Tarik Black 2/$12.8m (last year may be ungtd?)

Current Depth Chart: (as usual this is a rough draft taken from bbinsiders)
PG: D’Angelo Russell, Jose Calderon, Marcelo Huertas
SG: Jordan Clarkson, Lou Williams
SF: Luol Deng, Brandon Ingram, Anthony Brown, Nick Young
PF: Julius Randle, Larry Nance Jr.
C: Timofey Mozgov, Yi Jianlian, Tarik Black, Ivica Zubac

Needs:
Backup PG, youth at center, talent in general

Additional Thoughts:
Really this offseason seemed about setting up a culture. LA wasn't getting free agents and needed to go young and try to build a winning setup with Walton at the helm. I like him a lot as a prospective coach, but that said the Mozgov signing (and Yi) were both really baffling. I can live with Deng because he's at the least a solid trade chip and viable NBA player at that salary, but Mozzy was just awful. I like Ingram a lot and if Russell makes a leap, the future could be looking up. That said, the present isn't great. I'm thinking late season there's a full on tank to keep the pick one last year and go for another lottery stud.

Projected Win/Loss:21-61

Off-Season Grade: C


dbrandon wrote:dbrandon Review

Key Losses:
Kobe Bryant

One of the all-time greats. Not as good his last couple of years due to injury and age. It was time.

Losses:
Byron Scott (Head Coach)
Roy Hibbert
Brandon Bass
Ryan Kelly
Robert Sacre
Metta World Peace

I would probably have kept Bass around--he's a useful role player and a steady vet. But it's not a big deal letting him go. Everyone else can beat it.

Draft:
#2 Brandon Ingram
#32 Ivica Zubac

Very solid. Zubac is a good pickup, and Ingram (while an obvious pick) is a good one as well.

Trades:
Calderon with 2018 Denver 2nd and 2019 Chicago 2nd for cap space and the rights to Ater Majok

I don't really like the idea of trading for Calderon in general, but the cap space isn't getting used for anything and the 2nds are nice. Solid move to get a couple of assets for the future.

Free Agency:
Luke Walton (Head Coach)
Luol Deng 4/$72m
Timofey Mozgov 4/$64m
Jordan Clarkson 4/$50m
Marcelo Huertas 2/3m (last year ungtd)
Ivica Zubac 3/3.2m (last year ungtd)
Yi Jianlian 1/8m (250k gtd, 1.2m base salary, 2.3m bonus each at playing 20/40/59 games)
Brandon Ingram rookie scale
Not official yet:
Tarik Black 2/$12.8m (last year may be ungtd?)

It seems like LA has given up on the idea of suddenly luring a big-time FA with nothing more than the Laker name. And Walton did well in GSW, though Kerr was much more involved while out on leave than people generally think. It's an open question how good Walton will be as a coach. But surely he can't be worse than Scott, and he seems smart and well-liked.

But the money. Wow. The money. Deng has played a ton of minutes in his career, and he's going to be making $19mil in 2019 when he's 35. Mozgov is a solid player, but he's going to be making $16mil at age 34 in 2019. I think Clarkson was slightly overpaid, though I can live with it. He's a slightly above-average combo guard who was going to get paid, and they probably needed him. Black is fine, Jianlian is fine, Huertas is fine. But those top 3 deals are going to be very scary.

Current Depth Chart: (as usual this is a rough draft taken from bbinsiders)
PG: D’Angelo Russell, Jose Calderon, Marcelo Huertas
SG: Jordan Clarkson, Lou Williams
SF: Brandon Ingram, Luol Deng, Anthony Brown, Nick Young
PF: Julius Randle, Larry Nance Jr.
C: Timofey Mozgov, Tarik Black, Ivica Zubac, Yi Jianlian

A couple of nice young guys here. Obviously D'Angelo and Ingram are the two biggest potential guys. Defense is going to be a sieve still.

Needs:
Get Swaggy out of there, and probably try to flip Lou Will. Bring in a few more upside guys and maybe one more steady vet. Preferably one who can defend. It's hard to tell what they need outside of more time to develop.

Additional Thoughts:
Are they a better team now than last year? Yeah. Are they good? No. Can they improve? Yeah. Is there potential? Yeah. Are they handcuffed to some overpays? Oh yeah.

I'll give them some credit for bringing in good character vets--Deng and Mozgov are good guys to have--but those deals are longer than I thought, and those guys are both on the downslope.

Projected Win/Loss: 30 wins

Off-Season Grade: D+. I thought about C-, but I don't like enough of the other moves enough to outweigh spending that much long-term money on Deng/Mozgov. I think Vlade made better free agency decisions, if that gives any indication.


Slava wrote:Slava Review

Key Losses:
Kobe Bryant

As a 14 year old foreign kid, Kobe Bryant was basically my way into basketball and the NBA in general. His footwork, athleticism and the aestheticism in his game was captivating for me from day 1 and I was pretty disappointed when I understood that all NBA players aren't as skilled as that.

Having said that, as a grown up fan of the Lakers, I was literally counting down the days since he signed his last ill advised contract extension to the day he'd retire. I'm sure he generated a lot of buzz and filled the seats but he was quite frankly caustic to the product on the floor and the last thing I'd have wanted for a 19 year old D'Angelo Russell is to come into the league on and watch an over the hill Kobe chuck off-balanced 30 footers with no regard for the offense or professionalism to the game.

Anyways this closes a chapter in the franchise history and everyone can move on.

Losses:
Byron Scott (Head Coach)
Roy Hibbert
Brandon Bass
Ryan Kelly
Robert Sacre
Metta World Peace

Byron was obviously brought into coach Kobe into retirement as no one with a sane mind was willing to touch that with a 20 foot pole. If there was a case to be made to feel sorry for him, you could say that as bad as he was, he did not deserve Boozer, Hibbert, Nick Young, a broken down Kobe and Metta World Peace forced on him.

Kobe was pretty bad but any line up featuring Roy Hibbert had the worst net rating on an already piss poor team. I genuinely think he's the worst NBA player right now. He probably leads the league in falling down without contact and every single team feasted on his clumsiness by putting his man in screen and roll situations so they could isolate him with their PGs. Byron's genius tactic to have the bigs hedge 20 feet away from the rim did little to help.

I feel for Ryan Kelly who had a very strong debut season under Mike D'Antoni playing in his natural role as a stretch 4 and it wouldn't surprise me if he rejoined him in Houston and resurrected his career. Kelly has natural instincts for basketball and general smartness to know where he needs to be on both ends of the floor. Good old Byron probably messed him up worse than anyone else by constantly using him as a SF and asking him to guard the likes of Lebron James.

Shout out to Brandon Bass, the man was a rare sign of professionalism and hustle no matter what kind of circus was going on around him. Predictably Russell and Clarkson both had better net ratings when playing alongside him.

Draft:
#2 Brandon Ingram
#32 Ivica Zubac

Loved this. Lakers were fortunate enough to stay in the top 2 of a two player draft and I'd have been happy with either Simmons or Ingram. Ingram makes the fit a lot more comfortable as I have high hopes for Nance Jr developing into a solid starting PF.

I didn't expect Zubac to fall out of the mid first round so getting him at 32 was tremendous value and he showed enough flashes in summer league to indicate that he might not necessarily need to be enrolled into the D-League for a couple of seasons like most 2nd rounders.

Trades:
Calderon with 2018 Denver 2nd and 2019 Chicago 2nd for cap space and the rights to Ater Majok.

Liked this as well. Both these picks could be in the 30-42 range where the Lakers have drafted quite well and Calderon himself, despite his defensive short comings is still a heady veteran PG and a reliable 3 point shooter.

Free Agency:
Luke Walton (Head Coach)
Luol Deng 4/$72m
Timofey Mozgov 4/$64m
Jordan Clarkson 4/$50m
Marcelo Huertas 2/3m (last year ungtd)
Ivica Zubac 3/3.2m (last year ungtd)
Yi Jianlian 1/8m (250k gtd, 1.2m base salary, 2.3m bonus each at playing 20/40/59 games)
Brandon Ingram rookie scale
Not official yet:
Tarik Black 2/$12.8m (last year may be ungtd?)

I believed Luke will make a coach right since his playing days and while it doesn't surprise me that he made it here, it sure does surprise me that he's achieved it while being younger than some of the guys he could be coaching.

On a side note, the Lakers are run by Jerry Buss' kids, Jerry West's kid is the assistant GM, Bill Walton's son is the head coach and George Karl's son is coaching the D-league team. I'm also sure one of Elgin Baylor's kin is involved somewhere that I can't seem to recall. Atleast Thomas Scott was content being a player development coach rather than asking to play PG like Austin Rivers.

Unlike previous seasons the Lakers recovered quite quickly once they faced a couple of rejections, notably from Durant and Bazemore by offering Deng a good contract to shore up the SF position. Deng might actually be better as a stretch 4 now a days but that could also be good if it opens up more playing time for Brandon Ingram. Even if it doesn't work out, he is a player that can be moved.

They clearly mis-read the big man market when they offered Mozgov the deal they did but now a days in free agency you barely have time to get a read on the market. Teams tend to prioritize the guys they like for each position and go for them from the moment the clock strikes 12 on July 1st. The verdict on this deal rests heavily on Mozgov's health as he was the premier pick and roll big man and Lebron's chosen center the year before he got injured before rushing his rehab to show up for free agency.

Love the Clarkson contract as I expected someone like Brooklyn or Philly to make an RFA bid. Only complaint being unable to squeeze in the 5th year.

Huertas is having a nice olympics tourney for himself and at that price point its hard to complain even if he might be third in the depth chart at PG behind Calderon. He did shine playing PG in line ups where Russell played SG so that's a combo that might see some game time this year.

I'm not going to speak about marketing purposes but the Yi contract makes little sense for me even if it is for the veteran's minimum. He is a 31 year old center who goes to an embarrassing extent to avoid contact and his NBA level offense is confined to shooting an off balance right hand jump hook and long twos off pick and pops. Even if he does work out, what's the plan for him?

I'd much rather have seen those minutes go to Tarik Black, especially after it was mentioned that Byron not giving playing time to Tarik was a continuing reason for tension between the front office and coach over the last couple of seasons.

Even if the money was burning a hole in their pockets, why not make an RFA offer to Motiejunas? Houston would likely not match anything in excess of $14 mil and once Westbrook signed his extension, it became pointless to hoard cap space going into 2017. At least if the risk works out, you have a 25 year old center who can pass, shoot and score efficiently in the post.

Current Depth Chart: (as usual this is a rough draft taken from bbinsiders)
PG: D’Angelo Russell, Jose Calderon, Marcelo Huertas
SG: Jordan Clarkson, Lou Williams, Nick Young
SF: Luol Deng, Brandon Ingram, Anthony Brown
PF: Julius Randle, Larry Nance Jr.
C: Timofey Mozgov, Tarik Black, Yi Jianlian, Ivica Zubac

Obviously would have loved it if they got one or more of Hassan Whiteside, Bazemore or Motiejunas but in the absence of those, Deng and Mozgov are not bad additions even if things might get a bit hairy as those deals reach their final years. This is one of the more balanced rosters I have seen from the franchise in a while.

Needs:
1. Getting rid of Nick Young by any means necessary.
2. Continued development from D'Angelo Russell & Julius Randle.
3. A healthy season from Mozgov.

Additional Thoughts:
The draft working out in the Lakers' favour helped make this a very optimistic offseason. I would not have faulted them if they held onto Byron for one more season to tank for a top 3 pick and make sure we don't owe a 2019 first to Orlando but clearly they were concerned that the atmosphere was becoming too caustic for the existing younger players to develop and it was safer to cut the chord here than leave permanent scars on impressionable players who could benefit from a different approach than the old school drill sergeant routine Byron adopted. There's evidence of this already paying dividends with Russell and Clarkson not feeling shy to let their happiness known for the Luke Walton hire.

Projected Win/Loss: 30-52

Off-Season Grade: B
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#2 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Aug 24, 2016 2:49 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:There are two long standing Laker debates I have been involved in that I can think of offhand. First, that Russell is really more of a sg (Harden ball dominant type) versus a pg. Second, that Clarkson would eventually overtake Randle in trade value. That one is going on 2 years and I'm curious where it stands now with Clarkson's new contract. So tell me, how much more is Randle worth than Clarkson at this point?


Just quoting this to see if I can get a few responses to gauge what the temperature is in that regards.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,099
And1: 33,768
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#3 » by Slava » Wed Aug 24, 2016 2:54 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:There are two long standing Laker debates I have been involved in that I can think of offhand. First, that Russell is really more of a sg (Harden ball dominant type) versus a pg. Second, that Clarkson would eventually overtake Randle in trade value. That one is going on 2 years and I'm curious where it stands now with Clarkson's new contract. So tell me, how much more is Randle worth than Clarkson at this point?


Just quoting this to see if I can get a few responses to gauge what the temperature is in that regards.


I don't think he does to most franchises although a few might still have him pegged higher. Thibs and Minnesota might be one such team and I like your proposal of dealing him for Rubio. I've made different variations of that trade myself on the Lakers board albeit not including Pekovic.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#4 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Aug 24, 2016 2:57 pm

Slava wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:There are two long standing Laker debates I have been involved in that I can think of offhand. First, that Russell is really more of a sg (Harden ball dominant type) versus a pg. Second, that Clarkson would eventually overtake Randle in trade value. That one is going on 2 years and I'm curious where it stands now with Clarkson's new contract. So tell me, how much more is Randle worth than Clarkson at this point?


Just quoting this to see if I can get a few responses to gauge what the temperature is in that regards.


I don't think he does to most franchises although a few might still have him pegged higher. Thibs and Minnesota might be one such team and I like your proposal of dealing him for Rubio. I've made different variations of that trade myself on the Lakers board albeit not including Pekovic.


Typing that trade out scared me more than giving the Lakers an F, I was hoping no one would notice it fora little bit before I get lit on fire. But I really like Randle and Deng for Rubio if everyone can get happy with the values, and given the Lakers new cap situation eating Pekovic seemed okay to me.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,099
And1: 33,768
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#5 » by Slava » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:04 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
Slava wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
Just quoting this to see if I can get a few responses to gauge what the temperature is in that regards.


I don't think he does to most franchises although a few might still have him pegged higher. Thibs and Minnesota might be one such team and I like your proposal of dealing him for Rubio. I've made different variations of that trade myself on the Lakers board albeit not including Pekovic.


Typing that trade out scared me more than giving the Lakers an F, I was hoping no one would notice it fora little bit before I get lit on fire. But I really like Randle and Deng for Rubio if everyone can get happy with the values, and given the Lakers new cap situation eating Pekovic seemed okay to me.


My back up deal was Deng and OKC's choice of Calderon/Huertas for Payne and a contract or two OKC might want to dump on us. I have alluded to this in my OKC review. This is one reason I like the Deng deal as long as he can stay healthy till the trade deadline. He is an attractive piece for a lot of 3-8 seeds in either conference.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
Karmaloop
General Manager
Posts: 9,652
And1: 1,747
Joined: Sep 24, 2009
       

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#6 » by Karmaloop » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:16 pm

Holy cow. I wasn't expecting glowing reviews, but "F's" and "D+'s" were not what I expected. I mean, I suppose if we completely ignore the head coaching change and the draft, I could understand those views...

Let me start off by saying that I don't think any non-Lakers fans really understand how incompetent Bryon Scott is. Well scratch that, maybe some Cavs fans do but largely the masses still think Scott is a competent head coach. The reality is that most of his career success comes largely tied to CP3, and without a franchise PG like CP3 he's a terrible head coach. His rotation are a mismatch of players and talents, pulls players when they start to get momentum, and usually provides at least a half a dozen bone head decisions. I mean, it was no surprise that Byron Scott and D'Angelo Russell didn't see eye-to-eye, but the interview where Clarkson and Russell were being interviewed during the All Star weekend when one of the interviewers asked Russell how it felt to play in an "open system" as opposed to the military style that Scott had and Clarkson had to mutter under his breath to tell Russell not to say anything crazy. If that doesn't give you a pretty good idea of the disfunction that Scott brought, nothing will. Look, I've got no idea if Luke Walton is the right guy for the job, I hope he is. But the fact that the players are excited about playing for him and buying into the system goes a LONG way towards success. I mean, look at Steve Kerr if you need more proof. The players bought into the system, and they're winning. A LOT.

As for the draft, yes Brandon Ingram or Ben Simmons was the obvious choice for the casual viewer. That still doesn't diminish the fact that they nailed the draft. I very much disagree with HF's opinion about Simmons being a better fit than Ingram, especially with the composition of the team, the way the NBA is, and the rest of the Western Conference. And you can't just pick and choose what you want to give team credit for. They did what they were supposed to do. As for Zubac, if his Summer League performance did anything it should give you a bit more belief in him. Either way, the Lakers nailed the draft.

Obviously the free agency decision of the Lakers has gotten them a LOT of flak, but I'm not sure it's as bad as people are making it out to be. Obviously, the Lakers went into free agency as improving their center position as the primary concern. And yes, they overpaid Timofey Mozgov. I'm not sure there's anyway to sugarcoat it. But the options weren't pretty. Hassan Whiteside wouldn't even grant the Lakers a meeting despite most considering him one of the favorites. Bismack Biyombo was going to re-sign with Toronto, even for a discounted price before he didn't. Festus Ezeli reportedly turn down extension offers prior to the season, so he was clearly looking for a big, long-term deal and given his injury history would be a questionable decision. And given the fact that he's already injured, it probably was wise not to commit big money to him. So it essentially came down to overpaying for "their guy" versus going with some retread at center. I'll take Mozgov. Hell, if he would have gotten this contract an offseason earlier people would be talking about the Lakers getting a steal...

As for Luol Deng, the Lakers again wanted a veteran presence for their locker room. And I think that's one thing the Lakers really lacked outside of Kobe last year. Sure, paying $19M for a 34 year old player probably isn't the wisest, but it's probably a pretty fair bet to assume that the next CBA will have another amnesty clause. And neither contract is immoveable. The Yi contract was essentially the Lakers punting cap space.
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#7 » by BullyKing » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:17 pm

Slava wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
Slava wrote:
I don't think he does to most franchises although a few might still have him pegged higher. Thibs and Minnesota might be one such team and I like your proposal of dealing him for Rubio. I've made different variations of that trade myself on the Lakers board albeit not including Pekovic.


Typing that trade out scared me more than giving the Lakers an F, I was hoping no one would notice it fora little bit before I get lit on fire. But I really like Randle and Deng for Rubio if everyone can get happy with the values, and given the Lakers new cap situation eating Pekovic seemed okay to me.


My back up deal was Deng and OKC's choice of Calderon/Huertas for Payne and a contract or two OKC might want to dump on us. I have alluded to this in my OKC review. This is one reason I like the Deng deal as long as he can stay healthy till the trade deadline. He is an attractive piece for a lot of 3-8 seeds in either conference.


If he was an expiring yes. Or if it looks like he's found the fountain of youth this season, sure. But I really don't think too many teams are going to be lining up to that contract. I don't think Deng on that contract right now has any positive value at all.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#8 » by Andre Roberstan » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:21 pm

Slava wrote:My back up deal was Deng and OKC's choice of Calderon/Huertas for Payne and a contract or two OKC might want to dump on us. I have alluded to this in my OKC review. This is one reason I like the Deng deal as long as he can stay healthy till the trade deadline. He is an attractive piece for a lot of 3-8 seeds in either conference.


I would rather start Singler. Deng's contract terrifies me.
Image
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#9 » by bondom34 » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:22 pm

dbrandon wrote:
Slava wrote:My back up deal was Deng and OKC's choice of Calderon/Huertas for Payne and a contract or two OKC might want to dump on us. I have alluded to this in my OKC review. This is one reason I like the Deng deal as long as he can stay healthy till the trade deadline. He is an attractive piece for a lot of 3-8 seeds in either conference.


I would rather start Singler. Deng's contract terrifies me.

I'd take Deng but not at that price.

Plus that's 25 mil in incoming salary, there's no way it could work
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#10 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:23 pm

Karmaloop wrote:And you can't just pick and choose what you want to give team credit for. They did what they were supposed to do.


Those two sentences, following directly right after each other no less, are at a drastic conflict with each other imo.

If you want a prize for picking the clear 2nd best guy with the 2nd pick as if that was something deserving of credit and not 'what you are supposed to do', my review won't be for you. On the other hand, I firmly believe in grading team's off what they do with their situation, not the inherent situation they are in.

If the Lakers had been lotto ball unlucky and gave up the 4th pick instead of having the 2nd pick, I wouldn't have penalized the offseason grade for that. It wold have been a lot worse for the future, but it wasn't the result of management's actions. Same principle just on the flip side.
Karmaloop
General Manager
Posts: 9,652
And1: 1,747
Joined: Sep 24, 2009
       

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#11 » by Karmaloop » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:31 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:Those two sentences, following directly right after each other no less, are at a drastic conflict with each other imo.

If you want a prize for picking the clear 2nd best guy with the 2nd pick as if that was something deserving of credit and not 'what you are supposed to do', my review won't be for you. On the other hand, I firmly believe in grading team's off what they do with their situation, not the inherent situation they are in.

If the Lakers had been lotto ball unlucky and gave up the 4th pick instead of having the 2nd pick, I wouldn't have penalized the offseason grade for that. It wold have been a lot worse for the future, but it wasn't the result of management's actions. Same principle just on the flip side.


Except it isn't. If the Lakers felt a different player was the 2nd best player in the draft whether it be Buddy Hield, Kris Dunn, or whomever, you'd be kidding yourself if you wouldn't have knocked them for it. And that's why I'm baffled. If you knocked the team for taking someone else, you'd better be willing to give them credit for doing the right thing. The Lakers nailed what they could control.

You essentially graded the team's offseason based on two free agency decisions. If that's what you want to grade it on, so be it.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#12 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:35 pm

Karmaloop wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:Those two sentences, following directly right after each other no less, are at a drastic conflict with each other imo.

If you want a prize for picking the clear 2nd best guy with the 2nd pick as if that was something deserving of credit and not 'what you are supposed to do', my review won't be for you. On the other hand, I firmly believe in grading team's off what they do with their situation, not the inherent situation they are in.

If the Lakers had been lotto ball unlucky and gave up the 4th pick instead of having the 2nd pick, I wouldn't have penalized the offseason grade for that. It wold have been a lot worse for the future, but it wasn't the result of management's actions. Same principle just on the flip side.


Except it isn't. If the Lakers felt a different player was the 2nd best player in the draft whether it be Buddy Hield, Kris Dunn, or whomever, you'd be kidding yourself if you wouldn't have knocked them for it. And that's why I'm baffled. If you knocked the team for taking someone else, you'd better be willing to give them credit for doing the right thing. The Lakers nailed what they could control.

You essentially graded the team's offseason based on two free agency decisions. If that's what you want to grade it on, so be it.


If the Lakers did something worse than expected at #2, I definitely would have penalized it.
If the Lakers did something better than expected at #2, I definitely would have rewarded it.

They did exactly what was expected, and neither get rewarded nor punished.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#13 » by dockingsched » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:35 pm

Understandbly, seems people still haven't adjusted to judging the new dollar amounts handed out within the context of the new cap.

By giving the lakers a grade of D or lower, you're essentially saying that the contracts of Deng and Mozgov are so detrimental the they far outweigh the positive impact of going from Scott to Walton and of locking up Clarkson to such a comparatively bargain contract. I don't see how that's an a position that holds up.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#14 » by Andre Roberstan » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:40 pm

dockingsched wrote:Understandbly, seems people still haven't adjusted to judging the new dollar amounts handed out within the context of the new cap.


Yeah, I'm not buying this.

It's not the money I (and I think probably the others) have a problem with. It's the length of contract for guys who are on the back side of their careers at that money. Is Deng going to be worth $18mil in 2020 when Russell and Ingram have developed? I highly doubt it--he's played a lot of minutes, and there isn't a lot of tread left on the tires. Is Mozgov going to be worth $16mil? Also highly doubt that.

Those are two albatrosses around your neck that don't expire until after the other guys on your team start getting good.

Pay them that for 2 years and I might not like it that much, but could understand it. 4 years is unconscionable. Deng and Mozgov will help this year, and probably next year. Past that I don't know.
Image
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#15 » by Mystical Apples » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:41 pm

I liked LAL's off-season more than most and gave them a C. If there's an amnesty clause in the next CBA I can see them getting out of the Deng contract (trade) and Mozgov's (amnesty).

Ingram and Zubac are nice pieces - neither will be massive game changers but solid to surround Russell via addition by subtracting high usage players. Calderon was a decent pickup too, though maybe too decent if the goal is keeping 2017's #1. And I'm still high on Russell and would take him 3rd in a 2015 redraft.

That said, not a fan of Randle - at all - unless he's utilized as an energy bench player. His value is nowhere near Rubio's universe.
geometry
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#16 » by Andre Roberstan » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:45 pm

Mystical Apples wrote:I liked LAL's off-season more than most and gave them a C. If there's an amnesty clause in the next CBA I can see them getting out of the Deng contract (trade) and Mozgov's (amnesty).

Ingram and Zubac are nice pieces - neither will be massive game changers but solid to surround Russell via addition by subtracting high usage players. Calderon was a decent pickup too, though maybe too decent if the goal is keeping 2017's #1. And I'm still high on Russell and would take him 3rd in a 2015 redraft.

That said, not a fan of Randle - at all - unless he's utilized as an energy bench player. His value is nowhere near Rubio's universe.


Early rumblings indicate that an amnesty clause wasn't as likely as I originally thought. A number of owners are unhappy about front offices getting a free pass for signing an awful contract.

Can't remember the source on that. Might be Nate Duncan.

But I'd actually put good money on Deng's contract being worse than Mozgov's. Agree with pretty much everything else though, although Calderon's inability to stay in front of my 70-year-old grandmother on defense probably outweighs his value on the other end.
Image
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#17 » by dockingsched » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:56 pm

dbrandon wrote:
dockingsched wrote:Understandbly, seems people still haven't adjusted to judging the new dollar amounts handed out within the context of the new cap.


Yeah, I'm not buying this.

It's not the money I (and I think probably the others) have a problem with. It's the length of contract for guys who are on the back side of their careers at that money. Is Deng going to be worth $18mil in 2020 when Russell and Ingram have developed? I highly doubt it--he's played a lot of minutes, and there isn't a lot of tread left on the tires. Is Mozgov going to be worth $16mil? Also highly doubt that.

Those are two albatrosses around your neck that don't expire until after the other guys on your team start getting good.

Pay them that for 2 years and I might not like it that much, but could understand it. 4 years is unconscionable. Deng and Mozgov will help this year, and probably next year. Past that I don't know.

There's no such thing as paying them for 2 years. In the context of this offseason, 4 years was the length needed to lock up these players. Lakers weren't in a position to hold out because when all these players are locked up, contenders able to offer winning environments and more exposure will pick up anyone left that is settling for these 2 yr deals.

The real and only choice the lakers had was doing what they did vs doing nothing. Planning to do nothing probably isn't going to attract Walton and is probably going to have a negative impact on the youngsters that need veteran examples and to shake some of the losing habits they developed last season. Neither choice was ideal, but it's important to judge the lakers on the options they had not on some unrealistic expectation they they sign these players for 2 years instead of 4.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,099
And1: 33,768
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#18 » by Slava » Wed Aug 24, 2016 4:08 pm

dbrandon wrote:
dockingsched wrote:Understandbly, seems people still haven't adjusted to judging the new dollar amounts handed out within the context of the new cap.


Yeah, I'm not buying this.

It's not the money I (and I think probably the others) have a problem with. It's the length of contract for guys who are on the back side of their careers at that money. Is Deng going to be worth $18mil in 2020 when Russell and Ingram have developed? I highly doubt it--he's played a lot of minutes, and there isn't a lot of tread left on the tires. Is Mozgov going to be worth $16mil? Also highly doubt that.

Those are two albatrosses around your neck that don't expire until after the other guys on your team start getting good.

Pay them that for 2 years and I might not like it that much, but could understand it. 4 years is unconscionable. Deng and Mozgov will help this year, and probably next year. Past that I don't know.


For a different perspective, Deng is younger than both Lebron and Melo, his only serious injury to date has been a situation horribly mismanaged by the Chicago medicos. For a player that ranked 8th in RPM among SFs last season its hard to haggle on 2 year deals. $18 mil is 1/5th of your cap, which is fair price to play for a player you view as a starter.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#19 » by Andre Roberstan » Wed Aug 24, 2016 4:11 pm

dockingsched wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
dockingsched wrote:Understandbly, seems people still haven't adjusted to judging the new dollar amounts handed out within the context of the new cap.


Yeah, I'm not buying this.

It's not the money I (and I think probably the others) have a problem with. It's the length of contract for guys who are on the back side of their careers at that money. Is Deng going to be worth $18mil in 2020 when Russell and Ingram have developed? I highly doubt it--he's played a lot of minutes, and there isn't a lot of tread left on the tires. Is Mozgov going to be worth $16mil? Also highly doubt that.

Those are two albatrosses around your neck that don't expire until after the other guys on your team start getting good.

Pay them that for 2 years and I might not like it that much, but could understand it. 4 years is unconscionable. Deng and Mozgov will help this year, and probably next year. Past that I don't know.

There's no such thing as paying them for 2 years. In the context of this offseason, 4 years was the length needed to lock up these players. Lakers weren't in a position to hold out because when all these players are locked up, contenders able to offer winning environments and more exposure will pick up anyone left that is settling for these 2 yr deals.

The real and only choice the lakers had was doing what they did vs doing nothing. Planning to do nothing probably isn't going to attract Walton and is probably going to have a negative impact on the youngsters that need veteran examples and to shake some of the losing habits they developed last season. Neither choice was ideal, but it's important to judge the lakers on the options they had not on some unrealistic expectation they they sign these players for 2 years instead of 4.


Ian Mahinmi is the only center of similar age and skillset who got paid like Mozgov. And honestly I'd take him over Mozzy. And he got paid slightly less.

Jeff Green is probably the closest comp for age and skillset that I can find for Deng (yes, I know Deng's still a better overall player) and he got 1 year $15mil.

And it's not like those guys were signing with title contenders.

I'm having a hard time believing that a guy who's going to be around #15 on the list of minutes played for active NBA players was getting 4-year contract deals for that amount of money elsewhere.
Image
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Los Angeles Lakers early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava) 

Post#20 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Aug 24, 2016 4:13 pm

dockingsched wrote:locking up Clarkson to such a comparatively bargain contract.


I debated going into Clarkson more.

His absolute highest contract possible (from another team) was $60,719,028.75/4. He signed for 50/4. That 2.5m a year under the max is nice, but I'm not really sold they structured it right at all.

As is, it is structured with a small dip down in year 2. However, even with that dip down if the Lakers had gotten Clarkson to shop around and get an offer they could match, the Lakers would have had a cap hit of $5,681,240 less in year 2 ($5,881,260 versus $11,562,500). So, for maximizing cap space for next offseason the Lakers would have been better off even if it meant a 60/4 matching an Arenas deal.

In contrast, if you are worried about year 3 and 4, it isn't clear why the Lakers didn't take their extra cap space this year and use it on creating a full declining structure for Clarkson. (And Deng. And Mozgov.)

So, as mentioned above the team could have had an extra 5.7m next year. Or for $4,045,633.05 in current cap space when they didn't have a good use of it, the team could have free up 6.5m in 3 years when a Clarkson/Russell/Ingram/Randle core is more likely to be peaking. The Lakers maximized neither.

Spoiler:
16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 Total
Luol Deng $18,000,000 $17,190,000 $18,000,000 $18,810,000 $72,000,000
Timofey Mozgov $16,000,000 $15,280,000 $16,000,000 $16,720,000 $64,000,000
Jordan Clarkson $12,500,000 $11,562,500 $12,500,000 $13,437,500 $50,000,000
Yearly Total $46,500,000 $44,032,500 $46,500,000 $48,967,500

Luol Deng $19,302,949 $18,434,316.35 $17,565,683.65 $16,697,050.94 $72,000,000
Timofey Mozgov $17,158,177 $16,386,058.98 $15,613,941.02 $14,841,823.06 $64,000,000
Jordan Clarkson $14,084,507 $13,028,169.01 $11,971,830.99 $10,915,492.96 $50,000,000
Yearly Total $50,545,633 $47,848,544 $45,151,456 $42,454,367
Difference -$4,045,633 -$3,816,044 $1,348,544 $6,513,133

Return to Trades and Transactions